skip to main content
10.1145/2663204.2663257acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The SWELL Knowledge Work Dataset for Stress and User Modeling Research

Published:12 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the new multimodal SWELL knowledge work (SWELL-KW) dataset for research on stress and user modeling. The dataset was collected in an experiment, in which 25 people performed typical knowledge work (writing reports, making presentations, reading e-mail, searching for information). We manipulated their working conditions with the stressors: email interruptions and time pressure. A varied set of data was recorded: computer logging, facial expression from camera recordings, body postures from a Kinect 3D sensor and heart rate (variability) and skin conductance from body sensors. The dataset made available not only contains raw data, but also preprocessed data and extracted features. The participants' subjective experience on task load, mental effort, emotion and perceived stress was assessed with validated questionnaires as a ground truth. The resulting dataset on working behavior and affect is a valuable contribution to several research fields, such as work psychology, user modeling and context aware systems.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

icmi2189-file3.mp4

mp4

15.1 MB

References

  1. M. M. Bradley and P. J. Lang. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 25(1):49--59, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. E. Demerouti, A. B. Bakker, S. A. Geurts, and T. W. Taris. Daily recovery from work-related effort during non-work time. Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being, 7:85--123, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. E. Demerouti, A. B. Bakker, F. Nachreiner, and W. B. Schaufeli. The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied psychology, 86(3):499, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. D. F. Dinges, R. L. Rider, J. Dorrian, E. L. McGlinchey, N. L. Rogers, Z. Cizman, S. K. Goldenstein, C. Vogler, S. Venkataraman, and D. N. Metaxas. Optical computer recognition of facial expressions associated with stress induced by performance demands. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 76(Supplement 1):B172--B182, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. C. Duttweiler. The internal control index: A newly developed measure of locus of control. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44(2):209--221, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. S. G. Hart and L. E. Staveland. Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in psychology, 52:139--183, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Kapoor and R. W. Picard. Multimodal affect recognition in learning environments. In Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 677--682. ACM, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Koldijk. Automatic recognition of context and stress to support knowledge workers. In Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, pages D20--D23. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Koldijk, M. Sappelli, M. Neerincx, and W. Kraaij. Unobtrusive monitoring of knowledge workers for stress self-regulation. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, pages 335--337. Springer, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Koldijk, M. van Staalduinen, M. Neerincx, and W. Kraaij. Real-time task recognition based on knowledge workers' computer activities. In Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, pages 152--159. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. L. Koppes, E. d. Vroome, G. Mars, B. Janssen, M. Zwieten, and S. v. d. Bossche. Nationale enquete arbeidsomstandigheden 2012: Methodologie en globale resultaten, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. Kraan, S. Dhondt, I. Houtman, R. Nelemans, and E. d. Vroome. Handleiding nova-weba: Hernieuwde versie., 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. G. Mark, D. Gudith, and U. Klocke. The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 107--110. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. F. Mokhayeri, M.-R. Akbarzadeh-T, and S. Toosizadeh. Mental stress detection using physiological signals based on soft computing techniques. In Biomedical Engineering (ICBME), 2011 18th Iranian Conference of, pages 232--237. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. Riera, A. Soria-Frisch, A. Albajes-Eizagirre, P. Cipresso, C. Grau, S. Dunne, G. Ruffini, and S. aStarlab Barcelona. Electro-physiological data fusion for stress detection. Studies in health technology and informatics, 181:228--32, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Ruff. Information overload: Causes, symptoms and solutions. Harvard Graduate School of Education, pages 1--13, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Sappelli, S. Verberne, S. Koldijk, and W. Kraaij. Collecting a dataset of information behaviour in context. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Context-awareness in Retrieval and Recommendation, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Soleymani, J. Lichtenauer, T. Pun, and M. Pantic. A multimodal database for affect recognition and implicit tagging. Affective Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 3(1):42--55, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. L. M. Vizer, L. Zhou, and A. Sears. Automated stress detection using keystroke and linguistic features: An exploratory study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(10):870--886, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. D. Zapf. Stress-oriented analysis of computerized office work. The European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 3(2):85--100, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. F. Zijlstra and L. van Doorn. The construction of a scale to measure subjective effort. Technical report, Delft University of Technology, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The SWELL Knowledge Work Dataset for Stress and User Modeling Research

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ICMI '14: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
            November 2014
            558 pages
            ISBN:9781450328852
            DOI:10.1145/2663204

            Copyright © 2014 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 12 November 2014

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            ICMI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate51of127submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader