Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction: Grounding Global Climate Change Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. The Social Facts of Climate Change: An Ethnographic Approach

verfasst von : Heike Greschke

Erschienen in: Grounding Global Climate Change

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Climate change is considered to be global in at least two respects: it firstly denotes social-ecological processes affecting the whole world and secondly refers to a scientific body of knowledge claiming universal validity. Climate change, however, is not directly perceptible; knowledge about its causes and effects has to be mediated and can only become socially relevant at particular local sites if it connects to general life experiences and culture-specific patterns of interpreting the environment. Against this background, one might question the supposed global distribution and acceptance of climate change knowledge beyond academia. Drawing upon current experiences of the junior research group Climate Worlds, this chapter queries the prospects of climate change for becoming a globally shared issue of concern, paying particular attention to the role of social and cultural sciences in climate change research. It argues against an equation of physical and social facts of climate change and the disciplinary self-limitation to the study of mitigation and adaption strategies. In this regard, the parallels between the current shape of climate change-related social and cultural studies and the research tradition within the modernisation paradigm will be highlighted. The last part of the chapter finally explores the potentials of ethnography for developing a non-nostrifying approach to comparing distinct “climate cultures.” In respect thereof the notions of culture and belonging will be refined from a cross-linked ethnographic perspective.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Animal Belongings: Human-Non Human Interactions and Climate Change in the Canadian Subarctic
Nächstes Kapitel Comparing Climate Worlds: Theorising across Ethnographic Fields
Fußnoten
1
Climate Worlds is an initiative of the Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities (Essen) and the Bielefeld Graduate School in History and Sociology. It has been financially supported by the German Research Foundation. I owe a great personal debt of gratitude to these institutions and the projects’ directors Claus Leggewie and Jörg Bergmann for trusting me with the possibility of such inspiring collaborative work. My gratitude also goes to Tink Diaz for her wonderful documentary work and her overall support to the project’s progress; to the good soul of the project Johanna Gesing, to the project fellows Jelena Adeli, Claudia Grill, Robert Lindner, Julia Schleisiek and Lea Schmitt, whose detailed observations and intelligent thoughts are the centrepiece of this chapter, and to Julia Tischler for an extremely pleasant teamwork as well as for helpful suggestions on an earlier version of this chapter.
 
2
Many astronauts report about a radical change of perspective on the Earth and humans’ place on it due to the experience of having seen the planet in space with their own eyes (see Planetary Collective 2012).
 
3
Many thanks to Jelena Adeli for providing me with her field observations from Cape Verde, upon which the following notions are based.
 
4
The so-called “Thomas theorem” was first formulated by W.I. Thomas and D.S. Thomas in 1928 in the realm of childs’ behaviour studies. The authors point out that “the subject’s view of the situation, how he regards it, may be the most important element for interpretation. For his immediate behaviour is closely related to his definition of the situation, which may be in terms of objective reality or in terms of a subjective appreciation—‘as if’ it were so. […] If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences” (see p. 572 in Thomas and Thomas 1928).
 
5
I entirely agree with Kirsten Hastrup (Chap. 8, in this volume) that “native” is a highly problematic notion, because it adheres to the imagination of culture in terms of territorial bounded and homogeneous units, which are treated as being rather immutable, that is to say fixed in time and space (Abu-Lughod 1991). I suggest the ethnomethodological reading of the term “member” and its underlying notion of culture to be a more suitable tool for approaching the subjects in contemporary ethnographies. Put in Paul Ten Have’s words: “The notion of ‘member’ refers to capacities or competencies that people have as members of society; capacities to speak, to know, to understand, to act in ways that are sensible in that society and in the situations in which they find themselves” (see p. 17 in Ten Have 2002). This fits very well with ethnography’s interest in studying culture as an assemblage of practices, signs, things and values, and help to question clear-cut boundaries between we and others, including the ethnographer.
 
6
Since August 2012, all fellows are back from fieldwork and have been writing their individual PhD-thesis, apart from one (the San Francisco-study) who abandoned the project at an early stage due to a lack of funds.
 
7
The Climate Worlds methodology includes methods for analysing the process of becoming a member. This ethnomethodological principle is discussed and exemplified in Greschke (2012).
 
9
Due to offshore gas production near the island, the grounds in some parts of Ameland sink faster, which is appreciated by scientists to be treated as a natural simulation of the rising sea level.
 
Literatur
Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. G. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology (pp. 137–162). Santa Fe: School of American Research.
Cappai, G. (2010). Die unbewältigten Aufgaben der Kulturforschung. Ein handlungstheoretischer Aufriss. In G. Cappai, S. Shimada, & J. Straub (Eds.), Interpretative Sozialforschung und Kulturanalyse (pp. 11–35). Bielefeld: Transcript.
Coupland, N., & Ylänne-McEwen, V. (2000). Talk about the weather: Small talk, leisure talk and the travel industry. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk (pp. 163–182). Harlow et al.: Longman.
Demeritt, D. (2001). The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(2), 307–337.CrossRef
Eskjaer, M. F. (2009). Communicating climate change in regional news media. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 1(4), 356–367.CrossRef
Garfinkel, H., & Wieder, L. D. (1992). Two incommensurable asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context (pp. 175–206). London/New Delhi: Sage.
Gore, A. (1992). Earth in the balance: Ecology and the human spirit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Greschke, H. M. (2012). Is there a home in cyberspace? the internet in migrants’ everyday life and the emergence of global communities. New York/London: Routledge.
Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRef
Leggewie, C., & Welzer, H. (2009). Das Ende der Welt wie wir sie kannten. Klima, Zukunft und die Chancen der Demokratie. Frankfurt: Fischer.
Matthes, J. (1992). The operation called “Vergleichen”. In J. Matthes (Ed.), Zwischen den Kulturen? Die Sozialwissenschaften vor dem Problem des Kulturvergleichs (Soziale Welt Sonderband, Vol. 8, pp. 75–99). Göttingen: Schwartz.
Mecheril, P., & Hoffarth, B. (2004). Adoleszenz und Migration. Zur Bedeutung von Zugehörigkeitsordnungen. In V. King & H.-C. Koller (Eds.), Adoleszenz—Migration—Bildung. Bildungsprozesse Jugendlicher und junger Erwachsener mit Migrationshintergrund (pp. 221–240). Wiesbaden: VS.
Neverla, I., & Schäfer, M. S. (2010). Das Medienklima—Relevanz und Logik der Medienberichterstattung über den anthropogenen Klimawandel. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Meteorologischen Gesellschaft, 3, 9–12.
Neverla, I., & Schäfer, M. S. (Eds.). (2012). Das Medienklima. Fragen und Befunde der kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Klimaforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Niewöhner, J., & Scheffer, T. (2010). Thickening comparison: On the multiple facets of comparability. In T. Scheffer & J. Niewöhner (Eds.), Thick comparison. Reviving the ethnographic aspiration (pp. 1–15). Leiden: Brill.CrossRef
Radkau, J. (2011). Die Ära der Ökologie. Eine Weltgeschichte. München: Beck.
Schütz, A. (1967 [1953]). Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected papers I: The problem of social reality (pp. 3–47). The Hague: Nijhoff.
Stehr, N., & Storch, H. (1999). Über Klima, Wetter, Mensch. München: Beck.
Strauss, S., & Orlove, B. (2003). Up in the air: The anthropology of weather and climate. In S. Strauss & B. Orlove (Eds.), Weather, climate, culture (pp. 3–14). Oxford: Berg.
Szerszynski, B., & Urry, J. (2010). Changing climates: Introduction. Theory, Culture and Society, 27(2–3), 1–8.CrossRef
Taylor, P. J., & Buttel, F. H. (2005). How do we know we have global environmental problems. Science and the globalization of environmental discourse. In N. Haenn & R. R. Wilk (Eds.), The environment in anthropology—A reader in ecology, culture, and sustainable living (pp. 407–417). New York/London: New York University Press.
Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behaviour problems and programs. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Urry, J. (2011). Climate change & society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Metadaten
Titel
The Social Facts of Climate Change: An Ethnographic Approach
verfasst von
Heike Greschke
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Buch
Grounding Global Climate Change

Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9321-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-94-017-9322-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9322-3_7