skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300608acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Paper

Voice User Interfaces in Schools: Co-designing for Inclusion with Visually-Impaired and Sighted Pupils

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Voice user interfaces (VUIs) are increasingly popular, particularly in homes. However, little research has investigated their potential in other settings, such as schools. We investigated how VUIs could support inclusive education, particularly for pupils with visual impairments (VIs). We organised focused discussions with educators at a school, with support staff from local authorities and, through bodystorming, with a class of 27 pupils. We then ran a series of co-design workshops with participants with mixed-visual abilities to design an educational VUI application. This provided insights into challenges faced by pupils with VIs in mainstream schools, and opened a space for educators, sighted and visually impaired pupils to reflect on and design for their shared learning experiences through VUIs. We present scenarios, a design space and an example application that show novel ways of using VUIs for inclusive education. We also reflect on co-designing with mixed-visual-ability groups in this space.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper378.mp4

mp4

19.4 MB

paper378p.mp4

mp4

2.1 MB

References

  1. Roberto Aldunate and Miguel Nussbaum. 2013. Teacher adoption of technology. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3 (2013), 519--524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mohammed Ibrahim Alhojailan. 2012. Thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation. West East Journal of Social Sciences 1, 1 (2012), 39--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M Astrid, Nicole C Krämer, Jonathan Gratch, and Sin-Hwa Kang. 2010. "It doesn't matter what you are!" Explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 6 (2010), 1641--1650. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Julie A Bardin and Sandra Lewis. 2008. A survey of the academic engagement of students with visual impairments in general education classes. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 102, 8 (2008), 472.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Laura Benton and Hilary Johnson. 2015. Widening participation in technology design: A review of the involvement of children with special educational needs and disabilities. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 3 (2015), 23--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Stacy M Branham and Shaun K Kane. 2015. Collaborative accessibility: How blind and sighted companions co-create accessible home spaces. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2373--2382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Emeline Brulé and Gilles Bailly. 2018. Taking into Account Sensory Knowledge: The Case of Geo-techologies for Children with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Colin Burns, Eric Dishman, William Verplank, and Bud Lassiter. 1994. Actors, Hairdos &Amp; Videotape&Mdash;Informance Design. In Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '94). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 119--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Andreea Danielescu and Gwen Christian. 2018. A Bot is Not a Polyglot: Designing Personalities for Multi-Lingual Conversational Agents. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, CS01. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. David DeVault, Ron Artstein, Grace Benn, Teresa Dey, Ed Fast, Alesia Gainer, Kallirroi Georgila, Jon Gratch, Arno Hartholt, Margaux Lhommet, et al. 2014. SimSensei Kiosk: A virtual human interviewer for healthcare decision support. In Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 1061--1068. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Peter Farrell, Alison Alborz, Andy Howes, and Diana Pearson. 2010. The impact of teaching assistants on improving pupils' academic achievement in mainstream schools: A review of the literature. Educational Review 62, 4 (2010), 435--448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Daniel Fitton, Janet C Read, Gavin Sim, and Brendan Cassidy. 2018. Co-designing voice user interfaces with teenagers in the context of smart homes. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 55--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. German Flores and Roberto Manduchi. 2018. Easy Return: An App for Indoor Backtracking Assistance. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 17. CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland UK O. Metatla et al. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ashley Flower, Matthew K. Burns, and Nicole A. Bottsford - Miller. 2007. Meta-analysis of disability simulation research. Remedial and Special Education 28, 2 (2007), 72--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Christopher Frauenberger, Julia Makhaeva, and Katharina Spiel. 2017. Blending Methods: Developing Participatory Design Sessions for Autistic Children. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 39--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Euan Freeman, Graham Wilson, Stephen Brewster, Gabriel Baud-Bovy, Charlotte Magnusson, and Hector Caltenco. 2017. Audible Beacons and Wearables in Schools: Helping Young Visually Impaired Children Play and Move Independently. