Skip to main content

2015 | Buch

Grounding Global Climate Change

Contributions from the Social and Cultural Sciences

herausgegeben von: Heike Greschke, Julia Tischler

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

This book traces the evolution of climate change research, which, long dominated by the natural sciences, now sees greater involvement with disciplines studying the socio-cultural implications of change. In their introduction, the editors chart the changing role of the social and cultural sciences, delineating three strands of research: socio-critical approaches which connect climate change to a call for cultural or systemic change; a mitigation and adaption strand which takes the physical reality of climate change as a starting point, and focuses on the concerns of climate change-affected communities and their participation in political action; and finally, culture-sensitive research which places emphasis on indigenous peoples, who contribute the least to the causes of climate change, who are affected most by its consequences, and who have the least leverage to influence a solution. Part I of the book explores interdisciplinarity, climate research and the role of the social sciences, including the concept of ecological novelty, an assessment of progress since the first Rio climate conference, and a 'global village' case study from Portugal. Part II surveys ethnographic perspectives in the search for social facts of global climate change, including climate and mobility in the West African Sahel, and human-non human interactions and climate change in the Canadian Subarctic. Part III shows how collaborative and comparative ethnographies can spin “global webs of local knowledge,” describing case studies of changing seasonality in Labrador and of rising water levels in the Chesapeake Bay. These perspectives are subjected to often-amusing, always incisive analysis in a concluding chapter entitled "You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet: a death-defying look at the future of the climate debate." The contributors engage critically with the research subject of ‘climate change’ itself, reflecting on their own practices of knowledge production and epistemological presuppositions. Finely detailed and sympathetic to a broad range of viewpoints, the book sets out a profile for the social sciences and humanities in the climate change field by systematically exploring methodological and theoretical challenges and approaches.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
Chapter 1. Introduction: Grounding Global Climate Change
Abstract
Global climate change research has seen an increasing involvement of the social sciences and humanities. The introduction charts the changing role of the social and cultural sciences in this field, delineating different research strands that have emerged over the past few years. Studies differ significantly according to the role assigned to the respective discipline, both within and beyond academia, as well as how they deal with the problem of uncertainty. While some studies are directly connected with a call for cultural or even system change, others take into account that people from different cultures conceptualise human-environmental relations in different ways. We move on to discuss several epistemological and methodological challenges arising out of the inherently interdisciplinary research subject of climate change and the attempt to reconcile locally-grounded approaches with global models. All of these problems are reflected in the different contributions of this volume, which are grouped into three parts. The first foregrounds questions of interdisciplinarity and the role of the social sciences in climate research, the second presents ethnographic case studies, while the third part provides insight into collaborative and comparative approaches.
Heike Greschke, Julia Tischler

Interdisciplinarity, Climate Research and the Role of the Social Sciences

Frontmatter
Chapter 2. Ecological Novelty: Towards an Interdisciplinary Understanding of Ecological Change in the Anthropocene
Abstract
This chapter presents a broad view of an ecological science in search of new paradigms for tackling the ecological challenges of the Anthropocene. In a first part, I introduce the concept of ‘ecological novelty’ to characterise ongoing environmental change. The environmental change that brings about ecological novelty can be characterised by at least six attributes: it is (1) man-made, (2) large, (3) very fast, (4) multi-dimensional, (5) variable, unknown and unpredictable and (6) of global extent and even affecting remote wilderness areas. In the second and third parts, I focus on two fundamental challenges that ecological novelty poses for ecological research: (i) distinguishing between nature and culture as separate realms of scientific investigation becomes obsolete; and (ii) understanding how ecological systems change requires embracing the complexities of ecosystems under real-world conditions (as opposed to controlled experimental settings) resulting from open system boundaries, contingencies and historicity. Ecology has long explored the transition zone between the natural and social sciences, and can significantly contribute to an interdisciplinary understanding of societal adaptation, whether to climate or more generally to environmental change.
Christoph Kueffer
Chapter 3. Predicting the Past? Integrating Vulnerability, Climate and Culture during Historical Famines
Abstract
Research on climate change is essentially a study of the past. However, while predicting future developments rests firmly on the analysis of historical changes, cooperation between climatologists and historians is extremely rare. Instead, the field is mired by disciplinary constraints and the resilient dichotomy of ‘natural’ and ‘cultural’ factors. Integrative approaches are only just beginning to emerge. Fewer still are empirical case studies that test the interaction of climate impacts and human responses in small-scale, high-resolution analyses. This paper tries to provide examples of both, drawing on the field of famine-studies. It presents the vulnerability-approach as an interdisciplinary boundary object for climate research, introducing the global famine of 1770–1772 as a case study. In this way, the paper makes the case for a genuinely historical approach in climate research to replace the current mode of simply ‘predicting the past.’
Dominik Collet
Chapter 4. Anthropology in the Anthropocene: Sustainable Development, Climate Change and Interdisciplinary Research
Abstract
Recent world summits on sustainable development or climate change have been considered as failures, with greenhouse emissions rising and sustainable development much talked about yet hardly seen. In this chapter, I argue that global environmental change programmes and their understanding of interdisciplinary research are part and parcel of this problem, having turned science into an “anti-politics machine” (Ferguson 1994). I illustrate this argument with sketches from two ethnographic case studies in Portugal and northern Germany, comparing them to the globalising approach of international research programmes. Rather than the ‘science is settled’ approach, I argue that the open dialogue about knowledge production and collaboration based on ethnographic research leads to a shift in perspective and helps to bring issues such as climate change into the world and science back into democracy.
Werner Krauss

Searching for the Social Facts of Global Climate Change: Ethnographic Perspectives

Frontmatter
Chapter 5. Climate and Mobility in the West African Sahel: Conceptualising the Local Dimensions of the Environment and Migration Nexus
Abstract
Despite the theoretical and methodological critique of deterministic and linear explanations of migration under changing climatic conditions, many empirical case studies in this field remain deeply entrenched in static push-pull frameworks and tend to reproduce simplistic causal relationships. Drawing on results from an interdisciplinary research project in Mali and Senegal, the chapter presents a methodological approach that emanates from past analytical shortcomings. By adopting a local perspective on migration, we consider cultural norms, the migration history and people’s interpretations of weather and environmental changes. Moreover, we argue for a multilevel, multi-method research that seeks to separate the two research topics of migration and climate/environment; for example, by avoiding explicit questions about possible linkages. Contrasting results from ethnographic fieldwork concerning migration, climate and environment with ‘hard’ data on climate and vegetation allows us to become more susceptible for the social construction of alleged ‘facts’ such as droughts and land degradation as drivers for migration. We place a focus upon local meanings of weather and environment by considering how they are being assessed by the people, within a context of not only climatic but rather multiple changes.
Clemens Romankiewicz, Martin Doevenspeck
Chapter 6. Animal Belongings: Human-Non Human Interactions and Climate Change in the Canadian Subarctic
Abstract
By ethnographically delineating a specific climate culture—a locally rooted framework for making sense of environmental changes—and weaving it into a broader historical and economic context, this chapter shows how the mainstream discourse on anthropogenic global climate change does not necessarily latch on to people’s everyday lives. Ethnographic field work in northern Manitoba, Canada, has revealed that while one particular local resource—polar bears—and its future reflect a popular element of accounts of warming temperatures worldwide, on-site it is interpreted in a profoundly different way. This leads to a setting with a distinct seasonality in terms of making climate change an issue or not. Taking this seasonal disparity as a point of entry, I show that the concept of anthropogenic climate change or rather its rejection enables a reinforcement of collective positioning and maintaining a particular social reality while at the same time, facing economic challenges, notions of warmer temperatures foster hope for a brighter future.
Claudia Grill

Spinning Global Webs of Local Knowledges: Collaborative and Comparative Ethnographies

Frontmatter
Chapter 7. The Social Facts of Climate Change: An Ethnographic Approach
Abstract
Climate change is considered to be global in at least two respects: it firstly denotes social-ecological processes affecting the whole world and secondly refers to a scientific body of knowledge claiming universal validity. Climate change, however, is not directly perceptible; knowledge about its causes and effects has to be mediated and can only become socially relevant at particular local sites if it connects to general life experiences and culture-specific patterns of interpreting the environment. Against this background, one might question the supposed global distribution and acceptance of climate change knowledge beyond academia. Drawing upon current experiences of the junior research group Climate Worlds, this chapter queries the prospects of climate change for becoming a globally shared issue of concern, paying particular attention to the role of social and cultural sciences in climate change research. It argues against an equation of physical and social facts of climate change and the disciplinary self-limitation to the study of mitigation and adaption strategies. In this regard, the parallels between the current shape of climate change-related social and cultural studies and the research tradition within the modernisation paradigm will be highlighted. The last part of the chapter finally explores the potentials of ethnography for developing a non-nostrifying approach to comparing distinct “climate cultures.” In respect thereof the notions of culture and belonging will be refined from a cross-linked ethnographic perspective.
Heike Greschke
Chapter 8. Comparing Climate Worlds: Theorising across Ethnographic Fields
Abstract
In this chapter, I discuss the issue of comparison as a road towards new climate knowledge. A point of departure is the notion of a knowledge space, as suggested by David Turnbull. When working with social responses to climate change, such knowledge spaces present themselves as apt analytical objects being both located and transcendent. This renders the unfolding of a particular kind of comparison possible, with special reference to exemplars, understood in Kuhn’s sense as shared examples of puzzle solutions, identified tacitly rather than explicitly. The idea is to demonstrate how ‘climate worlds’ can be seen as comparable spaces of particular puzzle solutions, allowing for new forms of theorising.
Kirsten Hastrup
Chapter 9. Towards Imagining the Big Picture and the Finer Details: Exploring Global Applications of a Local and Scientific Knowledge Exchange Methodology
Abstract
Local knowledge informs scientific and applied understandings (development, climate change adaptation, etc.) by showing the diversity of ways in which global phenomena are affecting local cultures and ecosystems. However, is there similar value for affected communities? Can global understandings inform local knowledge and, furthermore, can the two knowledge systems inform each other? If so, what could be a model of such knowledge exchange and is there a performative context to bring about such informing? This chapter argues yes, based on a series of successful knowledge exchanges conducted in northeastern Siberia in 2010. The chapter takes this process to the next step, to explore how a model for such knowledge exchanges could potentially be adapted to several different world contexts. The chapter begins with an overview of why such exchanges are important in our twenty-first century world and how the method was developed in the Siberian case. It then discusses relevant results, before moving to explore the ways in which the model could inform other world contexts, using cases from Labrador, Canada and Chesapeake Bay, Maryland.
Susan A. Crate

Concluding Statement

Frontmatter
Chapter 10. You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet: A Death-Defying Look at the Future of the Climate Debate
Abstract
The article looks at the ongoing debate on climate change against the background of established modes of environmental discourse. It argues that the climate discourse diverges notably from established lines of discussion in that it inspires an enthusiastic community of scientists, politicians and activists while offering no perspective for success. It uses Luhmannian systems theory to argue that the climate community shows symptoms of autopoiesis, resulting in a notable inability to communicate with the rest of society. It concludes with an agenda for the environmental humanities.
Frank Uekötter
Metadaten
Titel
Grounding Global Climate Change
herausgegeben von
Heike Greschke
Julia Tischler
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Electronic ISBN
978-94-017-9322-3
Print ISBN
978-94-017-9321-6
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9322-3