skip to main content
10.1145/502716.502722acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A writer's collaborative assistant

Published:13 January 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

In traditional human-computer interfaces, a human master directs a computer system as a servant, telling it not only what to do, but also how to do it. Collaborative interfaces attempt to realign the roles, making the participants collaborators in solving the person's problem. This paper describes Writer's Aid, a system that deploys AI planning techniques to enable it to serve as an author's collaborative assistant. Writer's Aid differs from previous collaborative interfaces in both the kinds of actions the system partner takes and the underlying technology it uses to do so. While an author writes a document, Writer's Aid helps in identifying and inserting citation keys and by autonomously finding and caching potentially relevant papers and their associated bibliographic information from various on-line sources. This autonomy, enabled by the use of a planning system at the core of Writer's Aid, distinguishes this system from other collaborative interfaces. The collaborative design and its division of labor result in more efficient operation: faster and easier writing on the user's part and more effective information gathering on the part of the system. Subjects in our laboratory user study found the system effective and the interface intuitive and easy to use.

References

  1. 1.Yigal Arens, Craig A.Knoblock,and Wei-Min Shen. Query reformulation for dynamic information integration.Journal of Intelligent Information Systems -Special Issue n Intelligent Information Integration,6(2/3):99-130,1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Tamara Babaian. Knowledge Representation and Open World Planning Using -forms PhD thesis,Tufts University,2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Greg Barish,Craig A.Knoblock,Yi-Shin Chen, Steven Minton,Andrew Philpot,and Cyrus Shahabi. The TheaterLoc virtual application.In AAAI/IAAI, pages 980-987,2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Jay Budzik and Kristian Hammond.User interactions with everyday applications as context for just in time information access.In Proceedings of IUI 2000,2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.P.Cohen and H.Levesque.Teamwork.Nous , 25:487-512,1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 6.O. Etzioni,K.Golden,and D.Weld.Sound and efficient closed-world reasoning for planning. Artificial Intelligence ,89(1-2):113-148,January 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Barbara J.Grosz and Sarit Kraus.The Evolution of Shared Plans.In A.Rao and M.Wooldridge,editors, F undati ns of Rational Agency ,pages 227-262. Kluwer Academic Press,1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.D.Kinny,M.Ljungberg,A.S.Rao,E.Sonenberg, G.Tidhar,and E.Werner.Planned team activity.In C.Castelfranchi and E.Werner,editors,Artificial Social Systems,Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI-830),Amsterdam,The Netherlands,1994. Springer Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Thomas Kistler and Hannes Marais.WebL -a programming language for the web.Computer Networks and ISDN Systems ,30(1-7):259-270,1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.V.Lesser,B.Horling,F.Klassner,A.Raja, T.Wagner,and S.Zhang.Big:An agent for resource-bounded information gathering and decision making Artificial Intelligence ,118:197-244, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.A.Levy and D. Weld, editors. Artificial Intelligence, volume 118. Elsevier Science, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.K.E.Lochbaum.A collaborative planning model of intentional structure.Computational Linguistics ,24, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.C.Ortiz and B.J.Grosz.Interpreting information requests in context:a collaborative web interface for distance learning.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Journal,to appear,2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.C.Rich and C.Sidner.Segmented interaction history in a collaborative interface agent.In Proceedings of IUI'97 ,1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.C.Rich,C.Sidner,and N.Lesh.Collagen:Applying collaborative discourse theory to human-computer interaction AI Magazine,Special Issue on Intelligent User Interfaces,2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.K.Ryall,J.Marks,and S.Shieber.An interactive constraint based system for drawing graphs.In Proceedings of UIST,1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.S.Shieber A call for collaborative interfaces.ACM Computing Surveys, 28A (electronic), 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A writer's collaborative assistant

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          IUI '02: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
          January 2002
          253 pages
          ISBN:1581134592
          DOI:10.1145/502716

          Copyright © 2002 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 January 2002

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          IUI '02 Paper Acceptance Rate49of111submissions,44%Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader