Facial Plast Surg 2015; 31(05): 491-503
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1566270
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Facelift 2015

Chiara Botti
1   Villa Bella Clinic, Salò, Italy
,
Giovanni Botti
1   Villa Bella Clinic, Salò, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 November 2015 (online)

Abstract

Among the current topics, one that is more commonly discussed is that of the mini-invasive or “soft” techniques that seem to attract doctors and patients more than real surgery. We instead propose a relatively aggressive technique that can really rejuvenate the faces and necks of our patients. Are we not in step with the times? The problem is, unfortunately, that until now there is nothing that, without anesthesia, swelling, bruising, and so forth, can magically bring about the result of a well-done facelift. There are no “thread lifts” or fillings or endopeels or weird devices using radiofrequency, ultrasound, or shock waves—the list could go on forever—that can compare with a properly performed facelift. But how should a good facelift be done? For many years, we have been using the protocol described in this article, and the request for facelifts has not dropped, despite never having used advertising in our practice. We want to give our patients natural and long-lasting results, and for this purpose we must use an effective and individualized technique, even if it implies a relatively long down time. In this article, we describe the technical choices that we have made based on a long clinical experience and on detailed anatomical studies. Most difficulties that are encountered with this type of surgery concern finding the proper dissection plane and the proper amount of traction to be applied to the different tissue layers. It is indeed not at all easy, especially for a beginner, to be sure that one has reached the proper depth of dissection, which will allow the elevation of the superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in a risk-free manner even in the area which is medial to the anterior border of the parotid gland where the facial nerve is no longer protected by the gland itself. We will nevertheless try to provide precise indications concerning every important detail needed to perform the operation safely.

 
  • References

  • 1 Wu WT. Barbed sutures in facial rejuvenation. Aesthet Surg J 2004; 24 (6) 582-587
  • 2 DeLorenzi C. Barbed sutures: rationale and technique. Aesthet Surg J 2006; 26: 223-229
  • 3 Paul MD. Complications of barbed sutures. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32 (1) 149
  • 4 Sulamanidze MA, Paikidze TG, Sulamanidze GM, Neigel JM. Facial lifting with “APTOS” threads: featherlift. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2005; 38 (5) 1109-1117
  • 5 Trévidic P, Alkebaisi A. Facial threads for face lift [in French]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2006; 127 (1–2) 57-59
  • 6 Bacci PA. Chirurgia Estetica Mini Invasiva Con Fili Di Sostegno. Collana di Arti, Pensiero e Scienza; 2006. ; Minelli, Arezzo
  • 7 Botti G, Pelle Ceravolo M. Midface and Neck Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Parma, Italy: Acta Medica Edizioni; 2012
  • 8 Botti G. Facelifts and their long term results. Am J Cosmet Surg 1999; 16: 129
  • 9 Botti G. Endoscopy in facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (2) 593-595
  • 10 Botti G. The future of face lifts: a comparison between traditional surgery and advanced techniques. Facial Plast Surg 1996; 12 (4) 379-387
  • 11 Botti G. Chirurgia Estetica dell'Invecchiamento Facciale. Piccin, Padova; 1995
  • 12 Botti G, Villedieu R. Lifting: résultats à long terme. Rev Chir Esthet Lang Fr 1997; 88: 21
  • 13 Botti G. Transpalpebral lift of the superior and median areas of the face. Face 1998; 5: 119
  • 14 Botti G. Lifting: dissezione e riposizionamento dello SMAS pre-parotideo. Riv Ital Chir Plast 1992; 24: 335
  • 15 Sterzi G. Il Tessuto Sottocutaneo. Officine grafiche Ferrari, Venezia; 1910
  • 16 Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58 (1) 80-88
  • 17 Skoog TG. Plastic Surgery: New Methods and Refinements. London: Saunders; 1974
  • 18 Bonnefon A. The face lift, a light, efficient and long lasting operation [in French]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2011; 56 (1) 80-88
  • 19 Becker FF, Bassichis BA. Deep-plane face-lift vs superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift: a comparative study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004; 6 (1) 8-13
  • 20 Warren RJ, Aston SJ, Mendelson BC. Face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (6) 747e-764e
  • 21 Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL, Baker TM. Extended SMAS dissection as an approach to midface rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 1995; 22 (2) 295-311
  • 22 Chang S, Pusic A, Rohrich RJ. A systematic review of comparison of efficacy and complication rates among face-lift techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (1) 423-433
  • 23 Pastorek N, Bustillo A. Deep plane face-lift. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2005; 13 (3) 433-449
  • 24 Narasimhan K, Stuzin JM, Rohrich RJ. Five-step neck lift: integrating anatomy with clinical practice to optimize results. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (2) 339-350
  • 25 Liu TS, Owsley JQ. Long-term results of face lift surgery: patient photographs compared with patient satisfaction ratings. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (1) 253-262
  • 26 Swanson E. Outcome analysis in 93 facial rejuvenation patients treated with a deep-plane face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (2) 823-834
  • 27 Baker D. Rhytidectomy with lateral SMASectomy. Facial Plast Surg 2000; 16 (3) 209-213
  • 28 Labbé D, Franco RG, Nicolas J. Platysma suspension and platysmaplasty during neck lift: Anatomical study and analysis of 30 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (6) 2001-2007
  • 29 Botti G, Pascali M, Botti C, Bodog F, Cervelli V. A clinical trial in facial fat grafting: filtered and washed versus centrifuged fat. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (6) 2464-2473
  • 30 Pascali M, Botti C, Cervelli V, Botti G. Midface rejuvenation: a critical evaluation of a 7-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (5) 1305-1316
  • 31 Botti G, Botti C. Midface lift: our current approaches. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2014; 46 (4) 224-233
  • 32 Tapia A, Mejina D, Rengifo M, Blanch A, Ferreira B. Improving the aesthetics of the cheek bone projection during facial lifting. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2000; 24 (2) 85-89
  • 33 Botti G, Pascali M, Botti C, Bodog F, Gentile P, Cervelli V. Comparison of commercial fibrin sealants in facelift surgery: a prospective study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2013; 6: 273-280
  • 34 Marchac D, Greensmith AL. Early postoperative efficacy of fibrin glue in face lifts: a prospective randomized trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (3) 911-916 , discussion 917–918
  • 35 Por Y-C, Shi L, Samuel M, Song C, Yeow VK-L. Use of tissue sealants in face-lifts: a metaanalysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009; 33 (3) 336-339
  • 36 Kamer FM, Nguyen DB. Experience with fibrin glue in rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (4) 1045-1051 , discussion 1052
  • 37 Marten TJ. High SMAS facelift: combined single flap lifting of the jawline, cheek, and midface. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (4) 569-603 , vi–vii
  • 38 Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (1) 53-61 , discussion 62–63
  • 39 Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (1) 1-13
  • 40 Kamer FM, Mingrone MD. Deep plane rhytidectomy: a personal evolution. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2005; 13 (1) 115-126
  • 41 Berry MG, Davies D. Platysma-SMAS plication facelift. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (5) 793-800
  • 42 Adamson PA, Dahiya R, Litner J. Midface effects of the deep-plane vs the superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007; 9 (1) 9-11