Reply to “Comment on ‘Optimal probe wave function of weak-value amplification’ ”

Yuki Susa, Yutaka Shikano, and Akio Hosoya
Phys. Rev. A 87, 046102 – Published 12 April 2013

Abstract

It is pointed out that the “counterexample” presented in the Comment is a family of probe wave functions which are increasingly broad as the shift becomes large. Furthermore, the author's variational calculation is not correct in the sense that we have to gauge fix the freedom of the phase translation. It is shown that there are two kinds of solutions, normalizable and un-normalizable. The former is our optimal solution, and the latter is what he found. It seems only the former is relevant from a practical point of view.

  • Received 3 November 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.046102

©2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Yuki Susa1,*, Yutaka Shikano2,†, and Akio Hosoya1,‡

  • 1Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
  • 2Institute for Molecular Science, Okazaki, Aichi, Japan

  • *susa@th.phys.titech.ac.jp
  • yshikano@ims.ac.jp
  • ahosoya@th.phys.titech.ac.jp

Comments & Replies

Comment on “Optimal probe wave function of weak-value amplification”

Antonio Di Lorenzo
Phys. Rev. A 87, 046101 (2013)

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Original Article

Optimal probe wave function of weak-value amplification

Yuki Susa, Yutaka Shikano, and Akio Hosoya
Phys. Rev. A 85, 052110 (2012)

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 87, Iss. 4 — April 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×