skip to main content
research-article

Danmaku: A New Paradigm of Social Interaction via Online Videos

Published:20 June 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Danmaku is a new commentary design for online videos. Unlike traditional forums where comments are displayed asynchronously below a video screen in order of when the comments are posted, danmaku comments are overlaid on the screen and displayed along with the video. This new design creates a pseudo-synchronous effect by displaying asynchronous comments with certain video segments in a synchronous fashion, and the links between danmaku comments and the video segments are defined by users. Danmaku is gaining popularity; however, little is known, compared to the traditional forum design, regarding how effective the new danmaku design is in promoting social interactions among online users. In this work, we collected 38,399 danmaku comments and 16,414 forum comments posted in 2017 on 30 popular videos on Bilibili.com. We compared user participation from different perspectives, e.g., number of comments, sentiment of the comments, language patterns, and ways of knowledge sharing. Our results showed that compared to the traditional linear design, the danmaku design significantly promoted user participation, i.e., there were more users and more comments in danmaku. Additionally, active users posted more positive comments, though they were anonymous; more linguistic memes were used in danmaku, suggesting that it was used to facilitate community-building. In addition to its effectiveness in promoting social interactions, our results also show that danmaku and forum designs play complementary roles in knowledge sharing, where danmaku comments involved more explicit (know-what) knowledge sharing, and forum comments exhibited more tacit (know-how) knowledge sharing. Our findings contribute to the development of social presence theory and have design implications for better social interaction via online videos.

References

  1. Syed Sibte Raza Abidi, Salah Hussini, Wimorat Sriraj, Somboon Thienthong, and Allen G. Finley. 2009. Knowledge sharing for pediatric pain management via a Web 2.0 framework. In Proceedings of the Medical Informatics Europe Conference (MIE’09). 287--291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Rami A. Al-Sa’Di and Jihad M. Hamdan. 2005. “Synchronous online chat” English: Computer-mediated communication. World English. 24, 4 (2005), 409--424.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Maryam Alavi and Dorothy E. Leidner. 2001. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly 25, 1 (2001), 107--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dorine C. Andrews. 2002. Audience-specific online community design. Commun. ACM 45, 4 (2002), 64--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Michael Argyle and Janet Dean. 1965. Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry (1965), 289--304.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Baidu Baike. 2017. Danmaku terms. Retrieved from: https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%BC%B9%E5%B9%95%E6%9C%AF%E8%AF%AD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mohammad Ehsan Basiri, Nasser Ghasem-Aghaee, and Ahmad Reza Naghsh-Nilchi. 2014. Exploiting reviewers’ comment histories for sentiment analysis. J. Inform. Sci. 40, 3 (2014), 313--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Christian Bauckhage. 2011. Insights into Internet memes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM’11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bilibili. 2009. Bilibili Danmaku video website. Retrieved from: http://www.bilibili.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Frank Biocca, Chad Harms, and Judee K. Burgoon. 2003. Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 12, 5 (2003), 456--480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. 1998. Organizing knowledge. Cali. Manag. Rev. 40, 3 (1998), 90--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Pablo Cesar and David Geerts. 2011. Past, present, and future of social TV: A categorization. In Proceedings of the Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC’11). IEEE, 347--351.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Yue Chen, Qin Gao, and Pei-Luen Patrick Rau. 2015. Understanding gratifications of watching Danmaku videos—Videos with overlaid comments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design. Springer, 153--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Anna Chmiel, Pawel Sobkowicz, Julian Sienkiewicz, Georgios Paltoglou, Kevan Buckley, Mike Thelwall, and Janusz A. Hołyst. 2011. Negative emotions boost user activity at BBC forum. Physica A: Statist. Mech. Appl. 390, 16 (2011), 2936--2944.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Seungwoo Choi and Aviv Segev. 2016. Finding informative comments for video viewing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data’16). IEEE, 2457--2465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kimberly M. Christopherson. 2007. The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.”Comput. Human Behav. 23, 6 (2007), 3038--3056.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ritesh Chugh. 2015. Do Australian universities encourage tacit knowledge transfer? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing (KMIS’15). 128--135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Michael A. Cusumano and Richard W. Selby. 1998. Microsoft Secrets: How the World’s Most Powerful Software Company Creates Technology, Shapes Markets, and Manages People. Simon and Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Manuela Delfino and Stefania Manca. 2007. The expression of social presence through the use of figurative language in a web-based learning environment. Comput. Human Behav. 23, 5 (2007), 2190--2211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. 2002. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved from: http://www.mw.com/home.htm (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tessa Dwyer. 2012. Fansub dreaming on ViKi: “Don’t just watch but help when you are free.”The Translator 18, 2 (2012), 217--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Stephanie Edgerly, Emily K. Vraga, Kajsa E. Dalrymple, Timothy Macafee, and Timothy K. F. Fung. 2013. Directing the dialogue: The relationship between YouTube videos and the comments they spur. J. Inform. Technol. Polit. 10, 3 (2013), 276--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Antonios Garas, David Garcia, Marcin Skowron, and Frank Schweitzer. 2012. Emotional persistence in online chatting communities. Sci. Rep. 2 (2012), 402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosanna E. Guadagno, Daniel M. Rempala, Shannon Murphy, and Bradley M. Okdie. 2013. What makes a video go viral? An analysis of emotional contagion and Internet memes. Comput. Human Behav. 29, 6 (2013), 2312--2319. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Charlotte N. Gunawardena. 1995. Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. Int. J. Edu. Telecomm. 1, 2 (1995), 147--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Russell Haines, Jill Hough, Lan Cao, and Douglas Haines. 2014. Anonymity in computer-mediated communication: More contrarian ideas with less influence. Group Dec. Negot. 23, 4 (2014), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sehee Han, Jinyoung Min, and Heeseok Lee. 2015. Antecedents of social presence and gratification of social connection needs in SNS: A study of Twitter users and their mobile and non-mobile usage. Int. J. Inform. Manag. 35, 4 (2015), 459--471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Maxwell F. Harper, Daniel Moy, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2009. Facts or friends?: Distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q&A sites. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (SIGCHI’09). ACM, 759--768.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Chip Heath and Victor Seidel. 2005. Language as a coordinating mechanism: How linguistic memes help direct appropriate action. In Proceedings of the Academy of Management Meetings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Shwu-Min Horng. 2016. A study of active and passive user participation in virtual communities. J. Electron. Comm. Res. 17, 4 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Carol Hostetter and Monique Busch. 2013. Community matters: Social presence and learning outcomes. J. Scholar. Teach. Learn. 13, 1 (2013), 77--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Craig D. Howard, Andrew F. Barrett, and Theodore W. Frick. 2010. Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre-service teachers’ comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. J. Edu. Comput. Res. 43, 1 (2010), 89--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Stefan Hrastinski. 2008. The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses. Inform. Manag. 45, 7 (2008), 499--506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Huixian Huang and Jie Zhu. 2015. Danmaku community’s meaning construction and psychological needs to Danmaku language. Young Journal. 9 (2015), 73--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Yun Huang, Yifeng Huang, Na Xue, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2017. Leveraging complementary contributions of different workers for efficient crowdsourcing of video captions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’17). ACM, 4617--4626.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Wijnand IJsselsteijn, Joy van Baren, and Froukje van Lanen. 2003. Staying in touch: Social presence and connectedness through synchronous and asynchronous communication media. Human-Comput. Interact.: Theor. Pract. (Part II) 2, 924 (2003), e928.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Yeonwook Im and Okhwa Lee. 2003. Pedagogical implications of online discussion for preservice teacher training. J. Res. Technol. Edu. 36, 2 (2003), 155--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Seung-A Annie Jin and Namkee Park. 2009. Parasocial interaction with my avatar: Effects of interdependent self-construal and the mediating role of self-presence in an avatar-based console game, Wii. CyberPsych. Behav. 12, 6 (2009), 723--727.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Tracy Kidder. 2011. The Soul of a New Machine. Back Bay Books. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Peter G. Kilner and Christopher M. Hoadley. 2005. Anonymity options and professional participation in an online community of practice. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years! International Society of the Learning Sciences, 272--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Jungjoo Kim, Yangyi Kwon, and Daeyeon Cho. 2011. Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Comput. Edu. 57, 2 (2011), 1512--1520. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Michele Knobel and Colin Lankshear. 2007. A New Literacies Sampler. Vol. 29. Peter Lang Publishing Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Alice Lam. 2000. Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework. Organiz. Studies 21, 3 (2000), 487--513.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Annie Lang. 2000. The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. J. Commun. 50, 1 (2000), 46--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Chei Sian Lee. 2012. Exploring emotional expressions on YouTube through the lens of media system dependency theory. New Media Societ. 14, 3 (2012), 457--475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Alexander Leichtle. 2012. The Games-Howell test in R. Retrieved from: http://www.gcf.dkf.unibe.ch/BCB/files/BCB_10Jan12_Alexander.