skip to main content
10.1145/2809730.2809758acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

TactiCar: towards supporting drivers during lane change using vibro-tactile patterns

Published:01 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

While deciding if it is possible to overtake a slower car, drivers have to take several factors into account. Accident statistics show that many drivers make mistakes in this sit-uation. We want to assist drivers during lane change deci-sion without raising his or her mental workload. Since vision is already highly loaded to assess the situation, we address vibration in this work and investigated if it is possible to con-tinuously inform drivers about a closing car using a vibro-tactile belt. We developed two different tactile patterns and tested them in a driving simulator. Both patterns achieved promising results regarding usability. In the future, we plan to refine the patterns and evaluate the impact on workload and safety.

References

  1. Amna Asif and Susanne Boll. 2010. Where to Turn My Car?: Comparison of a Tactile Display and a Conventional Car Navigation System Under High Load Condition. In Proc. of AutomotiveUI '10. 64--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Arne Bartels, Marc-Michael Meinecke, and Simon Steinmeyer. 2015. Fahrstreifenwechselassistenz. In Handbuch Fahrerassistenzsysteme. 959--974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stephen A. Brewster and Lorna M. Brown. 2004. Non-visual Information Display Using Tactons. In CHI EA '04. 787--788. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. ISO 17387 2008. Intelligent transport systems -- Lane change decision aid systems (LCDAS) -- Performance requirements and test procedures. ISO 17387:2008. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Löcken, H. Müller, W. Heuten, and S. Boll. 2015. An Experiment on Ambient Light Patterns to Support Lane Change Decisions. In 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). 505--510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnold M. Lund. 2001. Measuring Usability with the USE Questionnaire. Usability Interface: The usability SIG newsletter of the Society for Technical Communications 8, 2 (2001). Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20141206144115/http://www.stcsig.org/usability/newsletter/0110_measuring_with_use.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Martin Pielot, Oliver Krull, and Susanne Boll. 2010. Where is My Team: Supporting Situation Awareness with Tactile Displays. In Proc. of CHI '10. 1705--1714. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Statistisches Bundesamt. 2014. Verkehrsunfälle -- Fachserie 8 Reihe 7. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Koji Tsukada and Michiaki Yasumura. 2004. ActiveBelt: Belt-Type Wearable Tactile Display for Directional Navigation. In UbiComp 2004: Ubiquitous Computing. 384--399.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Christopher D. Wickens. 2008. Multiple Resources and Mental Workload. Human Factors 50, 3 (2008), 449--455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. TactiCar: towards supporting drivers during lane change using vibro-tactile patterns

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AutomotiveUI '15: Adjunct Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
      September 2015
      172 pages
      ISBN:9781450338585
      DOI:10.1145/2809730

      Copyright © 2015 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 September 2015

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate248of566submissions,44%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader