Introduction
Literature review
Electronic products and the environment
Environmental assessment of electronic products
Critical success factors (CSFs)
Indicators of sustainability
Benchmarking
Proposed benchmarking of sustainability method
Proposed critical success factors (CSFs)
Group | Critical success factors (CSFs) | Occurrences in the publications |
---|---|---|
Environmental impact | Environmental impact due to improper disposal | 2 |
Hazardous waste | 2 | |
Recovery prediction | 3 | |
Regulation | Government regulation | 3 |
Regulation and standards for recovery | 1 | |
Incentives by the government for recovery | 1 | |
Identification | Life of the product | 1 |
Variability of materials in the product | 1 | |
Identification of components | 3 | |
Identification of the manufacturer | 1 | |
Identification of materials | 3 | |
Identification by make and model | 5 | |
Identification of the quantity of components | 1 | |
Identification of value, time, and quantity | 2 | |
Recovery | Weight of recovered material per product | 2 |
Quantity of recoverable material per product | 2 | |
Time to recover the product | 2 | |
Cost to recover the product | 2 | |
Destruction of part of the product in order to be recovered | 2 | |
Variability of the components | 2 | |
Variability of dimension of the recovered product | 1 | |
Quantity of fixturing elements | 1 | |
Composition of the recovered product | 1 | |
Availability of products to be recovered | 2 | |
Knowledge of the recycling coefficient of the product | 2 | |
Information about the recovered product | 1 | |
Tracking the product life cycle | 1 | |
Information that help product recovery | 1 | |
Prediction of product recovery by a portion of the market | 1 | |
Relation between the product that enters the market and recovered product | 1 |
Indicators
Steps to obtain and evaluate the indicators
CSF | Questions | Variables susceptible to measurement | Objective | Justification | Element | Factor | Measure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Environmental impact due to improper disposal | After the use phase, what is the correct destination of the product? | Proper destination of the product after the use phase | Knowing the correct destination of the product after the use phase | Helps achieve the objectives of shared responsibility established by the National Solid Waste Policy | Correct destination | Proper destination of the product after the use phase | Proper destination of the product after the use phase (List) |
Hazardous waste | Is there hazardous waste? | Presence of hazardous waste | Check if the product contains hazardous waste to human health or the environment | Check the presence of hazardous waste, quantify and identify seeking the safety of the environment, the employees involved in production, customers, and those involved in recycling/reconditioning processes, in order to minimize risks | Hazardous waste | Hazardous waste in the product | Presence or not of hazardous waste in the product (Binary) |
During the recycling/reconditioning process can hazardous waste be safely separated? | Possibility of safely separating hazardous waste | Check if it is possible to separate the hazardous waste | It is justified by OHSAS 18001 (Occupational Safety and Health) | Separation of hazardous waste safely | Possibility or not to separate hazardous waste safely (Binary) | ||
Quantity of recoverable material per product | The company has program/partnership for recycling/recovery of its products? | Existence of program/partnership for recycling/recovery of products | Identify if the company has some project that helps processes and post-use of the product | By means of design studies for reuse/recycling the efficiency of post-use processes can be increased | Program | Existence of a program/partnership for recycling/recovery of products | Existence or not of a program/partnership for recycling/recovery of products (Binary) |
Are there studies aiming at designing products to favour recycling? | Existence of studies aiming at designing products that favour recycling | Design products | Existence of studies aiming at designing products that favour recycling | Existence or not of studies aiming at designing products that favour recycling (Binary) | |||
Regulation by the government | The environmental policy of the company is known by all employees? | The environmental policy of the company is known by all employees | Check if the environmental management system is spread across the company | The certification became reference over the environmental responsibility of the company, besides becoming a means to disseminate the image, reduce costs, and increase sales | Environmental policy | The environmental policy of the company is known by all employee | The environmental policy of the company is or is not known by all employees (Binary) |
Identification of materials | The company knows the life cycle of the identified materials? | Existence of information about the life cycle of the identified materials in the product | Check if the company has information on the life cycle of the materials | The company has studies of Life Cycle Assessment of the materials that compose the product | Identified materials | Existence of information about the life cycle of the identified materials in the product | Existence or not of information about the life cycle of the identified materials in the product (Binary) |
Questionnaire for benchmarking
-
Score 1—corresponds to a basic level of practice or performance (20%);
-
Score 3—corresponds to an intermediate level of practice or performance (60%);
-
Score 5—equals excellence in practice or performance (100%).
-
Scores 2 (40%) and 4 (80%)—refer to intermediate evaluation values of the item.
Results and discussion
Products | Number of employees |
---|---|
Printed circuit boards | 900 |
Printed circuit boards | 170 |
CPUs | 4100 |
Televisions | 2800 |
Microwave ovens | 1200 |
Smartphones | 2300 |
Computer Monitors | 700 |
CD players | 1500 |
Conventional telephones | 740 |
Method to apply the benchmarking questionnaire in the companies
Analysis of the results
Analysis of the chart of practices and performance
Analysis based on the radar chart
E1 (%) | E2 (%) | E3 (%) | E4 (%) | E5 (%) | E6 (%) | E7 (%) | E8 (%) | E9 (%) | Average (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Environmental Impact PR % | 60 | 60 | 55 | 55 | 90 | 65 | 65 | 60 | 55 | 63 |
Environmental Impact PF % | 40 | 40 | 47 | 47 | 57 | 53 | 53 | 47 | 53 | 49 |
Recovery PR % | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 22 |
Recovery PF % | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 30 | 40 | 40 | 39 |
Regulation PR % | 100 | 100 | 87 | 87 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 87 | 96 |
Regulation PF % | 60 | 60 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 64 |
Identification PR % | 100 | 100 | 60 | 20 | 100 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 56 |
Indentification PF % | 20 | 20 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 22 |
Analysis based on the bar chart
Factor | Code | Indicator |
---|---|---|
Environmental Impact | IA01 | Possibility of occurring environmental impact due to the improper disposal of the product |
IA02 | Possibility of redesigning the product to reduce the level of environmental impact | |
IA03 | Correct destination of the product after the use phase | |
IA04 | Existence of information on the packaging or product label on the correct destination after the use phase | |
IA05 | Existence of a program aimed at reducing environmental impact | |
IA06 | Presence of hazardous waste | |
IA07 | Quantity of dangerous waste | |
IA08 | List of hazardous waste | |
IA09 | Existence of training for the employee to handle hazardous materials | |
IA10 | Possibility of separating safely the hazardous waste | |
Recovery | RE01 | Existence of program/partnership for recovery/recycling products |
RE02 | Existence of studies for designing products that favour recycling | |
RE03 | Weight of recoverable material per product | |
RE04 | Percentage of material recoverable per product | |
Regulation | RG01 | There is regulation by the government |
RG02 | Presence of governmental incentives | |
RG03 | The company has the ISO 14000 standard certification | |
RG04 | The environmental policy of the company is known by everyone | |
RG05 | Environmental certifications in the process of being obtained | |
Identification | ID01 | Quantity of material identified per product |
ID02 | Existence of information about the life cycle of the materials identified in the product | |
ID03 | Inform the customer the list with the main materials that compose the product |
Factor | Type | Indicator | Company | Average (%) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 (%) | E2 (%) | E3 (%) | E4 (%) | E5 (%) | E6 (%) | E7 (%) | E8 (%) | E9 (%) | ||||
Environmental impact | PR | IA02 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 20 | 100 | 60 | 20 | 60 | 20 | 40 |
IA03 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 60 | 100 | 80 | 60 | 60 | 80 | 78 | ||
IA05 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 27 | ||
IA08 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
PF | IA01 | 20 | 20 | 60 | 60 | 20 | 40 | 60 | 60 | 40 | 42 | |
IA04 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 24 | ||
IA06 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | ||
IA07 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 60 | 60 | 100 | 20 | 60 | 42 | ||
IA09 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
IA10 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 80 | 69 |
Factor | Type | Indicator | Company | Average (%) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 (%) | E2 (%) | E3 (%) | E4 (%) | E5 (%) | E6 (%) | E7 (%) | E8 (%) | E9 (%) | ||||
Recovery | PR | RE01 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 22 |
RE02 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 22 | ||
PF | RE03 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 22 | |
RE04 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 40 | 60 | 40 | 60 | 60 | 56 |
Factor | Type | Indicator | Company | Average (%) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 (%) | E2 (%) | E3 (%) | E4 (%) | E5 (%) | E6 (%) | E7 (%) | E8 (%) | E9 (%) | ||||
Regulation | PR | RG01 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
RG02 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
RG03 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 87 | ||
PF | RG04 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 91 | |
RG05 | 20 | 20 | 100 | 100 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 38 |
Factor | Type | Indicator | Company | Average (%) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 (%) | E2 (%) | E3 (%) | E4 (%) | E5 (%) | E6 (%) | E7 (%) | E8 (%) | E9 (%) | ||||
Identification | PR | ID02 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 20 | 100 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 56 |
PF | ID01 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
ID03 | 20 | 20 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 24 |
Response from the participant companies
-
IA02 (Possibility of redesigning the product to reduce the level of environmental impact), and RE02 (Existence of studies for designing products that favour recycling): These were the indicators that companies show more resistance in developing actions, since the difficulty lies in not having the autonomy to start projects like these. Most of the participant companies are branches of large companies located in the industrial pole, which have their research centres in other places. In this context, Li et al. (2016) point out that product redesign adopting green manufacturing concepts such as disassembly contribute to: (a) making recycling cost effective, and (b) improving green supply chain capabilities, which seeks to reduce material, waste, energy and emissions.
-
IA05 (Existence of program to reduce environmental impact), and RE01 (Existence of program/partnership for recovery/recycling products): At least five of the participant companies intend to have programs that meet these indicators. Two companies reported having a reverse logistics program to return the products they manufactured, but when checking the company’s website, this information was not available;
-
IA04 (Existence of information on the packaging or product label on the correct disposal after the use phase): Some of the participant companies point out that they do not have this information about packaging, but information about the reverse logistics program will soon be available on the companies’ website. Reverse logistics is important in the context of green supply chain management (Govindan et al. 2015; Hsu et al. 2016).
-
IA06 (Presence of hazardous waste): All the participating companies report using the least harmful materials available on the market;
-
RE03 (Weight of recoverable material per product), ID01 (Quantity of material identified per product), and ID03 (Existence of information on the life cycle of materials identified in the product): These are indicators that most companies have shown to have no plan for short-term action, and they argue that this information can be estimated, but do not have it. With regard to indicator ID03, the participant companies reported that they do not have this information. However, during the discussion of the results at least three companies point out that they have the information, but it is not consolidated.