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4146--4157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Michael F. Giangreco. 2013. Teacher assistant supports in inclusive schools: Research, practices and alternatives. Australasian Journal of Special Education 37, 2 (2013), 93--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Marion Hersh. 2017. Classification framework for ICT-based learning technologies for disabled people. British Journal of Educational Technology 48, 3 (2017), 768--788.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Hernisa Kacorri, Eshed Ohn-Bar, Kris M Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2018. Environmental Factors in Indoor Navigation Based on RealWorld Trajectories of Blind Users. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Joseph'Jofish' Kaye, Joel Fischer, Jason Hong, Frank R Bentley, Cosmin Munteanu, Alexis Hiniker, Janice Y Tsai, and Tawfiq Ammari. 2018. Panel: Voice Assistants, UX Design and Research. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, panel01. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Alice Kerly, Richard Ellis, and Susan Bull. 2008. CALMsystem: a conversational agent for learner modelling. In Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XV. Springer, 89--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ewa Luger and Abigail Sellen. 2016. Like having a really bad PA: the gulf between user expectation and experience of conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5286--5297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Charlotte Magnusson, Héctor Caltenco, Sara Finocchietti, Giulia Cappagli, Graham Wilson, and Monica Gori. 2015. What do you like? early design explorations of sound and haptic preferences. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct. ACM, 766--773. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Charlotte Magnusson, Per-Olof Hedvall, and Héctor Caltenco. 2018. Co-designing together with Persons with Visual Impairments. In Mobility of Visually Impaired People. Springer, 411--434.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Laura Malinverni, Joan Mora-Guiard, Vanesa Padillo, MariaAngeles Mairena, Amaia Hervás, and Narcis Pares. 2014. Participatory design strategies to enhance the creative contribution of children with special needs. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children. ACM, 85--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Joanne McElligott and Lieselotte Van Leeuwen. 2004. Designing sound tools and toys for blind and visually impaired children. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Interaction design and children: building a community. ACM, 65--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Michael McTear, Zoraida Callejas, and David Griol. 2016. The conversational interface: Talking to smart devices. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Oussama Metatla, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Tony Stockman. 2018. "I Hear You": Understanding Awareness Information Exchange in an Audio-only Workspace. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 546. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Oussama Metatla, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Tony Stockman, and Fiore Martin. 2015. Designing with and for people living with visual impairments: audio-tactile mock-ups, audio diaries and participatory prototyping. CoDesign 11, 1 (2015), 35--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Oussama Metatla and Clare Cullen. 2018. "Bursting the Assistance Bubble": Designing Inclusive Technology with Children with Mixed Visual Abilities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Oussama Metatla, Fiore Martin, Adam Parkinson, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Tony Stockman, and Atau Tanaka. 2016. Audio-haptic interfaces for digital audio workstations. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 10, 3 (01 Sep 2016), 247--258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Oussama Metatla, Marcos Serrano, Christophe Jouffrais, Anja Thieme, Shaun Kane, Stacy Branham, Émeline Brulé, and Cynthia L Bennett. 2018. Inclusive Education Technologies: Emerging Opportunities for People with Visual Impairments. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, W13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Yash Mittal, Paridhi Toshniwal, Sonal Sharma, Deepika Singhal, Ruchi Gupta, and Vinay Kumar Mittal. 2015. A voice-controlled multifunctional smart home automation system. In India Conference (INDICON), 2015 Annual IEEE. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Michelle R. Nario-Redmond, Dobromir Gospodinov, and Angela Cobb. 2017. Crip for a day: The unintended negative consequences of disability simulations. Rehabilitation Psychology 62, 3 (2017), 324--333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Antti Oulasvirta, Esko Kurvinen, and Tomi Kankainen. 2003. Understanding contexts by being there: case studies in bodystorming. Personal and ubiquitous computing 7, 2 (2003), 125--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Rebecca Palmer, Pam Enderby, and Mark Hawley. 2007. Addressing the needs of speakers with longstanding dysarthria: computerized and traditional therapy compared. International journal of language & communication disorders 42, sup1 (2007), 61--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Martin Porcheron, Joel E Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Sarah Sharples. 2018. Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 640. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. François Portet, Michel Vacher, Caroline Golanski, Camille Roux, and Brigitte Meillon. 2013. Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly: acceptability and objection aspects. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 1 (2013), 127--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Alisha Pradhan, Kanika Mehta, and Leah Findlater. 2018. Accessibility Came by Accident: Use of Voice-Controlled Intelligent Personal Assistants by People with Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 459. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Amanda Purington, Jessie G Taft, Shruti Sannon, Natalya N Bazarova, and Samuel Hardman Taylor. 2017. Alexa is my new BFF: social roles, user satisfaction, and personification of the amazon echo. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2853--2859. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. RNIB. 2013. Key statistics on the prevalence and population of children and young people with vision impairment. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Nuzhah Gooda Sahib, Tony Stockman, Anastasios Tombros, and Oussama Metatla. 2013. Participatory design with blind users: a scenariobased approach. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 685--701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Eva-Lotta Sallnas, Jonas Moll, and Kerstin Severinson-Eklundh. 2007. Group work about geometrical concepts among blind and sighted pupils using haptic interfaces. In EuroHaptics Conference, 2007 and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics 2007. Second Joint. IEEE, 330--335. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. U Sharma and SJ Salend. 2016. Teaching Assistants in Inclusive Classrooms: A Systematic Analysis of the International Research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 41, 8 (2016), 118--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Arielle M. Silverman, Jennifer S. Pitonyak, Ian K. Nelson, Patricia N. Matsuda, Deborah Kartin, and Ivan R. Molton. 2017. Instilling positive beliefs about disabilities: pilot testing a novel experiential learning activity for rehabilitation students. Disability and Rehabilitation 0 (2017), 1--6. Voice User Interfaces in Schools CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland UKGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Miriam D Skjørten. 2001. Towards inclusion and enrichment. Education Special Needs Education: An Introduction. Oslo: Unipub Forlag (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Iris Soute, Susanne Lagerström, and Panos Markopoulos. 2013. Rapid prototyping of outdoor games for children in an iterative design process. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 74--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Tony Stockman and Oussama Metatla. 2008. The influence of screenreaders on web cognition. In Proceeding of Accessible design in the digital world conference (ADDW 2008), York, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Stergios Tegos, Stavros Demetriadis, and Anastasios Karakostas. 2015. Promoting academically productive talk with conversational agent interventions in collaborative learning settings. Computers & Education 87 (2015), 309--325. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Anja Thieme, Cecily Morrison, Nicolas Villar, Martin Grayson, and Siân Lindley. 2017. Enabling Collaboration in Learning Computer Programing Inclusive of Children with Vision Impairments. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 739--752. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Laura Pfeifer Vardoulakis, Lazlo Ring, Barbara Barry, Candace L Sidner, and Timothy Bickmore. 2012. Designing relational agents as long term social companions for older adults. In International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer, 289--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Giacomo Vivanti, Ed Duncan, Geraldine Dawson, and Sally J Rogers. 2017. Facilitating Learning Through Peer Interactions and Social Participation. In Implementing the Group-Based Early Start Denver Model for Preschoolers with Autism. Springer, 87--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Amber Wagner, Ramaraju Rudraraju, Srinivasa Datla, Avishek Banerjee, Mandar Sudame, and Jeff Gray. 2012. Programming by voice: a hands-free approach for motorically challenged children. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2087--2092. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Ru Zarin and Daniel Fallman. 2011. Through the troll forest: exploring tabletop interaction design for children with special cognitive needs. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3319--3322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Li Zhou, Amy T Parker, Derrick W Smith, and Nora Griffin-Shirley. 2011. Assistive technology for students with visual impairments: Challenges and needs in teachers' preparation programs and practice. J. Visual Impairment & Blindness 105, 4 (2011), 197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Voice User Interfaces in Schools: Co-designing for Inclusion with Visually-Impaired and Sighted Pupils

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2019
        9077 pages
        ISBN:9781450359702
        DOI:10.1145/3290605

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 May 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format