Skip to main content

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

7. A Cumulative Belief Degree Approach for Prioritization of Energy Sources: Case of Turkey

verfasst von : Özgür Kabak, Didem Cinar, Gulcin Yucel Hoge

Erschienen in: Assessment and Simulation Tools for Sustainable Energy Systems

Verlag: Springer London

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Energy planning is difficult to model owing to its complex structure, with numerous decision makers, criteria, and scenarios. Fortunately, decision-making methods can be helpful for the sustainable development of energy, by the evaluation of different energy sources with regard to multiple aspects, for example, economic, environmental, political etc. In this study, a methodology based on a cumulative belief degree approach is proposed for the prioritization of energy sources. The approach enables the use of all types of evaluations, without the loss of any information. It also allows for incomplete expert evaluations which may occur in the energy sources prioritization problem. Turkey, like many countries, generates most of energy from fossil fuels, which are imported mostly from other countries. However, the enormous increase in oil prices, and an emerging energy demand, owing to economic growth and environmental issues, is forcing Turkey to improve its sustainable energy planning. Therefore, the proposed methodology is applied to the energy sources prioritization of Turkey. Results show that solar power and wind should be considered as the priori sources of energy in Turkey.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adamantiades A, Kessides I (2009) Nuclear power for sustainable development: current status and future prospects. Energy Policy 37(12):5149–5166CrossRef Adamantiades A, Kessides I (2009) Nuclear power for sustainable development: current status and future prospects. Energy Policy 37(12):5149–5166CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Amer M, Daim TU (2011) Selection of renewable energy technologies for a developing county: a case of Pakistan. Energ Sustainable Dev 15(4):420–435CrossRef Amer M, Daim TU (2011) Selection of renewable energy technologies for a developing county: a case of Pakistan. Energ Sustainable Dev 15(4):420–435CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Atmaca E, Basar HB (2012) Evaluation of power plants in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP). Energy 44(1):555–563CrossRef Atmaca E, Basar HB (2012) Evaluation of power plants in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP). Energy 44(1):555–563CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baris K, Kucukali S (2012) Availability of renewable energy sources in Turkey: current situation, potential, government policies and the EU perspective. Energ Policy 42:377–391CrossRef Baris K, Kucukali S (2012) Availability of renewable energy sources in Turkey: current situation, potential, government policies and the EU perspective. Energ Policy 42:377–391CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cristóbal JRS (2011) Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the Vikor method. Renew Energ 36(2):498–502CrossRef Cristóbal JRS (2011) Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the Vikor method. Renew Energ 36(2):498–502CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Doukas H, Karakosta C, Psarras J (2010) Computing with words to assess the sustainability of renewable energy options. Expert Syst Appl 37(7):5491–5497CrossRef Doukas H, Karakosta C, Psarras J (2010) Computing with words to assess the sustainability of renewable energy options. Expert Syst Appl 37(7):5491–5497CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jing YY, Bai H, Wang JJ (2012) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for CCHP systems driven by different energy sources. Energ Policy 42:286–296CrossRef Jing YY, Bai H, Wang JJ (2012) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for CCHP systems driven by different energy sources. Energ Policy 42:286–296CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jovanović M, Afgan N, Radovanović P, Stevanović V (2009) Sustainable development of the Belgrade energy system. Energy 34(5):532–539CrossRef Jovanović M, Afgan N, Radovanović P, Stevanović V (2009) Sustainable development of the Belgrade energy system. Energy 34(5):532–539CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kabak O, Ruan D (2011a) A cumulative belief degree-based approach for missing values in nuclear safeguards evaluation. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Energ 23(10):1441–1454CrossRef Kabak O, Ruan D (2011a) A cumulative belief degree-based approach for missing values in nuclear safeguards evaluation. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Energ 23(10):1441–1454CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kabak O, Ruan D (2011b) A comparison study of fuzzy MADM methods in nuclear safeguards evaluation. J Global Optim 51(2):209–226MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Kabak O, Ruan D (2011b) A comparison study of fuzzy MADM methods in nuclear safeguards evaluation. J Global Optim 51(2):209–226MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahraman C, Kaya I (2010) A fuzzy multi criteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Syst Appl 37(9):6270–6281CrossRef Kahraman C, Kaya I (2010) A fuzzy multi criteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Syst Appl 37(9):6270–6281CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahraman C, Kaya I, Cebi S (2009) A comparative analysis for multi-attribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Energy 34(10):1603–1616CrossRef Kahraman C, Kaya I, Cebi S (2009) A comparative analysis for multi-attribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Energy 34(10):1603–1616CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaya T, Kahraman C (2010) Multi criteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR and AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy 35(6):2517–2527MathSciNetCrossRef Kaya T, Kahraman C (2010) Multi criteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR and AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy 35(6):2517–2527MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) Multi criteria decision-making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):6577–6585CrossRef Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) Multi criteria decision-making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):6577–6585CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kowalski K, Stagl S, Madlener R, Omann I (2009) Sustainable energy futures: methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. Eur J Oper Res 197(9):1063–1074CrossRef Kowalski K, Stagl S, Madlener R, Omann I (2009) Sustainable energy futures: methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. Eur J Oper Res 197(9):1063–1074CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Laes E (2006) Nuclear energy and sustainable development. Ph.D. thesis. Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Laes E (2006) Nuclear energy and sustainable development. Ph.D. thesis. Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Zurück zum Zitat Phdungsilp A (2010) Integrated energy and carbon modeling with a decision support system: policy scenarios for low-carbon city development in Bangkok. Energ Policy 38(9):4808–4817CrossRef Phdungsilp A (2010) Integrated energy and carbon modeling with a decision support system: policy scenarios for low-carbon city development in Bangkok. Energ Policy 38(9):4808–4817CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning: a review. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 8(4):365–381CrossRef Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning: a review. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 8(4):365–381CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ren H, Gao W, Zhou W, Nakagami K (2009) Multi-criteria evaluation for the optimal adoption of distributed residential energy systems in Japan. Energ Policy 37(12):5484–5493CrossRef Ren H, Gao W, Zhou W, Nakagami K (2009) Multi-criteria evaluation for the optimal adoption of distributed residential energy systems in Japan. Energ Policy 37(12):5484–5493CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ruan D, Lu J, Laes E, Zhang G, Ma J, Meskens G et al (2010) Multi-criteria group decision support with linguistic variables in long-term scenarios for Belgian energy policy. J Univ Comput Sci 15(1):103–120 Ruan D, Lu J, Laes E, Zhang G, Ma J, Meskens G et al (2010) Multi-criteria group decision support with linguistic variables in long-term scenarios for Belgian energy policy. J Univ Comput Sci 15(1):103–120
Zurück zum Zitat Ruan D, Kabak O, Quinones R (2013) An ordered weighted averaging operator-based cumulative belief degree approach for energy policy evaluation. Int J Adv Oper Manage 5(1):58–73 Ruan D, Kabak O, Quinones R (2013) An ordered weighted averaging operator-based cumulative belief degree approach for energy policy evaluation. Int J Adv Oper Manage 5(1):58–73
Zurück zum Zitat Talinli I, Topuz E, Akbay MU (2010) Comparative analysis for energy production processes (EPPs): sustainable energy futures for Turkey. Energ Policy 38(8):4479–4488CrossRef Talinli I, Topuz E, Akbay MU (2010) Comparative analysis for energy production processes (EPPs): sustainable energy futures for Turkey. Energ Policy 38(8):4479–4488CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Topcu Y, Ulengin F (2004) Energy for the future: an integrated decision aid for the case of Turkey. Energy 29(1):137–154CrossRef Topcu Y, Ulengin F (2004) Energy for the future: an integrated decision aid for the case of Turkey. Energy 29(1):137–154CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tsoutsos T, Drandaki M, Frantzeskaki N et al (2009) Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete. Energ Policy 37(5): 1587–1600 Tsoutsos T, Drandaki M, Frantzeskaki N et al (2009) Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete. Energ Policy 37(5): 1587–1600
Zurück zum Zitat Wang JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF et al (2009) Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(9):2263–2278CrossRef Wang JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF et al (2009) Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(9):2263–2278CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang B, Kocaoglu DF, Daim TU et al (2010) A decision model for energy resource selection in China. Energ Policy 38(11):7130–7141CrossRef Wang B, Kocaoglu DF, Daim TU et al (2010) A decision model for energy resource selection in China. Energ Policy 38(11):7130–7141CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yang JB (2001) Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under uncertainties. Eur J Oper Res 131:31–61MATHCrossRef Yang JB (2001) Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under uncertainties. Eur J Oper Res 131:31–61MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yang JB, Sen P (1994) A general multi-level evaluation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern 24(10):1458–1473CrossRef Yang JB, Sen P (1994) A general multi-level evaluation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern 24(10):1458–1473CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yang JB, Singh MG (1994) An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern 24(1):1–18CrossRef Yang JB, Singh MG (1994) An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern 24(1):1–18CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning, Parts I, II, III. information sciences 8(1): 199–249, 8(2):301–357, 9(1): 42–80 Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning, Parts I, II, III. information sciences 8(1): 199–249, 8(2):301–357, 9(1): 42–80
Metadaten
Titel
A Cumulative Belief Degree Approach for Prioritization of Energy Sources: Case of Turkey
verfasst von
Özgür Kabak
Didem Cinar
Gulcin Yucel Hoge
Copyright-Jahr
2013
Verlag
Springer London
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5143-2_7