skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702511acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent decades, great technological strides have been made toward enabling people who are blind to live independent, successful lives. However, there has been relatively little progress towards understanding the social, collaborative needs of this population, particularly in the domestic setting. We conducted semi-structured interviews in the homes of 10 pairs of close companions in which one partner was blind and one was not. We found that partners engaged in collaborative accessibility by taking active roles in co-creating an accessible environment. Due to their different visual abilities, however, partners sometimes encountered difficulties managing divergent needs and engaging in shared experiences. We describe outstanding challenges to creating accessible shared home spaces and outline new research and technology opportunities for supporting collaborative accessibility in the home.

References

  1. Atkinson, M.T., Gucukoglu, S., Machin, C.H.C., and Lawrence, A.E. (2006). Making the mainstream accessible: What's in a game? Proc. ICCHP '06, 380387. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bigham, J.P., Jayant, C., Ji, H., Little, G., Miller, A., Miller, R.C., Miller, R., Tatarowicz, A., White, B., White, S., and Yeh, T. VizWiz: Nearly Real-Time Answers to Visual Questions. Proc. UIST '10, 333--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Borodin, Y., Bigham, J.P., Dausch, G., and Ramakrishnan, I.V. (2010). More than meets the eye: A survey of screen-reader browsing strategies. Proc. W4A '10, Article 13, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Branham, S.M., Harrison, S., and Hirsch, T. (2012). Designing for collocated couples. In Connecting families: The impact of new communication technologies on domestic life. London: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brush, A.J.B., and Inkpen, K.M. (2007). Yours, mine and ours? Sharing and use of technology in domestic environments. Proc. UbiComp '07, 109--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Charmaz, K. (2010). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Crabtree, R. and Rodden, T. (2004). Domestic Routines and Design for the Home. JCSCW 13(2), 191--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T., and Mariani, J. (2003). Informing the development of calendar systems for domestic use. Proc. ECSCW '03, 119--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Erickson, W., Lee, C., von Schrader, S. (2013). Disability statistics from the 2011 American Community Survey (ACS). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Employment and Disability Institute (EDI).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Flatla, D.R. and Gutwin, C. (2012). "So that's what you see": Building understanding with personalized simulations of colour vision deficiency. Proc. ASSETS '12, 167--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Grammenos, D., Savidis, A., Georgalis, Y., and Stephanidis, C. (2006). Access invaders: Developing a universally accessible action game. Proc. ICCHP '06, 388--395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hassenzahl, M., Heidecker, S., Eckoldt, K., Diefenbach, S., and Hillmann, U. (2012). All you need is love: Current strategies of mediating intimate relationships through technology. ACM TOCHI. 19(4). Article 30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hailpern, J., Danilevsky, M., Harris, A., Karahalios, K., Dell, G., and Hengst, J. (2011). ACES: Promoting empathy towards aphasia through language distortion emulation software. Proc. CHI '11, 609--618. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jacko, J.A., Leonard, V.K., and Scott, I.U. (2008). Perceptual impairments: new advancements promoting technological access. In The Human Computer Interaction Handbook. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kane, S.K., Jayant, C., Wobbrock, J.O., and Ladner, R.E. (2009). Freedom to roam: A study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. Proc. ASSETS '09, 115--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kaye, J. (2012). Love, Ritual & Videochat. in R. Harper, Ed. The Connected Home: The Future of Domestic Life, Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Massimi, M., Dimond, J.P., and Le Dantec, C.A. (2012). Finding a new normal: The role of technology in life disruptions. Proc. CWCW '12, 719--728. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mankoff, J., Hayes, G., Kasnitz, D. (2010). Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. Proc. ASSETS '10, 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mynatt, E.D., Rowan, J., Tran, Q., Abowd, G., Rogers, W., Siio, I. (2003). Designing home appliances for older adults. Cognitive Studies 10(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Neustaedter, C., Harrison, S., Sellen, A., eds. (2012). Connecting families: The impact of new communication technologies on domestic life. London: Springer. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Neustaedter, C., Brush, A.J.B., and Greenberg, S. (2009). The calendar is crucial: Coordination and awareness through the family calendar. ACM TOCHI. 16(1). Article 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Newell, A.F., and Gregor, P. (2000). "User sensitive inclusive design" in search of a new paradigm. Proc. CUU '00, 39--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Phillips, B., and Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology 5(1), 36--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Piper, A.M., Hollan, J. (2008). Supporting medical conversations between deaf and hearing individuals with tabletop displays. Proc. CSCW '08, 147--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Piper, A.M., Weibel, N., and Hollan, J. (2014). Designing audio-enhanced paper photos for older adult emotional wellbeing in communication therapy. IJHCS 72(8--9), 629--639.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Plaisant, C., Clamage, A., Hutchinson, H.B., Bederson, B.B., and Druin, A. (2006). Shared family calendars: Promoting symmetry and accessibility. ACM TOCHI 13(3), 313--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Plimmer, B., Crossan, A., Brewster, S.A., and Blagojevic, R. (2008). Multimodal collaborative handwriting training for visually-impaired people. Proc. CHI '08, 393--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rode, J.A. (2010). The roles that make the domestic work. Proc. CSCW '10, 381--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Savidis, A. and Stephanidis, C. (2005). Developing dual user interfaces for integrating blind and sighted users: The HOMER UIMS. Proc. CHI '95, 106--113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Shneiderman, B. (2000). Universal usability. CACM. 43:5, May 2000, 84--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Shinohara, K., and Tenenberg, J. (2007). Observing Sara: a case study of a blind person's interactions with technology. Proc. ASSETS '07, 171--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Shinohara, K., and Wobbrock, J.O. (2011). In the shadow of misperception: Assistive technology use and social interactions. Proc. CHI '11, 705--714. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sohn, T., Lee, L., Zhang, S., Dearman, D., and Truong, K. (2012). An examination of how households share and coordinate the completion of errands. Proc. CSCW '12, 729--738. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Thayer, A., Bietz, M.J., Derthick, K., and Lee, C.P. (2012). I love you, let's share calendars: calendar sharing as relationship work. Proc. CSCW '12, 749--758. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Thayer, A., Sirjani, B., and Lee, C.P. (2013). Recalibrating the ratio: enacting accountability in intimate relationships using shared calendars. Proc. CSCW '13, 203--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Thieme, A., Wallace, J., Thomas, J, Chen, K.L., Krämer, N., and Olivier, P. (2011). Lovers' box: Designing for reflection within romantic relationships. IJHS. 69(5), 283--297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Winberg, F. and Bowers, J. Assembling the senses: Towards the design of cooperative interfaces for visually impaired users. Proc. CSCW '04, 332--341. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Wobbrock, J.O., Kane, S.K., Gajos, K.Z., Harada, S., and Froehlich, J. (2011). Ability-based design: Concept, principles and examples. ACM TACCESS 3(3), Article 9, 27 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. World Health Organization. "Visual impairment and blindness Fact Sheet N°282," October 2013. {Online}. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/ind ex.html. {Accessed: Jun. 4, 2014}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang, R., Park, S., Mishra, S.R., Hong, Z., Newsom, C., Joo, H., Hofer, E. and Newman, M.W. (2011). Supporting spatial awareness and independent wayfinding for pedestrians with visual impairments. Proc. ASSETS '11, 27--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Zuckerman, D.M. (2004). Blind adults in America: Their lives and challenges. Washington, DC: National Research Center for Women & Families. {Online}. http://center4research.org/medical-care-foradults/disabilities/blind-adults-in-america-their-livesand-challenges/. {Accessed: Jun 4, 2014}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2015
        4290 pages
        ISBN:9781450331456
        DOI:10.1145/2702123

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 April 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader