nach oben

Journal of Polymer Research

Erschienen in:

01.08.2023 | Original Paper

Electrospun nanocomposite membranes for wastewater treatment: γ-alumina nanoparticle incorporated polyvinyl chloride/thermoplastic polyurethane/polycarbonate membranes

verfasst von: Javad Yekrang, Habib Etemadi

Erschienen in: Journal of Polymer Research | Ausgabe 8/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this study, the nanocomposite membranes were electrospun using conventional polymers, including polyvinyl chloride (PVC), thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and polycarbonate (PC) at different levels of incorporation of the γ-alumina nanoparticles (1, 3 and 5 wt.%). Morphological investigation using SEM images showed that the diameters of the nanofibers were in the range of 155-491 nm. The energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis and FTIR test revealed the presence of the γ-alumina nanoparticles (NPs) and characteristic chemical groups in electrospun nanocomposite membranes (ENCMs). The contact angle test showed that the hydrophilic features of the membranes improved with the incorporation of γ-alumina NPs with the decrease of contact angle from 80° to 27^°. Mechanical tests exhibited a drop in tensile strength and strain of the nanocomposite membranes by adding more γ-alumina NPs to the neat membrane. Filtration efficiency of ENCMs was evaluated using the submerged system with the humic acid (HA) solution. Results showed that the permeation flux of the membranes increased with an increase in the content of the γ-alumina NPs (from 49 to 102 L.m^-2.h^-1). The irreversible fouling ratio (IFR) of the membranes was also improved by increase in the content of the γ-alumina NPs up to 3 wt.%. Results also demonstrated the better anti-fouling performance for the blended nanofiber membrane with 3 wt.% of the nanoparticles (flux recovery ratio, FRR=94.4 %). HA rejection test also proved the enhanced foulant removal (99.6 %) of ENCM containing 3 wt.% γ-alumina NPs.

Vorheriger Artikel Physicochemical properties of magnetically enhanced shape memory polymer composites doped with NiMnGa

Nächster Artikel Preparation and application of terbutylazine-simetryn double templates molecularly imprinted polymers

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Tramblay Y, Koutroulis A, Samaniego L et al (2020) Challenges for drought assessment in the Mediterranean region under future climate scenarios. Earth Sci Rev 210:103348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103348CrossRef

Sconiers WB, Rowland DL, Eubanks MD (2020) Pulsed drought: the effects of varying water stress on plant physiology and predicting herbivore response. Crop Sci 60:2543–2561. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20235CrossRef

Tortajada C (2020) Contributions of recycled wastewater to clean water and sanitation Sustainable Development Goals. npj Clean Water 3:22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-020-0069-3CrossRef

Drechsel P, Qadir M, Baumann J (2022) Water reuse to free up freshwater for higher-value use and increase climate resilience and water productivity. Irrig Drain 71:100–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2694CrossRef

Ariaeenejad S, Motamedi E, Hosseini Salekdeh G (2021) Application of the immobilized enzyme on magnetic graphene oxide nano-carrier as a versatile bi-functional tool for efficient removal of dye from water. Bioresour Technol 319:124228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124228CrossRefPubMed

Yu S, Tang H, Zhang D, Wang S, Gang MQ, Song D, Fu, Baowei Hu XW (2021) MXenes as emerging nanomaterials in water purification and environmental remediation. Sci Total Environ 811:152280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152280CrossRefPubMed

Saffari R, Shariatinia Z, Jourshabani M (2020) Synthesis and photocatalytic degradation activities of phosphorus containing ZnO microparticles under visible light irradiation for water treatment applications. Environ Pollut 259:113902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113902CrossRefPubMed

Worch E (2021) Adsorption Technology in Water Treatment. De Gruyter, DresdenCrossRef

Cui H, Huang X, Yu Z et al (2020) Application progress of enhanced coagulation in water treatment. RSC Adv 10:20231–20244. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra02979cCrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

10.

Pompa-Monroy DA, Iglesias AL, Dastager SG et al (2022) Comparative study of polycaprolactone electrospun fibers and casting films enriched with carbon and nitrogen sources and their potential use in water bioremediation. Membr (Basel) 12:327. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030327CrossRef

11.

Işık C, Saraç N, Teke M, Uğur A (2021) A new bioremediation method for removal of wastewater containing oils with high oleic acid composition:Acinetobacter haemolyticuslipase immobilized on eggshell membrane with improved stabilities. New J Chem 45:1984–1992. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nj05175fCrossRef

12.

Dehghani Y, Honarvar B, Azdarpour A, Nabipour M (2021) Treatment of wastewater by a combined technique of adsorption, electrocoagulation followed by membrane separation. Adv Environ Technol 7:171–183. https://doi.org/10.22104/AET.2021.5133.1394CrossRef

13.

Oliveira GA, Machado ÊL, Knoll RS et al (2022) Combined system for wastewater treatment: ozonization and coagulation via tannin-based agent for harvesting microalgae by dissolved air flotation. Environ Technol (United Kingdom) 43:1370–1380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2020.1830181CrossRef

14.

Ezugbe EO, Rathilal S (2020) Membrane technologies in wastewater treatment: a review. Membr (Basel) 10:89. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10050089CrossRef

15.

Reddy VS, Tian Y, Zhang C et al (2021) A review on electrospun nanofibers based advanced applications: from health care to energy devices. Polym (Basel) 13:3746. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213746CrossRef

16.

HMTShirazi R, Mohammadi T, Asadi AA, Tofighy MA (2022) Electrospun nanofiber affinity membranes for water treatment applications: a review. J Water Process Eng 47:102795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102795CrossRef

17.

Pervez MN, Mishu MR, Talukder ME et al (2022) Electrospun nanofiber membranes for the control of micro/nanoplastics in the environment. Water Emerg Contam Nanoplastics 1:10. https://doi.org/10.20517/wecn.2022.05CrossRef

18.

Su Y, Fan T, Cui W et al (2022) Advanced electrospun nanofibrous materials for efficient oil/water separation. Adv Fiber Mater 4:938–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-022-00158-3CrossRef

19.

Hartati S, Zulfi A, Maulida PYD et al (2022) Synthesis of electrospun PAN/TiO₂/Ag nanofibers membrane as potential air filtration media with photocatalytic activity. ACS Omega 7:10516–10525. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c00015CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

20.

Li N, Wang W, Zhu L et al (2021) A novel electro-cleanable PAN-ZnO nanofiber membrane with superior water flux and electrocatalytic properties for organic pollutant degradation. Chem Eng J 421:127857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127857CrossRef

21.

Roche R, Yalcinkaya F (2019) Electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous membranes for point-of-use water and air cleaning. ChemistryOpen 8:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/open.201800267CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

22.

Baby T, Jose TE, John CTA, Thomas R (2021) A facile approach for the preparation of polycarbonate nanofiber mat with filtration capability. Polym Bull 78:3363–3381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-020-03266-5CrossRef

23.

Alarifi IM, Alharbi AR, Khan MN et al (2018) Water treatment using electrospun PVC / PVP nanofibers as filter medium. J Mater Sci Res 2:43–49. https://doi.org/10.18689/ijmsr-1000107CrossRef

24.

Khan WS, Khan NU, Janjua MM (2019) Wastewater treatment with PVC electrospun nanofibrous membrane. In: 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET). IEEE, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

25.

Ghiasvand S, Rahmani A, Samadi M et al (2021) Application of polystyrene nanofibers filled with sawdust as separator pads for separation of oil spills. Process Saf Environ Prot 146:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.08.044CrossRef

26.

Sundaran SP, Reshmi CR, Sujith A (2018) Tailored design of polyurethane based fouling-tolerant nanofibrous membrane for water treatment. New J Chem 42:1958–1972. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nj03997bCrossRef

27.

Jiříček T, Komárek M, Lederer T (2017) Polyurethane nanofiber membranes for waste water treatment by membrane distillation. J Nanotechnol 2017:7143055. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7143035CrossRef

28.

Hu X, Chen X, Giagnorio M et al (2022) Beaded electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes for membrane distillation (MD). J Memb Sci 661:120850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120850CrossRef

29.

Nie Y, Zhang S, He Y et al (2022) One-step modification of electrospun PVDF nanofiber membranes for effective separation of oil–water emulsion. New J Chem 46:4734–4745. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1nj05436hCrossRef

30.

Pervez MN, Talukder ME, Mishu MR et al (2022) One-step fabrication of novel polyethersulfone-based composite electrospun nanofiber membranes for food industry wastewater treatment. Membr (Basel) 12:413. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040413CrossRef

31.

