skip to main content
10.1145/2766462.2767839acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Active Learning for Entity Filtering in Microblog Streams

Published:09 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Monitoring the reputation of entities such as companies or brands in microblog streams (e.g., Twitter) starts by selecting mentions that are related to the entity of interest. Entities are often ambiguous (e.g., "Jaguar" or "Ford") and effective methods for selectively removing non-relevant mentions often use background knowledge obtained from domain experts. Manual annotations by experts, however, are costly. We therefore approach the problem of entity filtering with active learning, thereby reducing the annotation load for experts. To this end, we use a strong passive baseline and analyze different sampling methods for selecting samples for annotation. We find that margin sampling--an informative type of sampling that considers the distance to the hyperplane used for class separation--can effectively be used for entity filtering and can significantly reduce the cost of annotating initial training data.

References

  1. E. Amigó, J. Artiles, J. Gonzalo, D. Spina, B. Liu, and A. Corujo. WePS-3 evaluation campaign: Overview of the online reputation management task. In CLEF '10 (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. E. Amigó, A. Corujo, J. Gonzalo, E. Meij, and M. de Rijke. Overview of RepLab 2012: Evaluating online reputation management systems. In CLEF '12 (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Amigó, J. Carrillo de Albornoz, I. Chugur, A. Corujo, J. Gonzalo, T. Martın, E. Meij, M. de Rijke, and D. Spina. Overview of RepLab 2013: Evaluating online reputation monitoring systems. In CLEF '13 (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop), pages 333--352, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. E. Amigó, J. Gonzalo, and F. Verdejo. A general evaluation measure for document organization tasks. In SIGIR '13, pages 643--652, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Atserias, G. Attardi, M. Simi, and H. Zaragoza. Active learning for building a corpus of questions for parsing. In LREC '10, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. L. Figueroa, Q. Zeng-Treitler, L. H. Ngo, S. Goryachev, and E. P. Wiechmann. Active learning for clinical text classification: is it better than random sampling? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19 (5): 809--816, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. Hu. Active Learning for Text Classification. PhD thesis, Dublin Institute of Technology, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M.-H. Peetz. Time-Aware Online Reputation Analysis. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. E. Pilkington. Unsold H&M clothes found in rubbish bags as homeless face winter chill. riptsize http://bit.ly/theguardian2010HMhttp://bit.ly/theguardian2010HM, January 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Sassano. An empirical study of active learning with support vector machines for Japanese word segmentation. In ACL '02, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Settles. Active learning literature survey. Computer Sciences Technical Report 1648, University of Wisconsin--Madison, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. D. Spina. Entity-Based Filtering and Topic Detection for Online Reputation Monitoring in Twitter. PhD thesis, UNED, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Spina, J. Carrillo de Albornoz, T. Martın, E. Amigó, J. Gonzalo, and F. Giner. UNED Online Reputation Monitoring Team at RepLab 2013. In CLEF '13 (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. Spina, J. Gonzalo, and E. Amigó. Discovering filter keywords for company name disambiguation in Twitter. Expert Systems with Applications, 40 (12): 4986--5003, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Tong and D. Koller. Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2: 45--66, Mar. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Z. Xu, R. Akella, and Y. Zhang. Incorporating diversity and density in active learning for relevance feedback. In ECIR '07, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Zhu, H. Wang, and B. Tsou. A density-based re-ranking technique for active learning for data annotations. In ICCPOL '09, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Active Learning for Entity Filtering in Microblog Streams

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '15: Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
        August 2015
        1198 pages
        ISBN:9781450336215
        DOI:10.1145/2766462

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 August 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGIR '15 Paper Acceptance Rate70of351submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader