Abstract
While there is a rich history of studies involving robots and individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), few of these studies have made substantial impact in the clinical research community. In this paper we first examine how differences in approach, study design, evaluation, and publication practices have hindered uptake of these research results. Based on ten years of collaboration, we suggest a set of design principles that satisfy the needs (both academic and cultural) of both the robotics and clinical autism research communities. Using these principles, we present a study that demonstrates a quantitatively measured improvement in human-human social interaction for children with ASD, effected by interaction with a robot.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
- Andrews, S., Warner, J., & Stewart, R. (1986). EMG biofeedback and relaxation in the treatment of hyperfunctional dysphonia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 21(3), 353--369.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network (ADDM), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). Prevalence of the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in multiple areas of the United States, 2004 and 2006. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/addm.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Bosseler, A., & Massaro, D. W. (2003). Development and evaluation of a computer-animated tutor for vocabulary and language learning in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(6), 653--672.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diehl, J. J., Schmitt, L. M., Villano, M., & Crowell, C. R. (2012). The clinical use of robots for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A critical review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(1), 249--262.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elliott, C. D. (2007). Differential Ability Scales-II (DAS-II). San Antonio, TX: Pearson. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/HAIWEB/Cultures/en-us/Productdetail.htm?Pid=015-8338-820Google Scholar
- Feil-Seifer, D., & Matarić, M. J. (2011). Automated detection and classification of positive vs. negative robot interactions with children with autism using distance-based features. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI '11 (pp. 323--330). Lausanne, Switzerland: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gentil, M., Aucouturier, J.-L., Delong, V., & Sambuis, E. (1994). EMG biofeedback in the treatment of dysarthria. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 46(4), 188--192.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hagedorn, J., Hailpern, J., & Karahalios, K. G. (2008). VCode and VData: Illustrating a new framework for supporting the video annotation workflow. Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI '08 (pp. 317--321). Napoli, Italy: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Happé, F., Ronald, A., & Plomin, R. (2006). Time to give up on a single explanation for autism. Nature Neuroscience, 9(10), 1218--1220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hetzroni, O., & Tannous, J. (2004). Effects of a Computer-Based Intervention Program on the Communicative Functions of Children with Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 95--113.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee. (2011). 2011 IACC strategic plan for autism spectrum disorder research.Google Scholar
- Joseph, R. M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (1997). An investigation of attention and affect in children with autism and Down Syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27(4), 385--396.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2006). Atypical epigenesis. Developmental Science, 10(1), 84--88.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kasari, C., Sigman, M., Mundy, P., & Yirmiya, N. (1990). Affective sharing in the context of joint attention interactions of normal, autistic, and mentally retarded children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20(1), 87--100.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kim, E. S., Leyzberg, D., Tsui, K. M., & Scassellati, B. (2009). How people talk when teaching a robot. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, HRI '09 (pp. 23--30). New York, NY, USA: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., Pickles, A., et al. (2000). The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule---Generic: A Standard Measure of Social and Communication Deficits Associated with the Spectrum of Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205--223.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Couteur, A. (1994). Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(5), 659--685.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martin, F., & Farnum, J. (2002). Animal-assisted therapy for children with pervasive developmental disorders. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 24(6), 657--670.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mullen, E. M. (1995). Mullen Scales of Early Learning (AGS.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Parsons, S., & Mitchell, P. (2002). The potential of virtual reality in social skills training for people with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(5), 430--443.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Patterson, D., Snyder, L., & Ullman, J. (1999). Best practices memo: Evaluating computer scientists and engineers for promotion and tenure. Computing Research News.Google Scholar
- Paul, R. (2005). Assessing communication in autism spectrum disorders. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 799--816). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- Paul, R., Augustyn, A., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. R. (2005). Perception and production of prosody by speakers with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(2), 205--220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Prelock, P. A., Paul, R., & Allen, E. M. (2011). Evidence-based treatments in communication for children with autism spectrum disorders. In B. Reichow, P. Doehring, D. V. Cicchetti, & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Evidence-based practices and treatments for children with autism (pp. 93--169). New York, NY: Springer US. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/g520308543808731/abstract/Google Scholar