Nazemidashtarjandi S, Mousavi SA, Bastani D (2017) Preparation and characterization of polycarbonate/thermoplastic polyurethane blend membranes for wastewater filtration. J Water Process Eng 16:170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JWPE.2017.01.004CrossRef

32.

Quoc Pham L, Uspenskaya MV, Olekhnovich RO, Olvera Bernal RA (2021) A review on electrospun PVC nanofibers: fabrication, properties, and application. Fibers 9:12. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib9020012CrossRef

33.

Yekrang J, Mohseni L, Etemadi H (2023) Water treatment using PVC/TPU/PC electrospun nanofiber membranes. Fibers Polym 24:907–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-023-00100-3CrossRef

34.

Ahmad T, Guria C (2022) Progress in the modification of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membranes: a performance review for wastewater treatment. J Water Process Eng 45:102466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102466CrossRef

35.

Yong M, Zhang Y, Sun S, Liu W (2019) Properties of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) ultrafiltration membrane improved by lignin: hydrophilicity and anti-fouling. J Memb Sci 575:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2019.01.005CrossRef

36.

Behboudi A, Jafarzadeh Y, Yegani R (2017) Polyvinyl chloride/polycarbonate blend ultrafiltration membranes for water treatment. J Memb Sci 534:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.011CrossRef

37.

Julien TCM, Subramanyam MD, Katakam HC et al (2019) Ultrasoft polycarbonate polyurethane nanofibers made by electrospinning: fabrication and characterization. Polym Eng Sci 59:838–845. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.25021CrossRef

38.

Chen R, Zhang H, Wang M et al (2021) Thermoplastic polyurethane nanofiber membrane based air filters for efficient removal of ultrafine particulate matter PM_0.1. ACS Appl Nano Mater 4:182–189. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c02484CrossRef

39.

Liang W, Xu Y, Li X et al (2019) Transparent polyurethane nanofiber air filter for high-efficiency PM_2.5 capture. Nanoscale Res Lett 14:361. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-019-3199-0CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

40.

Chen H, Huang M, Liu Y et al (2020) Functionalized electrospun nanofiber membranes for water treatment: a review. Sci Total Environ 739:139944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139944CrossRefPubMed

41.

Akther N, Phuntsho S, Chen Y et al (2019) Recent advances in nanomaterial-modified polyamide thin-film composite membranes for forward osmosis processes. J Memb Sci 584:20–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.064CrossRef

42.

Huh JY, Lee J, Bukhari SZA et al (2020) Development of TiO₂-coated YSZ/silica nanofiber membranes with excellent photocatalytic degradation ability for water purification. Sci Rep 10:17811. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74637-1CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

43.

Marinho BA, de Souza SMAGU, de Souza AAU, Hotza D (2021) Electrospun TiO₂ nanofibers for water and wastewater treatment: a review. J Mater Sci 56:5428–5448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05610-6CrossRef

44.

Sun H, Feng J, Song Y et al (2022) Preparation of the carbonized zif – 8@PAN nanofiber membrane for cadmium ion adsorption. Polym (Basel) 14:2523. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132523CrossRef

45.

Zhang M, Ma W, Cui J et al (2020) Hydrothermal synthesized UV-resistance and transparent coating composited superoloephilic electrospun membrane for high efficiency oily wastewater treatment. J Hazard Mater 383:121152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121152CrossRefPubMed

46.

Talukder ME, Pervez MN, Jianming W et al (2022) Ag nanoparticles immobilized sulfonated polyethersulfone/polyethersulfone electrospun nanofiber membrane for the removal of heavy metals. Sci Rep 12:5814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09802-9CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

47.

Jang W, Yun J, Park Y et al (2020) Polyacrylonitrile nanofiber membrane modified with ag/go composite for water purification system. Polym (Basel) 12:2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12112441CrossRef

48.

Deepa K, Arthanareeswaran G (2022) Influence of various shapes of alumina nanoparticle in integrated polysulfone membrane for separation of lignin from woody biomass and salt rejection. Environ Res 209:112820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112820CrossRefPubMed

49.

Targol Hashemi M, Reza Mehrnia SG (2022) Influence of alumina nanoparticles on the performance of polyacrylonitrile membranes in MBR. J Environ Heal Sci Eng 20:375–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00784-wCrossRef

50.

Etemadi H, Afsharkia S, Zinatloo-Ajabshir S, Shokri E (2021) Effect of alumina nanoparticles on the anti-fouling properties of polycarbonate-polyurethane blend ultrafiltration membrane for water treatment. Polym Eng Sci 61:2364–2375. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.25764CrossRef

51.

Amusa AA, Ahmad AL, Adewole JK (2020) Mechanism and compatibility of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass and polymeric mixed matrix membranes: a review. Membr (Basel) 10:370–398. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10120370CrossRef

52.

Xu J, Tazawa N, Kumagai S et al (2018) Simultaneous recovery of high-purity copper and polyvinyl chloride from thin electric cables by plasticizer extraction and ball milling. RSC Adv 8:6893–6903. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra00301gCrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

53.

Idris A, Man Z, Maulud AS, Khan MS (2017) Effects of phase separation behavior on morphology and performance of polycarbonate membranes. Membr (Basel) 7:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes7020021CrossRef

54.

Gallu R, Méchin F, Dalmas F et al (2020) On the use of solubility parameters to investigate phase separation-morphology-mechanical behavior relationships of TPU. Polym (Guildf) 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122882

55.

Amin NAAM, Mokhter MA, Salamun N et al (2023) Anti-fouling electrospun organic and inorganic nanofiber membranes for wastewater treatment. South Afr J Chem Eng 44:302–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2023.02.002CrossRef

56.

Tang Y, Cai Z, Sun X et al (2022) Electrospun nanofiber-based membranes for water treatment. Polym 14:2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14102004CrossRef

57.

Hulsey S, Absar S, Choi H (2017) Comparative study of polymer dissolution techniques for electrospinning. Procedia Manuf 10:652–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.010CrossRef

58.

Fang B, Ning F, Hu S et al (2020) The effect of surfactants on hydrate particle agglomeration in liquid hydrocarbon continuous systems: a molecular dynamics simulation study. RSC Adv 10:31027–31038. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra04088fCrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

59.

Kang SP, Lee D, Lee JW (2020) Anti-agglomeration effects of biodegradable surfactants from natural sources on natural gas hydrate formation. Energies 13:1107. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13051107CrossRef

60.

Naullage PM, Bertolazzo AA, Molinero V (2019) How do surfactants control the agglomeration of clathrate hydrates? ACS Cent Sci 5:428–439. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.8b00755CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

61.

Mamun A, Sabantina L, Klöcker M et al (2022) Electrospinning nanofiber mats with magnetite nanoparticles using various needle-based techniques. Polym (Basel) 14:533. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14030533CrossRef

62.

Glaubitz C, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Lattuada M et al (2022) Designing the ultrasonic treatment of nanoparticle-dispersions via machine learning. Nanoscale 14:12940–12950. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2nr03240fCrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

63.

Pradhan S, Hedberg J, Blomberg E et al (2016) Effect of sonication on particle dispersion, administered dose and metal release of non-functionalized, non-inert metal nanoparticles. J Nanoparticle Res 18:285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3597-5CrossRef

64.

Karbowniczek JE, Ura DP, Stachewicz U (2022) Nanoparticles distribution and agglomeration analysis in electrospun fiber based composites for desired mechanical performance of poly(3-hydroxybuty-rate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate (PHBV) scaffolds with hydroxyapatite (HA) and titanium dioxide (TiO₂) towards me. Compos Part B Eng 241:110011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110011CrossRef

65.

Shojaeiarani J, Bajwa D, Holt G (2020) Sonication amplitude and processing time influence the cellulose nanocrystals morphology and dispersion. Nanocomposites 6:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/20550324.2019.1710974CrossRef

66.

Sandhya M, Ramasamy D, Sudhakar K et al (2021) Ultrasonication an intensifying tool for preparation of stable nanofluids and study the time influence on distinct properties of graphene nanofluids – A systematic overview. Ultrason Sonochem 73:105479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105479CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

67.

Sharifi A, Khorasani SN, Borhani S, Neisiany RE (2018) Alumina reinforced nanofibers used for exceeding improvement in mechanical properties of the laminated carbon/epoxy composite. Theor Appl Fract Mech 96:193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.05.001CrossRef

68.

Zdraveva E, Mijovic B, Govorcin Bajsic E, Grozdanic V (2018) The efficacy of electrospun polyurethane fibers with TiO₂ in a real time weathering condition. Text Res J 88:2445–2453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517517723025CrossRef

69.

Kumar R, Kumar M, Awasthi K (2016) Functionalized Pd-decorated and aligned MWCNTs in polycarbonate as a selective membrane for hydrogen separation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41:23057–23066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.008CrossRef

70.

Atrak K, Ramazani A, Taghavi S (2018) Green synthesis of amorphous and gamma aluminum oxide nanoparticles by tragacanth gel and comparison of their photocatalytic activity for the degradation of organic dyes. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 29:8347–8353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-8845-2CrossRef

71.

Zhu L, Sun C, Chen L et al (2017) Influences of NH₄F additive and calcination time on the morphological evolution of α-Al₂O₃ from a milled γ-Al₂O₃ precursor. Z für Naturforsch B 72:665–670CrossRef

72.

Gohari B, Abu-Zahra N (2018) Polyethersulfone membranes prepared with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane modified alumina nanoparticles for Cu(II) removal from water. ACS Omega 3:10154–10162. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b01024CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

73.

Etemadi H, Qazvini H (2021) Investigation of alumina nanoparticles role on the critical flux and performance of polyvinyl chloride membrane in a submerged membrane system for the removal of humic acid. Polym Bull 78:2645–2662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-020-03234-zCrossRef

74.

Elumalai P, Parthipan P, Huang M et al (2021) Enhanced biodegradation of hydrophobic organic pollutants by the bacterial consortium: impact of enzymes and biosurfactants. Environ Pollut 289:117956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117956CrossRefPubMed

75.

Ruan H, Li B, Ji J et al (2018) Preparation and characterization of an amphiphilic polyamide nanofiltration membrane with improved anti-fouling properties by two-step surface modification method. RSC Adv 8:13353–13363. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra00637gCrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

76.

Yuan XS, Liu W, Zhu WY, Zhu XX (2020) Enhancement in flux and anti-fouling properties of polyvinylidene fluoride/polycarbonate blend membranes for water environmental improvement. ACS Omega 5:30201–30209. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04656CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

77.

Malczewska B, Lochyński P, Charazińska S et al (2023) Electrospun silica-polyacrylonitrile nanohybrids for water treatments. Membr (Basel) 13:72. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13010072CrossRef

78.

Wang Y, Górecki RP, Stamate E et al (2019) Preparation of super-hydrophilic polyphenylsulfone nanofiber membranes for water treatment. RSC Adv 9:278–286. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA06493HCrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

79.

Shakiba M, Nabavi SR, Emadi H, Faraji M (2021) Development of a superhydrophilic nanofiber membrane for oil/water emulsion separation via modification of polyacrylonitrile/polyaniline composite. Polym Adv Technol 32:1301–1316. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.5178CrossRef

80.

Yalcinkaya F, Siekierka A, Bryjak M (2017) Preparation of fouling-resistant nanofibrous composite membranes for separation of oily wastewater. Polym (Basel) 9:679. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9120679CrossRef

81.

Li YJ, Chen GE, Xie HY et al (2022) Increasing the hydrophilicity and anti-fouling properties of polyvinylidene fluoride membranes by doping novel nano-hybrid ZnO@ZIF-8 nanoparticles for 4-nitrophenol degradation. Polym Test 113:107613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107613CrossRef

82.

Moradi G, Zinadini S (2020) A high flux graphene oxide nanoparticles embedded in PAN nanofiber microfiltration membrane for water treatment applications with improved anti-fouling performance. Iran Polym J (English Ed 29:827–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-020-00842-4CrossRef

83.

Sahu A, Dosi R, Kwiatkowski C et al (2023) Advanced polymeric nanocomposite membranes for water and wastewater treatment: a comprehensive review. Polym (Basel) 15:540. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030540CrossRef

84.

Ashraf MA, Peng W, Zare Y, Rhee KY (2018) Effects of size and aggregation/agglomeration of nanoparticles on the interfacial/interphase properties and tensile strength of polymer nanocomposites. Nanoscale Res Lett 13:214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-018-2624-0CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

85.

Charlton AJ, Lian B, Blandin G et al (2020) Impact of FO operating pressure and membrane tensile strength on draw-channel geometry and resulting hydrodynamics. Membr (Basel) 10:111. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10050111CrossRef

86.

Anoar Ali Khan SB (2021) Membrane-based hybrid processes for wastewater treatment. Elsevier

87.

Pal P (2020) Membrane-based technologies for environmental pollution control. Membr Technol Environ Pollut Control 1–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-00072-9

88.

Nayak SK, Dutta K, Gohil JM (2022) Advancement in polymer-based membranes for water remediation

89.

Liu F, Wang L, Li D et al (2019) A review: the effect of the microporous support during interfacial polymerization on the morphology and performances of a thin film composite membrane for liquid purification. RSC Adv 9:35417–35428. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra07114hCrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

90.

Peng J, Su Y, Shi Q et al (2011) Protein fouling resistant membrane prepared by amphiphilic pegylated polyethersulfone. Bioresour Technol 102:2289–2295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.045CrossRefPubMed

91.

Peldszus S, Hallé C, Peiris RH et al (2011) Reversible and irreversible low-pressure membrane foulants in drinking water treatment: identification by principal component analysis of fluorescence EEM and mitigation by biofiltration pretreatment. Water Res 45:5161–5170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.07.022CrossRefPubMed

92.

Vatanpour V, Madaeni SS, Moradian R et al (2012) Novel antibifouling nanofiltration polyethersulfone membrane fabricated from embedding TiO₂ coated multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Sep Purif Technol 90:69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.02.014CrossRef

93.

Mahmodi G, Ronte A, Dangwal S et al (2022) Improving anti-fouling property of alumina microfiltration membranes by using atomic layer deposition technique for produced water treatment. Desalination 523:115400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115400CrossRef

94.

Breite D, Went M, Prager A, Schulze A (2016) The critical zeta potential of polymer membranes: how electrolytes impact membrane fouling. RSC Adv 6:98180–98189. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra19239dCrossRef

95.

Ghezelgheshlaghi S, Mehrnia MR, Homayoonfal M, Montazer-Rahmati MM (2018) Al₂O₃/poly acrylonitrile nanocomposite membrane: from engineering design of pores to efficient biological macromolecules separation. J Porous Mater 25:1161–1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-017-0527-6CrossRef

96.

Plisko TV, Bildyukevich AV, Burts KS et al (2020) Modification of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes via addition of anionic polyelectrolyte based on acrylamide and sodium acrylate to the coagulation bath to improve anti-fouling performance in water treatment. Membr (Basel) 10:264. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10100264CrossRef

97.

Teow YH, Ooi BS, Ahmad AL (2017) Study on PVDF-TiO₂ mixed-matrix membrane behaviour towards humic acid adsorption. J Water Process Eng 15:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.04.005CrossRef

98.

Arif Z, Sethy NK, Kumari L et al (2019) Anti-fouling behaviour of PVDF/TiO₂ composite membrane: a quantitative and qualitative assessment. Iran Polym J (English Ed 28:301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-019-00700-yCrossRef

99.

Etemadi H, Fonouni M, Yegani R (2020) Investigation of anti-fouling properties of polypropylene/TiO₂ nanocomposite membrane under different aeration rate in membrane bioreactor system. Biotechnol Rep 25:e00414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00414CrossRef

100.

Rabiee H, Farahani MHDA, Vatanpour V (2014) Preparation and characterization of emulsion poly(vinyl chloride) (EPVC)/TiO2 nanocomposite ultrafiltration membrane. J Memb Sci 472:185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.08.051CrossRef

Titel: Electrospun nanocomposite membranes for wastewater treatment: γ-alumina nanoparticle incorporated polyvinyl chloride/thermoplastic polyurethane/polycarbonate membranes
verfasst von: Javad Yekrang
Habib Etemadi
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2023
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Polymer Research / Ausgabe 8/2023
Print ISSN: 1022-9760
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8935
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-023-03672-z

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2023

Computational modelling of the separation of molten polymer blends by a centrifugal technique

Study on the fatigue resistance of natural rubber with SiO2 microspheres

Epoxidation modification of strictly alternating copolymer via living and controlled anionic alternating copolymerization of 1,3-pentadiene and styrene derivatives

Correction to: Improving the mechanical, thermal and electrical properties of polyurethane- graphene oxide nanocomposites synthesized by in-situ polymerization of ester-based polyol with hexamethylene diisocyanate

Diblock copolymers poly(3-hexylthiophene)-block-poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate-random-1-pyrenylmethyl methacrylate), controlled synthesis and optical properties

Stretchable and lightweight MWCNTs/TPU composites films with excellent electromagnetic interference shielding and dynamic mechanical properties

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten