skip to main content
article
Free Access

Scheduling independent tasks to reduce mean finishing time

Published:01 July 1974Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Sequencing to minimize mean finishing time (or mean time in system) is not only desirable to the user, but it also tends to minimize at each point in time the storage required to hold incomplete tasks. In this paper a deterministic model of independent tasks is introduced and new results are derived which extend and generalize the algorithms known for minimizing mean finishing time. In addition to presenting and analyzing new algorithms it is shown that the most general mean-finishing-time problem for independent tasks is polynomial complete, and hence unlikely to admit of a non-enumerative solution.

References

  1. 1 Conway, R.W., Maxwell, W.L., and Miller, L.W. Theorv ol" Scheduling. Addison-Wesley, New York, 1900.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 Ford, L.R., and Fulkerson, D.R. Flows in Networks. Princeton U. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 Bruno, J. A scheduling algorithm for minimizing mean flow time. Tech. Rep. #141, Comput. Sci. Dept., Penn State U., University Park, Penna., July 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 Cook, S.A. The complexity of theorem proving procedures. 3rd ACM Syrup. on Theory of Computing, Shaker Heights, Oh., May 1971, pp. 151-158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5 Karp, R.M. Reducibility between combinatorial problems. In Complexity o/Computer Computations, R.E. Milker and J.W. Thatcher (Eds) Plenum Press, New York 1972, pp. 85-103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 Sahni, S. Some related problems from network flows, game theory and integer programming. 13th Ann. Syrup. on Switching and Automata Theory, Oct. 1972, pp. 130-139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7 Ullman, J.D. Polynomial complete scheduling problems TR9. Dept. of Comput. Sci., U. of California at Berkeley, Mar. 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 Graham, R.L. Bounds for certain multiprocessing anomalies. Bell Syst. Tech J. (Nov. 1966), 1563-1581.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. 9 Graham, R.L. Bounds on multiprocessing timing anomalies. SIAM J. Appl. Math 17, 2 (Mar. 1969), 416-429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10 Coffman, E.G. On a conjecture concerning the comparison of SPT and LPT scheduling. Tech. Rep. #140, Comput. Sci. Dept., Penn State U., University Park, Penna., July 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Scheduling independent tasks to reduce mean finishing time

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image Communications of the ACM
            Communications of the ACM  Volume 17, Issue 7
            July 1974
            63 pages
            ISSN:0001-0782
            EISSN:1557-7317
            DOI:10.1145/361011
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 1974 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 July 1974

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader