nach oben

Electronic Commerce Research

Erschienen in:

05.11.2022

Investigation on users’ resistance intention to facial recognition payment: a perspective of privacy

verfasst von: Xusen Cheng, Liyang Qiao, Bo Yang, Xiaoping Zhang

Erschienen in: Electronic Commerce Research | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Despite the convenience of facial recognition payment (FRP), many consumers hesitate to use FRP. Drawing on the antecedent-privacy concern-outcome (APCO) macro model, this study investigates antecedents of privacy concerns and privacy fatigue in the context of FRP and how privacy concerns and privacy fatigue influence user’s resistance intention of FRP. A mixed-methods is used to address these issues. A semi-structured interview is first used to identify the antecedents of privacy concerns and privacy fatigue for facial privacy information. According to the research results, we develop research hypotheses and build the research model. By analyzing survey data from 394 respondents using Amos, this study finds that privacy experience, privacy control, privacy policy effectiveness, peer influence, and reputation significantly influence users’ privacy concerns for facial privacy information; in addition, privacy experience, privacy control, and negative media exposure significantly influence users’ privacy fatigue. Moreover, privacy concerns and privacy fatigue are significantly related to users’ resistance intention to FRP.

Vorheriger Artikel Kickstarting blockchain: designing blockchain-based tokens for equity crowdfunding

Nächster Artikel Barriers to blockchain adoption for supply chain finance: the case of Indian SMEs

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

BBC News. 2019. China facial recognition: Law professor sues wildlife park.https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50324342.

Xinhua News Agency. 2020. Who’s selling our facial information?http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2020-07/13/c_1126232239.htm.

Consumer News & Business Channel (CNBC). 2019. San Francisco bans police use of face recognition technology.https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/15/san-francisco-bans-police-use-of-face-recognition-technology.html.

Zhong, Y., Oh, S., & Moon, H. C. (2021). Service transformation under industry 4.0: Investigating acceptance of facial recognition payment through an extended technology acceptance model. Technology in Society, 64, 101515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101515CrossRef

Liu, Y. L., Yan, W., & Hu, B. (2021). Resistance to facial recognition payment in China: the influence of privacy-related factors. Telecommunications Policy, 45(5), 102115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102155CrossRef

Iimedia (2019). Facial payment research report in China. https://www.iimedia.cn/c400/66866.html

Allen, K. (2019). China facial recognition: Law professor sues wildlife park.BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50324342

Maity, S., Abdel-Mottaleb, M., & Asfour, S. S. (2020). Multimodal biometrics recognition from facial video with missing modalities using deep learning. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 16(1), 6–29. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.02.0129CrossRef

Dibeklioglu, H., Alnajar, F., Salah, A. A., & Gevers, T. (2015). Combining facial dynamics with appearance for age estimation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 24(6), 1928–1943. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2015.2412377CrossRef

Dantcheva, A., & Br´emond, F. (2016). Gender estimation based on smile-dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 12(3), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2016.2632070CrossRef

Zhang, W. K., & Kang, M. J. (2019). Factors affecting the use of facial-recognition payment: An example of Chinese consumers. Ieee Access : Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 7, 154360–154374. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2927705CrossRef

Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information privacy: measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 167–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/249477CrossRef

10.

Choi, H., Park, J., & Jung, Y. (2018). The role of privacy fatigue in online privacy behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 81(APR.), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.001

11.

Cheng, X., Hou, T., & Mou, J. (2021). Investigating perceived risks and benefits of information privacy disclosure in it-enabled ride-sharing. Information & Management, (2), 103450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103450

12.

Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011). Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 989–1016. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409970CrossRef

13.

Li, L., Lee, K. Y., Chang, Y., Yang, S. B., & Park, P. (2021). IT-enabled sustainable development in electric scooter sharing platforms: focusing on the privacy concerns for traceable information. Information Technology for Development, (2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1882366

14.

Dinev, T., Bellotto, M., Hart, P., Russo, V., Serra, I., & Colautti, C. (2006). Privacy calculus model in e-commerce – a study of Italy and the United States. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(4), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000590CrossRef

15.

Zhu, M., et al. (2021). Privacy paradox in mHealth applications: an integrated elaboration likelihood model incorporating privacy calculus and privacy fatigue. Telematics and Informatics, 61, 101601CrossRef

16.

Hargittai, E., & Marwick, A. (2016). “What can I really do?“: explaining the privacy paradox with online apathy. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3737–3757

17.

Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 21–54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43825936CrossRef

18.

Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., &Sullivan, Y. W., et al. (2016). Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: an extension and illustration. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 17(7), 435–495. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00433CrossRef

19.

Galton, F. (1889). Head growth in students at the University of Cambridge. Nature, 40, 318. https://doi.org/10.1038/040318a0CrossRef

20.

Galton, F. (1910). Numeralised profiles for classification and recognition. Nature, 83, 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1038/083127a0CrossRef

21.

Morosan, C. (2020). Hotel facial recognition systems: insight into guests’ system perceptions, congruity with selfimage, and anticipated emotions. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 21(1), 21–38

22.

Gao, J., Rong, Y., Tian, X., & Yao, Y. O. (2020). Save time or save face? the stage fright effect in the adoption of facial recognition payment technology. Social Science Electronic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3668036CrossRef

23.

Moriuchi, E. (2021). An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use biometric facial recognition as a payment method. Psychology & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21495CrossRef

24.

Ciftci, O., Choi, E., & Berezina, K. (2021). Let’s face it: are customers ready for facial recognition technology at quick-service restaurants? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 95(2), 102941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102941CrossRef

25.

Xu, Z., Zhang, T., Zeng, Y., Wan, & Wu, W. (2015). March). A secure mobile payment framework based on face authentication. The International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists

26.

Belanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011). Privacy in the digital age: a review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35, 1017–1041. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409971CrossRef

27.

Bansal, G., & Zahedi, F. M. (2015). Trust violation and repair: the information privacy perspective. Decision Support Systems, 71(mar.), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.009CrossRef

28.

Miltgen, C. L., & Smith, H. J. (2015). Exploring information privacy regulation, risks, trust, and behavior. Information & Management, 52(6), 741–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.06.006CrossRef

29.

Ursin, G., Malila, N., Chang-Claude, J., Gunter, M., & Knudsen, G. (2019). Sharing data safely while preserving privacy. The Lancet, 394(10212), 1902. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32603-0

30.

Agozie, D. Q., & Kaya, T. (2021). Discerning the effect of privacy information transparency on privacy fatigue in e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 1, 101601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101601CrossRef

31.

James, T. L., Wallace, L., Warkentin, M., Kim, B. C., & Collignon, S. E. (2017). Exposing others’ information on online social networks (OSNS): perceived shared risk, its determinants, and its influence on OSN privacy control use. Information & Management, 54(7), 851–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.01.001CrossRef

32.

Yu, L., Li, H., He, W., Wang, F. K., & Jiao, S. (2019). A meta-analysis to explore privacy cognition and information disclosure of internet users. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 102015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.09.011CrossRef

33.

Cellary, W., & Rykowski, J. (2015). Challenges of smart industries – privacy and payment in visible versus unseen internet. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), S17-S23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.005

34.

Krishen, A. S., Raschke, R. L., Close, A. G., & Kachroo, P. (2017). A power-responsibility equilibrium framework for fairness: understanding consumers’ implicit privacy concerns for location-based services. Journal of Business Research, 73(APR.), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.002

35.

Xu, H., Teo, H. H., Tan, B., & Agarwal, R. (2009). The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), 135–174. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222260305CrossRef

36.

Son, J. Y., & Kim, S. S. (2008). Internet users’ information privacy-protective responses: a taxonomy and a nomological model. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 503–529CrossRef

37.

Ream, E., & Richardson, A. (1996). Fatigue: a concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 33(5), 519–529CrossRef

38.

D’Urso, S. C. (2010). Who’s watching us at work? toward a structural–perceptual model of electronic monitoring and surveillance in organizations. Communication Theory, 16(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00271.xCrossRef

39.

Sirkka, L. J., & Dorothy, E. L. (1999). Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2640242CrossRef

40.

Anthony, D. M., & Krishnamurthy, S. (2002). Internet Seals of Approval: Effects on Online Privacy Policies and Consumer Perceptions[J]. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36(1), 28–49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23860158CrossRef

41.

Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1086/209566CrossRef

42.

Dinev, T., Smith, H. J., McConnell, et al. (2015). Informing privacy research through information systems, psychology, and behavioral economics: thinking outside the “APCO” box. Information Systems Research, 26(4), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0600CrossRef

43.

Lankton, N. K., & Tripp, J. F. (2013). A Quantitative and Qualitative Study of Facebook Privacy using the Antecedent-Privacy Concern-Outcome Macro Model. AMCIS 2013 Proceedings

44.

Califf, C. B., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2020). The bright and dark sides of technostress: a mixed-methods study involving healthcare it. MIS Quarterly, 44(2), 809–856. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14818CrossRef

45.

Cui, T., Tong, Y., Teo, H. H., & Li, J. (2020). Managing knowledge distance: it-enabled inter-firm knowledge capabilities in collaborative innovation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(1), 217–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2019.1705504CrossRef

46.

Mingers, & John. (2001). Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 240–259. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011015CrossRef

47.

Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research Designs: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552003000100015CrossRef

48.

Plowman, D. A., Baker, L. T., Beck, T. E., Kulkarni, M., Solansky, S. T., & Travis, D. V. (2007). Radical change accidentally: the emergence and amplification of small change. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 515–543. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525647CrossRef

49.

Cheng, X., & Macaulay, L. (2014). Exploring individual trust factors in computer mediated group collaboration: a case study approach. Group Decision and Negotiation, 23(3), 533–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-013-9340-zCrossRef

50.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385CrossRef

51.

Wunderlich, P., Veit, D. J., & Sarker, S. (2019). Adoption of sustainable technologies: a mixed-methods study of german households. MIS Quarterly, 42(2), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/12112CrossRef

52.

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (2008). Basics Of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications

53.

Bansal, G., Zahedi, F., ‘., & Gefen, D. (2010). The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online. Decision Support Systems, 49(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.01.010CrossRef

54.

Yuan, L. (2014). The impact of disposition to privacy, website reputation and website familiarity on information privacy concerns. Decision Support Systems, 57, 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.09.018CrossRef

55.

Nathalie, B., Pattyn, A., et al. (2008). “Psychophysiological investigation of vigilance decrement: Boredom or cognitive fatigue?“. Physiology & Behavior, 93(1–2), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.09.016CrossRef

56.

Phelps, J., Nowak, G., & Ferrell, E. (2000). Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to provide personal information. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.19.1.27.16941CrossRef

57.

Anić, I. D., Škare, V.; Kursan Milaković, & Ivana (2019). The determinants and effects of online privacy concerns in the context of e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research & Applications, 36, 100868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100868

58.

Gardner, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625CrossRef

59.

Rubaltelli, E., Scrimin, S., Moscardino, U., Priolo, G., & Buodo, G. (2018). Media exposure to terrorism and people’s risk perception: the role of environmental sensitivity and psychophysiological response to stress. British Journal of Psychology, 109(4), 656–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12292CrossRef

60.

Gu, J., Xu, Y., Xu, H., Zhang, C., & Ling, H. (2016). Privacy concerns for mobile app download: an elaboration likelihood model perspective. Decision Support Systems, 94, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.10.002CrossRef

61.

Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 347(6221), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1465CrossRef

62.

Culnan, M. J. (1993). “How Did They Get My Name?“: An Exploratory Investigation of Consumer Attitudes toward Secondary Information Use. MIS Quarterly, 17(3), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.2307/249775CrossRef

63.

Culnan, M. J. (1995). Consumer awareness of name removal procedures: Implications for direct marketing. Journal of Direct Marketing, 9(2), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.4000090204CrossRef

64.

Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): the construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032CrossRef

65.

Phelps, J. E., D’Souza, G., & Nowak, G. J. (2001). Antecedents and consequences of consumer privacy concerns: an empirical investigation (p2-17). Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.1019CrossRef

66.

Xu, H., et al. (2012). Effects of Individual Self-Protection, Industry Self-Regulation, and Government Regulation on Privacy Concerns: A Study of Location-Based Services.Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1342–1363,1378,1382–1383. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42004260

67.

Du, S., Keil, M., Mathiassen, L., Shen, Y., & Tiwana, A. (2007). Attention-shaping tools, expertise, and perceived control in it project risk assessment. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.10.002CrossRef

68.

Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: an empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.104CrossRef

69.

Chang, Y., Wong, S. F., Libaque-Saenz, C. F., & Lee, H. (2018). The role of privacy policy on consumers’ perceived privacy. Government Information Quarterly, 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.002

70.

Liu, C., Marchewka, J. T., Lu, J., & Yu, C. S. (2005). Beyond concern—a privacy-trust-behavioral intention model of electronic commerce. Information & Management, 42(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.01.002CrossRef

71.

Huang, S. Y., Yen, D. C., & Irina Popova. (2012). The effect of online privacy policy on consumer privacy concern and trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 889–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.008CrossRef

72.

Balapour, A., Nikkhah, H. R., & Sabherwal, R. (2020). Mobile application security: Role of perceived privacy as the predictor of security perceptions. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 102063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102063CrossRef

73.

Tsai, J. Y., Egelman, S., Cranor, L., & Acquisti, A. (2007). The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: an experimental study. Information Systems Research, 22(2), 254–268. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23015560CrossRef

74.

Riahi-Belkaoui, A., & Pavlik, E. (1992). Accounting for Corporate Reputation. Westport, CT: Quorum Books

75.

Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: the role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001CrossRef

76.

Jøsang, A., Ismail, R., & Boyd, C. (2007). A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 618–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.019CrossRef

77.

Wermers, R. (1999). Mutual fund herding and the impact on stock prices. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 581–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00118CrossRef

78.

Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009). Peer Relationships in Adolescence. In L. Steinberg & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Adolescent Psychology

79.

Liang, H., & Shen, F. (2018). Birds of a schedule flock together: social networks, peer influence, and digital activity cycles. Computers in Human Behavior, 82(may), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.016CrossRef

80.

Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Wang, X., & Wan, X. (2016). Exploring factors of user’s peer-influence behavior in social media on purchase intention: evidence from qq. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 980–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.037CrossRef

81.

Hoadley, C. M., Xu, H., Lee, J. J., & Rosson, M. B. (2010). Privacy as information access and illusory control: the case of the Facebook news feed privacy outcry. Electronic Commerce Research & Applications, 9(1–6), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2009.05.001CrossRef

82.

Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, J., & Hart, P. (2011). Information privacy concerns: linking individual perceptions with institutional privacy assurances. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12), 798–824. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241111104893CrossRef

83.

Stone, E. F., Gueutal, H. G., Gardner, D. G., & Mcclure, S. (1983). A field experiment comparing information-privacy values, beliefs, and attitudes across several types of organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(3), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.3.459CrossRef

84.

Stewart, K. A., & Segars, A. H. (2002). An empirical examination of the concern for information privacy instrument. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 36–49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23015822CrossRef

85.

Okazaki, S., Eisend, M., Plangger, K., Ruyter, K. D., & Grewal, D. (2020). Understanding the strategic consequences of customer privacy concerns: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Retailing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.05.007CrossRef

86.

Bandara, R. J., Fernando, M., & Akter, S. (2021). Construing online consumers’ information privacy decisions: the impact of psychological distance. Information & Management, 58(7), 103497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103497CrossRef

87.

Choi, B., & Land, L. (2016). The effects of general privacy concerns and transactional privacy concerns on Facebook apps usage. Information & Management, 53(7), 868–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.02.003CrossRef

88.

Zhang, X., Liu, S., Chen, X., Wang, L., Gao, B., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Health information privacy concerns, antecedents, and information disclosure intention in online health communities. Information & Management, 55(4), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.11.003CrossRef

89.

Zoonen, L. V. (2016). Privacy concerns in smart cities. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.004CrossRef

90.

Hopstaken, J. F., Linden, D., Bakker, A. B., & Kompier, M. (2015). A multifaceted investigation of the link between mental fatigue and task disengagement. Psychophysiology, 52(3), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12339CrossRef

91.

Slyke, C., Shim, J. T., Johnson, R., & Jiang, J. (2006). Concern for information privacy and online consumer purchasing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(6), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00092CrossRef

92.

Ax, S., & Gregg, V. H.,D Jones (2001). Coping and illness cognitions: chronic fatigue syndrome. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00031-8CrossRef

93.

Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 124–140CrossRef

94.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.). UK: Wiley & Sons Ltd

95.

Mittelstaedt, R. A., et al. (1976). Optimal Stimulation Level and the Adoption Decision Process. Journal of Consumer Research, 3(2), 84–94. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2489114CrossRef

96.

Hair, J., Mathews, M. L., & Mathews, L. R. (2017). PLM-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107–123CrossRef

97.

Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6CrossRef

98.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press

99.

Saprikis, V., & Avlogiaris, G. (2021). Modeling users’ acceptance of mobile social commerce: the case of ‘Instagram checkout’. Electronic Commerce Research, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09499-4

100.

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill

101.

Davidshofer, K. R., & Murphy, C. O. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications. New Jersey: Pearson/Prentice-Upper Saddle River

102.

Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2013). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson New International: Pearson Education Limited

103.

Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: a comment. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 375–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150979CrossRef

104.

Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Communication of the Association for Information System, 4(7), 1–77. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407CrossRef

105.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312CrossRef

106.

Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press

107.

Li, Y. (2011). Empirical studies on online information privacy concerns: Literature review and an integrative framework. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28(28), 453–496

108.

Benamati, J. H., Ozdemir, Z. D., & Smith, H. J. (2017). An empirical test of an Antecedents - Privacy Concerns -Outcomes model. Journal of Information Science, 43(5), 583–600CrossRef

109.

Ioannou, A., Tussyadiah, I., & Yang, L. (2020). Privacy concerns and disclosure of biometric and behavioral data for travel. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102122CrossRef

Titel: Investigation on users’ resistance intention to facial recognition payment: a perspective of privacy
verfasst von: Xusen Cheng
Liyang Qiao
Bo Yang
Xiaoping Zhang
Publikationsdatum: 05.11.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Electronic Commerce Research / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1389-5753
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9362
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09588-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Small businesses and FinTech: a systematic review and future directions

Are FinTech, Robotics, and Blockchain index funds providing diversification opportunities with emerging markets?Lessons from pre and postoutbreak of COVID-19

Fintech Growth during COVID-19 in MENA Region: Current Challenges and Future prospects

Securing blockchain-based crowdfunding platforms: an integrated graph neural networks and machine learning approach

What makes consumers trust and adopt fintech? An empirical investigation in China

Uncovering research trends and opportunities on FinTech: a scientometric analysis