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Chen Li. 2015. Can Danmaku interation be introduced into live telecast? News World 95--96 (2015), 80--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Xiao Liu and Gabriele De Seta. 2014. Chinese fansub groups as communites of practice: An ethnography of online language learning. China Online. Routledge, 139–154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Xiaojuan Ma and Nan Cao. 2017. Video-based evanescent, anonymous, asynchronous social interaction: Motivation and adaption to medium. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 770--782. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Zhihao Ma and Jinping Ge. 2014. The review of the Japanese animation barrage: A perspective of parasocial interaction. J. Int. Commun. 8 (2014), 116--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Mark Mabrito. 2006. A study of synchronous versus asynchronous collaboration in an online business writing class. Amer. J. Dist. Edu. 20, 2 (2006), 93--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Amy Madden, Ian Ruthven, and David McMenemy. 2013. A classification scheme for content analyses of YouTube video comments. J. Document. 69, 5 (2013), 693--714.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Richard E. Mayer. 2002. Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction: An example of the two-way street between cognition and instruction. New Direct. Teach. Learn. 2002, 89 (2002), 55--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Mahnaz Moallem. 2015. The impact of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools on learner self-regulation, social presence, immediacy, intimacy and satisfaction in collaborative online learning. Online J. Dist. Edu. e-Learn. 3, 3 (2015), 55--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Moegirlpedia. 2017. Danmaku terminologies. Retrieved from: https://zh.moegirl.org/%E5%BC%B9%E5%B9%95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Martin Mulligan. 1996. Superhighway to heaven. Financial Times (1996), 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Helen Nissenbaum. 1999. The meaning of anonymity in an information age. Inform. Societ. 15, 2 (1999), 141--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Rachel O’Donovan. 2016. “To boldly go where no psychologist has gone before”: Effects of participation in fandom activities on parasocial relationships. J. Appl. Psych. Soc. Sci. 2, 1 (2016), 41--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. University of Oklahoma. Institute of Group Relations and Muzafer Sherif. 1961. Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Vol. 10. University Book Exchange Norman, OK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Eli Omernick and Sara Owsley Sood. 2013. The impact of anonymity in online communities. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom’13). IEEE, 526--535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. David Osimo. 2008. Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How. Technical Report. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), JRC, European Commission, EUR 23358.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Xiaofu Ouyang. 2016. Study on Xiamen Tourist Environment Image Based on Visitors’ Microblog Data Analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation. Xiamen University, China.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Sirous Panahi, Jason Watson, and Helen Partridge. 2012. Social media and tacit knowledge sharing: Developing a conceptual model. World Acad. Sci., Eng. Technol. 64 (2012), 1095--1102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Roy Pea, Robb Lindgren, and Joseph Rosen. 2008. Cognitive technologies for establishing, sharing and comparing perspectives on video over computer networks. Soc. Sci. Inform. 47, 3 (2008), 353--370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Xixian Peng, Yuxiang Chris Zhao, and Hock-Hai Teo. 2016. Understanding young people’s use of Danmaku websites: The effect of perceived coolness and subcultural identi. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS’16). 252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Lionel P. Robert and Alan R. Dennis. 2005. Paradox of richness: A cognitive model of media choice. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 48, 1 (2005), 10--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Hamano Satoshi. 2008. How information systems have been designed so far. In Architecture of the Ecosystem. BIGART. ISBN: 978-4-7571-0245-3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Frank Schweitzer and David Garcia. 2010. An agent-based model of collective emotions in online communities. Euro. Phys. J. B 77, 4 (2010), 533--545.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. John Seabrook. 1994. Rocking in Shangri-la. The New Yorker (1994), 64--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Yi Shen, Hock Chan, and Iris Hung. 2014. Let the comments fly: The effects of flying commentary presentation on consumer judgment. International Journal of Systems Science 12, 12 (2014), 1469–1475.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Limor Shifman. 2012. An anatomy of a YouTube meme. New Media Societ. 14, 2 (2012), 187--203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Limor Shifman. 2013. Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 18, 3 (2013), 362--377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. John Short, Ederyn Williams, and Bruce Christie. 1976. The social psychology of telecommunications. (1976).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Katharina Steininger, David Ruckel, Ewald Dannerer, and Friedrich Roithmayr. 2010. Healthcare knowledge transfer through a Web 2.0 portal: An Austrian approach. Int. J. Health. Technol. Manag. 11, 1--2 (2010), 13--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Emily Sun, Rodrigo de Oliveira, and Joshua Lewandowski. 2017. Challenges on the journey to co-watching YouTube. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 783--793. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Bosiljka Tadić, Vladimir Gligorijević, Marija Mitrović, and Milovan Šuvakov. 2013. Co-evolutionary mechanisms of emotional bursts in online social dynamics and networks. Entropy 15, 12 (2013), 5084--5120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. John C. Tang, Gina Venolia, and Kori M. Inkpen. 2016. Meerkat and periscope: I stream, you stream, apps stream for live streams. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, 4770--4780.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Yan Tang, Yibing Gong, Li Xu, Qingheng Zhang, Huaxin Liu, Sheng Wang, Qian Wang, and Xiaofeng Gao. 2017. Is Danmaku an effective way for promoting event based social network? In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 319--322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Mike Thelwall, Pardeep Sud, and Farida Vis. 2012. Commenting on YouTube videos: From Guatemalan rock to el big bang. J. Amer. Societ. Inform. Sci. Technol. 63, 3 (2012), 616--629. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Yuan Tian. 2011. Fansub Cyber Culture in China. Georgetown University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Chih-Hsiung Tu. 2000. On-line learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 23, 1 (2000), 27--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Chih-Hsiung Tu. 2001. How Chinese perceive social presence: An examination of interaction in online learning environment. Edu. Media Int. 38, 1 (2001), 45--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Chih-Hsiung Tu. 2002. The impacts of text-based CMC on online social presence. J. Interact. Online Learn. 1, 2 (2002), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Chih-Hsiung Tu and Marina McIsaac. 2002. The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. Amer. J. Dist. Edu. 16, 3 (2002), 131--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Peiyun Tu, Meiling Chen, Chilan Yang, and Haochuan Wang. 2016. Co-viewing room: Mobile TV content sharing in social chat. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). ACM, 1615--1621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Cindy Boyles Tucey. 2010. Online vs. face-to-face deliberation on the global warming and stem cell issues. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Olga Uryupina, Barbara Plank, Aliaksei Severyn, Agata Rotondi, and Alessandro Moschitti. 2014. SenTube: A corpus for sentiment analysis on YouTube social media. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14). Citeseer, 4244--4249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Dorothy Van Soest, Robert Canon, and Darlene Grant. 2000. Using an interactive website to educate about cultural diversity and societal oppression. J. Soc. Work Edu. 36, 3 (2000), 463--479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Anthony J. Viera, Joanne M. Garrett et al. 2005. Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Fam. Med. 37, 5 (2005), 360--363.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Junhua Wang and Hua Wang. 2015. From a marketplace to a cultural space: Online meme as an operational unit of cultural transmission. J. Tech. Writ. Commun. 45, 3 (2015), 261--274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Yang Wang, Huichuan Xia, and Yun Huang. 2016. Examining American and Chinese Internet users’ contextual privacy preferences of behavioral advertising. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing. ACM, 539--552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Jerry Wellman. 2009. Organizational Learning: How Companies and Institutions Manage and Apply Knowledge. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Miaomiao Wen, Diyi Yang, and Carolyn Rose. 2014. Sentiment analysis in MOOC discussion forums: What does it tell us? In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Fons Wijnhoven. 2008. Manufacturing knowledge work: The European perspective. In Methods and Tools for Effective Knowledge Life-cycle-management. Springer, 23--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Wikipedia. 2018. ACG (subculture). Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACG_(subculture).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Qunfang Wu, Yisi Sang, Shan Zhang, and Yun Huang. 2018. Danmaku vs. forum comments: Understanding user participation and knowledge sharing in online videos. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork. ACM, 209--218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Yaxing Yao, Jennifer Bort, and Yun Huang. 2017. Understanding Danmaku’s potential in online video learning. In Proceedings of the Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’17). ACM, 3034--3040.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Bingjie Yu and Leon Watts. 2017. Designing commenting mechanisms for dynamic media: Synchronous overlay and adjacent scrollable. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 18--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Yuxiang Zhao and Jian Tang. 2016. Exploring the motivational affordances of Danmaku video sharing websites: Evidence from gamification design. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 467--479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Danmaku: A New Paradigm of Social Interaction via Online Videos

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Social Computing
      ACM Transactions on Social Computing  Volume 2, Issue 2
      June 2019
      123 pages
      EISSN:2469-7826
      DOI:10.1145/3340675
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 June 2019
      • Accepted: 1 April 2019
      • Revised: 1 March 2019
      • Received: 1 February 2018
      Published in tsc Volume 2, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format