- Redefer, L., & Goodman, J. (1989). Brief report: Pet-facilitated therapy with autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 19(3), 461--467.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reichow, B., Volkmar, F., & Cicchetti, D. V. (2008). Development of the evaluative method for evaluating and determining evidence-based practices in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(7), 1311--1319.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reichow, B., & Volkmar, F. R. (2011). Evidence-based practices in autism: Where we started. In B. Reichow, P. Doehring, D. V. Cicchetti, & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Evidence-based practices and treatments for children with autism (pp. 3--24). New York, NY: Springer US. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/w34707658g6461g5/abstract/Google Scholar
- Ricks, D. J., & Colton, M. B. (2010). Trends and considerations in robot-assisted autism therapy. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 4354--4359). Anchorage, AK: IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Riek, L. D. (2012). Wizard of Oz Studies in HRI: A Systematic Review and New Reporting Guidelines. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(1), 119--136. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rutter, M., Bailey, A., & Lord, C. (2003). Social Communication Questionnaire: SCQ (W-381). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services. Retrieved from http://portal.wpspublish.com/portal/page?_pageid=53,70432&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTALGoogle Scholar
- Scassellati, B. (2005). Quantitative metrics of social response for autism diagnosis. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ROMAN 2005 (pp. 585 -- 590).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scassellati, B., Admoni, H., & Matarić, M. J. (2012). Robots for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14.Google Scholar
- Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (1986). The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS): For diagnostic screening and classification of autism. New York, NY: Irvington.Google Scholar
- Silver, M., & Oakes, P. (2001). Evaluation of a new computer intervention to teach people with autism or asperger syndrome to recognize and predict emotions in others. Autism, 5(3), 299 --316.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steinfeld, A., Jenkins, O. C., & Scassellati, B. (2009). The oz of wizard: simulating the human for interaction research. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, HRI '09 (pp. 101--108). San Diego, CA: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Strickland, D. (1997). Virtual reality for the treatment of autism. In G. Riva (Ed.), Virtual reality in neuro-psycho-physiology: cognitive, clinical and methodological issues in assessment and rehabilitation (pp. 81--86). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.Google Scholar
- Tapus, A., Matarić, M. J., & Scassellati, B. (2007). Socially assistive robotics {Grand challenges of robotics}. Robotics Automation Magazine, IEEE, 14(1), 35 --42.Google Scholar
- Volkmar, F. R., & Klin, A. (2005). Issues in the classification of autism and related conditions. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (3rd ed., Vols. 1--2, Vol. 1, pp. 335--364). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- Volkmar, F. R., Lord, C., Bailey, A., Schultz, R. T., & Klin, A. (2004). Autism and pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 135--170.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walker, D. R., Thompson, A., Zwaigenbaum, L., Goldberg, J., Bryson, S. E., Mahoney, W. J., Strawbridge, C., et al. (2004). Specifying PDD-NOS: A Comparison of PDD-NOS, Asperger Syndrome, and Autism. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(2), 172--180.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/HAIWEB/Cultures/en-us/Productdetail.htm?Pid=015-8981-502Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV) (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/HAIWEB/Cultures/en-us/Productdetail.htm?Pid=015-8979-044Google Scholar
- Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. R. (2001). Gray Oral Reading Test (GORT-4) (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessment. Retrieved from http://psychcorp.pearsonassessments.com/HAIWEB/Cultures/en-us/Productdetail.htm?Pid=015-8116-577&Mode=summaryGoogle Scholar
- Yirmiya, N., Kasari, C., Sigman, M., & Mundy, P. (1989). Facial expressions of affect in autistic, mentally retarded and normal children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30(5), 725--735.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Teleoperation Interface Usage in Robot-Assisted Childhood ASD Therapy
HRI '21 Companion: Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionTherapist-operated robots can play a uniquely impactful role in helping children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) practice and acquire social skills. While extensive research within Human Robot Interaction has focused on teleoperation interfaces for ...
Analyzing Teleoperation Interface Usage of Robots in Therapy for Children with Autism
IDC '21: Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children ConferenceTherapist-operated robots can play a uniquely impactful role in helping children with autism practice and acquire social skills. While extensive research within Human-Robot Interaction has focused on teleoperation interfaces for robots in general, ...
Do Sensory Preferences of Children with Autism Impact an Imitation Task with a Robot?
HRI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionImitation is of major importance during social interactions, would it be between humans or between a human and a robot. This is even more true when considering users with special needs. In this paper, we describe an experimental imitation task protocol ...
Comments