skip to main content
10.1145/3315002.3317569acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SafeExit4AII: An Inclusive Indoor Emergency Evacuation System for People With Disabilities

Published:13 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Indoor wayfinding has remained a challenge for people with disabilities in unfamiliar environments. With some accessible indoor wayfinding systems coming to the fore recently, a major application of interest is that of emergency evacuation due to natural or man-made threats to safety. Independent emergency evacuations can be particularly challenging for persons with disabilities as there is usually a requirement to quickly gather and use alternative wayfinding information to exit the indoor space safely. This paper presents the design and evaluation of an inclusive emergency evacuation system called SafeExit4All that empowers people with disabilities (in addition to the general population) to independently find a safe exit under emergency scenarios. The Safe-Exit4All application drives an underlying accessible indoor wayfinding system with the necessary emergency evacuation system parameters customized to an individual's preferences and needs for exiting safely from a premise. Upon receiving an emergency alert, a user accesses the SafeExit4All system through an app on their smartphone that has access to real-time information about the threat, and simply follows on-screen turn-by-turn navigation instructions towards the closest safe exit. Human subject evaluations show Safe-Exit4All to be effective not just in terms of reducing evacuation time, but also in providing guidance that results in users taking deterministic, shorter, and safer paths to the exit most suitable for them.

References

  1. Directional sound evacuation. https://www.soundalert.com/way-finding.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Minnesota department of public safety. https://dps.mn.gov/Pages/default.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Nfpa journal. https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Publications/NFPA-Journal/2012/November-December-2012/The-Experts/In-Compliance.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. shooterdetectionsystems. https://shooterdetectionsystems.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Wayfindr open standard.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Ahmetovic, C. Gleason, C. Ruan, K. Kitani, H. Takagi, and C. Asakawa. Navcog: A navigational cognitive assistant for the blind. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI '16, pages 90--99, New York, NY, USA, 2016. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Ahmetovic, M. Murata, C. Gleason, E. Brady, H. Takagi, K. Kitani, and C. Asakawa. Achieving practical and accurate indoor navigation for people with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 14th Web for All Conference on The Future of Accessible Work, W4A '17, pages 31:1--31:10, New York, NY, USA, 2017. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. K. E. Boyce, T. J. Shields, and G. W. H. Silcock. Toward the characterization of building occupancies for fire safety engineering: Capability of people with disabilities to read and locate exit signs. Fire Technology, 35(1):79--86, Feb 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S. A. Cheraghi, V. Namboodiri, and L. Walker. Guidebeacon: Beacon-based indoor wayfinding for the blind, visually impaired, and disoriented. IEEE Pervasive Communications (PerCom), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. K. M. Christensen, S. D. Collins, J. M. Holt, and C. N. Phillips. The relationship between the design of the built environment and the ability to egress of individuals with disabilities. Review of Disability Studies, pages 24--34, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Davis and C. Weisbeck. Creating a supportive environment using cues for wayfinding in dementia. Journal of gerontological nursing, 42 3:36--44, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Hashemi and H. A. Karimi. Indoor spatial model and accessibility index for emergency evacuation of people with disabilities. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 30(4):04015056, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. Hashemi and H. A. Karimi. Collaborative personalized multi-criteria wayfinding for wheelchair users in outdoors. Transactions in GIS, 21(4):782--795, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J.-E. Kim, M. Bessho, S. Kobayashi, N. Koshizuka, and K. Sakamura. Navigating visually impaired travelers in a large train station using smartphone and bluetooth low energy. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC '16, pages 604--611, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. E. Kuligowski, R. Peacock, E. Wiess, and B. Hoskins. Stair evacuation of older adults and people with mobility impairments. Fire Safety Journal, 62:230--237, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. B. Liu, Y. bao Liu, and X. chuan Wu. Software design principles of intelligent evacuation indication system. Procedia Engineering, 52:214--219, 2013. 2012 International Conference on Performance-based Fire and Fire Protection Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. R. Manduchi and J. Coughlan. (Computer) vision without sight. Communications of the ACM, 55, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. D. Mishler and M. B. Neider. Improving wayfinding for older users with selective attention deficits. Ergonomics in Design, 25(1):11--16, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. Sagun, D. Bouchlaghem, and C. J. Anumba. Computer simulations vs. building guidance to enhance evacuation performance of buildings during emergency events. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 19(3):1007--1019, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. L. Shi, Q. Xie, X. Cheng, L. Chen, Y. Zhou, and R. Zhang. Developing a database for emergency evacuation model. Building and Environment, 44(8):1724--1729, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J. Xiong, K. Sundaresan, and K. Jamieson. ToneTrack: leveraging frequency-agile radios for time-based indoor wireless localization. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, MobiCom '15, pages 537--549, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. SafeExit4AII: An Inclusive Indoor Emergency Evacuation System for People With Disabilities

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          W4A '19: Proceedings of the 16th International Web for All Conference
          May 2019
          224 pages
          ISBN:9781450367165
          DOI:10.1145/3315002

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 May 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          W4A '19 Paper Acceptance Rate18of49submissions,37%Overall Acceptance Rate171of371submissions,46%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader