Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2024; 40(03): 294-303
DOI: 10.1055/a-2218-7060
Original Article

Imaging Nasal Obstruction: An Objective Evaluation for a Subjective Complaint

Vasco R.L.S. Abreu
1   Neuroradiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
,
João A. Xavier
2   Neuroradiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, ICBAS—School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Nasal obstruction (NO) is a common clinical symptom characterized by a subjective sensation of insufficient airflow through the nasal cavity and may result from various factors, including changes in nasal anatomy, inflammatory conditions, tumoral lesions, and other etiologies. While a thorough medical history and physical examination can often identify its cause, imaging is usually necessary to fully understand the problem. Computed tomography (CT) is the primary imaging modality used to evaluate the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, allowing for the identification of potential causes and structural abnormalities. However, when soft tissue characterization is required, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is also useful. Understanding the anatomical and pathological basis of NO is crucial for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Imaging techniques provide valuable information for identifying the underlying causes of NO and guiding treatment decisions. This article reviews the normal anatomy of the nasal cavity and adjacent paranasal sinuses as well as the several conditions that may affect breathing comfort (tumors, inflammatory diseases, bony and cartilaginous anatomical variants, and “nonobstructive” mucosal thickenings), showing their normal presentation on CT and MRI.

Keywords

nasal obstruction - CT - MRI


Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
28 November 2023

Article published online:
10 January 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Osborn JL, Sacks R. Chapter 2: nasal obstruction. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2013; 27 (3, Suppl 1): S7-S8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hsu DW, Suh JD. Anatomy and physiology of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2018; 51 (05) 853-865
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Anon JB. Upper respiratory infections. Am J Med 2010; 123 (4, Suppl): S16-S25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Joshi VM, Sansi R. Imaging in sinonasal inflammatory disease. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2015; 25 (04) 549-568
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Graviero G, Guastini L, Mora R, Salzano G, Salzano FA. The role of three-dimensional CT in the evaluation of nasal structures and anomalies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 268 (08) 1163-1167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 O'Brien Sr WT, Hamelin S, Weitzel EK. The preoperative sinus CT: avoiding a “CLOSE” call with surgical complications. Radiology 2016; 281 (01) 10-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shapiro MD, Som PM. MRI of the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity. Radiol Clin North Am 1989; 27 (02) 447-475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sahin-Yilmaz A, Naclerio RM. Anatomy and physiology of the upper airway. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2011; 8 (01) 31-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wexler DB, Davidson TM. The nasal valve: a review of the anatomy, imaging, and physiology. Am J Rhinol 2004; 18 (03) 143-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cho GS, Kim JH, Jang YJ. Correlation of nasal obstruction with nasal cross-sectional area measured by computed tomography in patients with nasal septal deviation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2012; 121 (04) 239-245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Camacho M, Zaghi S, Certal V. et al. Inferior turbinate classification system, grades 1 to 4: development and validation study. Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (02) 296-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Xavier R, Azeredo-Lopes S, Menger DJ, Cyrne de Carvalho H, Spratley J. Which nasal airway dimensions correlate with nasal airflow and with nasal breathing sensation?. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2021; DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0148.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Whyte A, Boeddinghaus R. Imaging of adult nasal obstruction. Clin Radiol 2020; 75 (09) 688-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Dykewicz MS, Hamilos DL. Rhinitis and sinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125 (2, Suppl 2): S103-S115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Stewart M, Ferguson B, Fromer L. Epidemiology and burden of nasal congestion. Int J Gen Med 2010; 3: 37-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Daines SM, Orlandi RR. Chronic rhinosinusitis. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2012; 20 (01) 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rout MR, Mohanty D, Vijaylaxmi Y, Bobba K, Metta C. Adenoid hypertrophy in adults: a case series. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 65 (03) 269-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bhattacharyya N. Ambulatory sinus and nasal surgery in the United States: demographics and perioperative outcomes. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (03) 635-638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Teixeira J, Certal V, Chang ET, Camacho M. Nasal septal deviations: a systematic review of classification systems. Plast Surg Int 2016; 2016: 7089123
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Salihoglu M, Cekin E, Altundag A, Cesmeci E. Examination versus subjective nasal obstruction in the evaluation of the nasal septal deviation. Rhinology 2014; 52 (02) 122-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Meusel T, Negoias S, Scheibe M, Hummel T. Topographical differences in distribution and responsiveness of trigeminal sensitivity within the human nasal mucosa. Pain 2010; 151 (02) 516-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Liu SC, Lu HH, Cheng LH. et al. Identification of the cold receptor TRPM8 in the nasal mucosa. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2015; 29 (04) e112-e116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Jones AS, Wight RG, Durham LH. The distribution of thermoreceptors within the nasal cavity. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1989; 14 (03) 235-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Saedi B, Rashan AR, Lipan M, Nayak JV, Most SP. Consistent ipsilateral development of the posterior extension of the quadrangular cartilage and bony spur formation in nasal septal deviation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 152 (03) 444-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Stallman JS, Lobo JN, Som PM. The incidence of concha bullosa and its relationship to nasal septal deviation and paranasal sinus disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25 (09) 1613-1618
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Măru N, Rusu MC, Săndulescu M. Variant anatomy of nasal turbinates: supreme, superior and middle conchae bullosae, paradoxical superior and inferior turbinates, and middle accessory turbinate. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2015; 56 (03) 1223-1226
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lowe LH, Booth TN, Joglar JM, Rollins NK. Midface anomalies in children. Radiographics 2000; 20 (04) 907-922 , quiz 1106–1107, 1112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Belden CJ, Mancuso AA, Schmalfuss IM. CT features of congenital nasal piriform aperture stenosis: initial experience. Radiology 1999; 213 (02) 495-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Smith JK, Castillo M, Mukherji S, Buenting J, Drake A. Imaging of nasopharyngeal atresia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16 (09) 1936-1938
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Spataro E, Piccirillo JF, Kallogjeri D, Branham GH, Desai SC. Revision rates and risk factors of 175 842 patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (03) 212-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kobayashi T, Moody S, Komori M, Jibatake A, Yaegashi M. Early stage relapsing polychondritis diagnosed by nasal septum biopsy. Case Rep Med 2015; 2015: 307868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hansson AS, Lu S, Holmdahl R. Extra-articular cartilage affected in collagen-induced, but not pristane-induced, arthritis models. Clin Exp Immunol 2002; 127 (01) 37-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kahana-Zweig R, Geva-Sagiv M, Weissbrod A, Secundo L, Soroker N, Sobel N. Measuring and characterizing the human nasal cycle. PLoS One 2016; 11 (10) e0162918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Jankowski R, Nguyen DT, Russel A, Toussaint B, Gallet P, Rumeau C. Chronic nasal dysfunction. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2018; 135 (01) 41-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ramey JT, Bailen E, Lockey RF. Rhinitis medicamentosa. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2006; 16 (03) 148-155
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ginat DT, Schatz CJ. Imaging features of midface injectable fillers and associated complications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34 (08) 1488-1495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Mundada P, Kohler R, Boudabbous S, Toutous Trellu L, Platon A, Becker M. Injectable facial fillers: imaging features, complications, and diagnostic pitfalls at MRI and PET CT. Insights Imaging 2017; 8 (06) 557-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Cakmak O, Coşkun M, Celik H, Büyüklü F, Ozlüoğlu LN. Value of acoustic rhinometry for measuring nasal valve area. Laryngoscope 2003; 113 (02) 295-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Tretiakow D, Tesch K, Meyer-Szary J, Markiet K, Skorek A. Three-dimensional modeling and automatic analysis of the human nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses using the computational fluid dynamics method. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278 (05) 1443-1453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar