Imadeddine Mountasser
ABSTRACT
Ontology matching is one of the essential methodologies to overcome heterogeneity issues. Multiple knowledge-based and information systems perform ontology matching strategies to find correspondences between several ontologies for the purpose of discovering valuable information across various domains. The design and implementation of matching systems raises several challenges, especially, the matching accuracy and the performance issues. Accordingly, adapting the system to the requirements of Big Data era brings additional perspectives and challenges. Furthermore, to provide on-the-fly matching and in-time processing, the system must handle matching accuracy, runtime complexity and performance issues as an entire matching strategy. To this end, this paper presents a new hybrid ontology matching approach that benefit on one hand from the opportunities offered by parallel platforms, and on the other hand from ontology matching techniques, while applying a resource-based decomposition to improve the performance of the system.
- Algergawy, A., Babalou, S., Kargar, M. J., & Davarpanah, S. H. (2015, September). SeeCOnt: A New Seeding-Based Clustering Approach for Ontology Matching. In East European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems (pp. 245--258). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Algergawy, A., Massmann, S., & Rahm, E. (2011, September). A clustering-based approach for large-scale ontology matching. In East European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems (pp. 415--428). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amin, M. B., Khan, W. A., Lee, S., & Kang, B. H. (2015). Performance-based ontology matching. Applied Intelligence, 43(2), 356--385. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ba, M., & Diallo, G. (2013). Large-scale biomedical ontology matching with ServOMap. IRBM, 34(1), 56--59.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brandes, U., Borgatti, S. P., & Freeman, L. C. (2016). Maintaining the duality of closeness and betweenness centrality. Social Networks, 44, 153--159.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Csató, L. (2015). Measuring centrality by a generalization of degree. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 1--20.Google Scholar
- David, J., Guillet, F., & Briand, H. (2006, November). Matching directories and OWL ontologies with AROMA. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management (pp. 830--831). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Djeddi, W. E., & Khadir, M. T. (2014, September). A novel approach using context-based measure for matching large scale ontologies. In International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery (pp. 320--331). Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Do, H. H., & Rahm, E. (2007). Matching large schemas: Approaches and evaluation. Information Systems, 32(6), 857--885. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ehrig, M., & Staab, S. (2004, November). QOM-quick ontology mapping. In International Semantic Web Conference (pp. 683--697). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Essayeh, A., & Abed, M. (2015). Towards Ontology Matching Based System Through Terminological, Structural and Semantic Level. Procedia Computer Science, 60, 403--412.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Euzenat, J. and Shvaiko, P., 2007. Ontology matching (Vol. 333). Heidelberg: Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Friedl, D. M. B., & Heidemann, J. (2010). A critical review of centrality measures in social networks. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2(6), 371--385.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gross, A., Hartung, M., Kirsten, T., & Rahm, E. (2010, August). On matching large life science ontologies in parallel. In International Conference on Data Integration in the Life Sciences (pp. 35--49). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hu, W., Qu, Y., & Cheng, G. (2008). Matching large ontologies: A divide-and-conquer approach. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 67(1), 140--160. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jiménez-Ruiz, E., & Grau, B. C. (2011, October). Logmap: Logic-based and scalable ontology matching. In International Semantic Web Conference (pp. 273--288). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kirsten, T., Kolb, L., Hartung, M., Groß, A., Köpcke, H., & Rahm, E. (2010). Data partitioning for parallel entity matching. arXiv preprint arXiv:1006.5309.Google Scholar
- Klein, D. J. (2010). Centrality measure in graphs. Journal of mathematical chemistry, 47(4), 1209--1223.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miller, G. A. (1995). WordNet: a lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 39--41. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Moawed, S., Algergawy, A., Sarhan, A., Eldosouky, A., & Saake, G. (2014). A latent semantic indexing-based approach to determine similar clusters in large-scale schema matching. In New Trends in Databases and Information Systems (pp. 267--276). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Mountasser, I., Ouhbi, B., & Frikh, B. (2015, December). From data to wisdom: A new multi-layer prototype for Big Data management process. In 2015 15th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA) (pp. 104--109). IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Otero-Cerdeira, L., Rodríguez-Martínez, F. J., & Gómez-Rodríguez, A. (2015). Ontology matching: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(2), 949--971. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peukert, E., Berthold, H., & Rahm, E. (2010, March). Rewrite techniques for performance optimization of schema matching processes. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (pp. 453--464). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rahm, E. (2011). Towards large-scale schema and ontology matching. In Schema matching and mapping (pp. 3--27). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Santodomingo, R., Rohjans, S., Uslar, M., Rodríguez-Mondéjar, J. A., & Sanz-Bobi, M. A. (2014). Ontology matching system for future energy smart grids. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 32, 242--257.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schuhmacher, M., & Ponzetto, S. P. (2014, May). Ranking Entities in a Large Semantic Network. In European Semantic Web Conference (pp. 254--258). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Seddiqui, M. H., & Aono, M. (2009). An efficient and scalable algorithm for segmented alignment of ontologies of arbitrary size. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 7(4), 344--356. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shvaiko, P., & Euzenat, J. (2013). Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 25(1), 158--176. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Song, F., Zacharewicz, G., & Chen, D. (2013). An Analytic Aggregation-Based Ontology Alignment Approach with Multiple Matchers. In Advanced Techniques for Knowledge Engineering and Innovative Applications (pp. 143--159). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Steyskal, S., & Polleres, A. (2013, September). Mix'n'match: An alternative approach for combining ontology matchers. In OTM Confederated International Conferences" On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems" (pp. 555--563). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Wang, P., Zhou, Y., & Xu, B. (2011, July). Matching large ontologies based on reduction anchors. In IJCAI (pp. 2343--2348). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Hybrid large-scale ontology matching strategy on big data environment
Recommendations
Performance-based ontology matching
Ontology matching is among the core techniques used for heterogeneity resolution by information and knowledge-based systems. However, due to the excess and ever-evolving nature of data, ontologies are becoming large-scale and complex; consequently, ...
Deep Embedding Learning With Auto-Encoder for Large-Scale Ontology Matching
Ontology matching is an efficient method to establish interoperability among heterogeneous ontologies. Large-scale ontology matching still remains a big challenge for its long time and large memory space consumption. The actual solution to this ...
On matching large life science ontologies in parallel
DILS'10: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Data integration in the life sciencesMatching life science ontologies to determine ontology mappings has recently become an active field of research. The large size of existing ontologies and the application of complex match strategies for obtaining high quality mappings makes ontology ...
Comments