nach oben

Journal of Business Ethics

Erschienen in:

13.10.2017 | Original Paper

Stakeholder Salience for Small Businesses: A Social Proximity Perspective

verfasst von: Merja Lähdesmäki, Marjo Siltaoja, Laura J. Spence

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper advances stakeholder salience theory from the viewpoint of small businesses. It is argued that the stakeholder salience process for small businesses is influenced by their local embeddedness, captured by the idea of social proximity, and characterised by multiple relationships that the owner-manager and stakeholders share beyond the business context. It is further stated that the ethics of care is a valuable ethical lens through which to understand social proximity in small businesses. The contribution of the study conceptualises how the perceived social proximity between local stakeholders and small business owner-managers influences managerial considerations of the legitimacy, power and urgency of stakeholders and their claims. Specifically, the paradoxical nature of close relationships in the salience process is acknowledged and discussed.

Vorheriger Artikel The Role of CSR in Crises: Integration of Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the Persuasion Knowledge Model

Nächster Artikel Profit-Driven Corporate Social Responsibility as a Bayesian Real Option in Green Computing

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

In this study, the concept of locality includes the idea of local community as the embodiment of a certain geographical closeness and social proximity in terms of feelings of belonging and similarity.

Addelson, K. P. (1991). Impure thoughts: Essays on philosophy, feminism, and ethics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs. An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–527.

Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114.CrossRef

Ayios, A., Jeurissen, R., Manning, P., & Spence, L. J. (2014). Social Capital: A review from an ethics perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review., 23(1), 108–124.CrossRef

Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.CrossRef

Baumann-Pauly, D., Wickert, C., Spence, L., & Scherer, A. (2013). Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: Size matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 693–705.CrossRef

Baumback, C. M. (1988). How to organize and operate a small business (8th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Besser, T. L., & Jarnagin, S. K. (2010). Corporate social responsibility. Small businesses and small towns. History of corporate social responsibility project. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Ethical Business Cultures located at the Opus College of Business, University of St.Thomas—Minnesota.

Besser, T. L., & Miller, N. (2001). Is the good corporation dead? The community social responsibility of small business operators. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(3), 221–241.CrossRef

Besser, T. L., & Miller, N. (2013). Social capital, local businesses, and amenities in U.S. rural prairie communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 186–195.CrossRef

Boissevain, J. (1974). Friends of friends: Networks, manipulators, and coalitions. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Borgerson, J. L. (2007). On the harmony of feminist ethics and business ethics. Business and Society Review, 112(4), 477–509.CrossRef

Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.CrossRef

Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2010). The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 120–135). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Brass, D. J., Butterfield, K. D., & Skaggs, B. C. (1998). Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 14–31.CrossRef

Cameron, J. E. (1999). Social identity and the pursuit of possible selves: Implications for the psychological well-being of university students. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(3), 179–189.CrossRef

Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1153–1173.CrossRef

Courrent, J.-M., & Gundolf, K. (2009). Proximity and micro-enterprise manager’s ethics: A French empirical study of responsible business attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 749–762.CrossRef

Cox, K. (1998). Locality and community: Some conceptual issues. European Planning Studies, 6(1), 17–30.CrossRef

Curran, J., & Blackburn, R. (1994). Small firms and local economic networks. The death of the local economy?. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.

Deaux, K. (1994). Social identity. In J. Worrell (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and gender (Vol. 2, pp. 1059–1067). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

DeMoss, M., & McCann, G. (1997). Without a care in the world: The business ethics course and its exclusion of a care perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 435–443.CrossRef

Desiraju, R., & Moorthy, S. (1997). Managing a distribution channel under asymmetric information with performance requirements. Management Sci., 43(12), 1628–1644.CrossRef

Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.CrossRef

Driscoll, C., & Starik, M. (2004). The Primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 55–73.CrossRef

Durkin, M., McGowan, P., & McKeown, N. (2013). Exploring social media adoption in small to medium-sized enterprises in Ireland. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(4), 716–734.CrossRef

Dyer, W. G., & Handler, W. (1994). Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19, 71.CrossRef

Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Fauchart, E., & Gruber, M. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935–957.CrossRef

Filion, L. J. (1990). Free trade: The need for a definition of small business. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 33–46.CrossRef

Frederiksen, C. S. (2010). The relation between policies concerning corporate social responsibility (CSR) and philosophical moral theories—An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 357–371.CrossRef

Fuller, T., & Tian, Y. (2006). Social and symbolic capital and responsible entrepreneurship: An empirical investigation of SME narratives. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 287–304.CrossRef

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Goss, D. (2005). Shumpeter’s legacy? Interaction and emotions in the sociology of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(2), 205–218.CrossRef

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRef

Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 25–56). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Grayson, K. (2007). Friendship versus business in marketing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 121–139.CrossRef

Haytko, D. L. (2004). Firm-to-firm and interpersonal relationships: Perspectives from advertising agency account managers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 312–328.CrossRef

Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hinds, P. J., & Mortensen, M. (2005). Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16(3), 290–307.CrossRef

Huber, F. (2012). On the role and interrelationship of spatial, social and cognitive proximity: Personal knowledge relationships of R&D workers in the Cambridge information technology cluster. Regional Studies, 46, 1169–1182.CrossRef

Jamali, D., Zanhour, M., & Keshishian, T. (2009). Peculiar strengths and relational attributes of SMEs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 355–377.CrossRef

Jenkins, H. (2004). A critique of conventional CSR theory: An SME perspective. Journal of General Management, 29(4), 37–57.CrossRef

Jenkins, H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 241–256.CrossRef

Johannisson, B., & Mönsted, M. (1997). Contextualising entrepreneurial networking—The case of Scandinavia. International Studies of Management and Organisations, 27(3), 109–136.CrossRef

Johannisson, B., Ramírez-Pasillas, M., & Karlsson, G. (2002). The institutional embeddedness of local inter-firm networks: a leverage for business creation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14(4), 297–315.CrossRef

Karasawa, M. (1991). Toward an assessment of social identity: The structure of identification and its effects on in-group evaluations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30(4), 293–307.CrossRef

Kitching, J. (1994). Employer’s work-force construction policies in the small service sector enterprise. In D. Storey & J. Atkinson (Eds.), Employment, the small firm, and the labour market (pp. 103–146). London: Routledge.

Kossinets, G., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science, 311(6), 88–90.CrossRef

Lähdesmäki, M., & Siltaoja, M. (2010). Towards variety of meanings—Multiple representations of reputation in small business context. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 207–222.CrossRef

Lähdesmäki, M., & Suutari, T. (2012). Keeping at arm’s length or searching for proximity? Corporate social responsibility as a reciprocal process between small businesses and the local community. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 481–493.CrossRef

Laplume, A., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. (2008). Stakeholder theory: A longitudinal review of a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 24(6), 1152–1189.CrossRef

Lepoutre, J., & Heene, A. (2006). Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 257–273.CrossRef

Liedtka, J. (1996). Feminist morality and competitive reality: A role for an ethics of care. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2), 179–200.CrossRef

Longenecker, J. G., Moore, C. W., Petty, J. W., Palich, L. E., & McKinney, J. A. (2006). Ethical attitudes in small businesses and large corporations: Theory and empirical findings from a tracking study spanning three decades. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 167–183.CrossRef

Magness, V. (2008). Who are the stakeholders now? An empirical examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood theory of stakeholder salience. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 177–192.CrossRef

McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.CrossRef

Mishina, Y., Dykes, B. J., Block, E. S., & Pollock, T. G. (2010). Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 701–722.CrossRef

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Christman, J. J., & Spence, L. J. (2011). Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 235–255.CrossRef

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.CrossRef

Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2000). A selective review of time assumptions in strategy research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 796–812.CrossRef

Murillo, D., & Lozano, J. M. (2006). SMEs and CSR: An approach to CSR in their own words. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 227–240.CrossRef

Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.CrossRef

Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Whitwell, G. J. (2011). Stakeholder salience revisited: Refining, redefining, and refueling an underdeveloped conceptual tool. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(3), 357–378.CrossRef

Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2009). Investigating CSR communication in SMEs: A case study among Danish middle managers. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), 83–93.CrossRef

Oerlemans, L., & Meeus, M. (2005). Do organization and spatial proximity impact firm performance? Regional Studies, 39(1), 89–104.CrossRef

Oinas, P. (1998). The embedded firm? Predule for a revived geography of enterprise. Acta Universitatis Oeconomicae Helsingiensis, A-143, Helsinki, Finland.

Parent, M. M., & Deephouse, D. L. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 1–23.CrossRef

Perrini, F., Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2007). CSR strategies of SMEs and large firms. Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 285–300.CrossRef

Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 25–41.CrossRef

Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in contemporary sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.CrossRef

Quayle, M. (2002). E-commerce: The challenge for UK SMEs in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(10), 1148–1161.CrossRef

Quinn, J. J. (1997). Personal ethics and business ethics: The ethical attitudes of owner/managers of small business. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2), 119–127.CrossRef

Rao, H., Davis, G. F., & Ward, A. (2000). Embeddedness, social identity and mobility: Why firms leave the NASDAQ and join the New York Stock Exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 268–292.CrossRef

Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95–112.CrossRef

Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 91–115.CrossRef

Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties. A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.CrossRef

Rowley, T. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204–219.CrossRef

Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1974). The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university budget. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 453–473.CrossRef

Scheffler, S. (1997). Relationships and responsibilities. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26(3), 189–209.CrossRef

Schwartz, S. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 23–47.CrossRef

Sen, S., & Cowley, J. (2013). The relevance of stakeholder theory and social capital theory in the context of CSR in SMEs: An Australian perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 413–427.CrossRef

Siltaoja, M., & Lähdesmäki, M. (2015). From rationality to emotionally embedded elations: Envy as a signal of power in stakeholder relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(4), 837–850.CrossRef

Simpson, B., & Willer, R. (2008). Altruism and indirect reciprocity: The interaction of person and situation in prosocial behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 71(1), 37–52.CrossRef

Sorenson, O. (2003). Social networks and industrial geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13(5), 513–527.CrossRef

Spence, L. J. (2004). Forever friends? Friendship, dynamic relationships and small firm social responsibility. London: Brunel University, Brunel Research in Enterprise, Innovation, Sustainability and Ethics.

Spence, L. J. (2014). Business ethics and social responsibility in small firms. In E. Chell & M. Karatas-Özkan (Eds.), Handbook of research on small business and entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Spence, L. J. (2016). Small business social responsibility: Redrawing core CSR theory. Business and Society, 55(1), 23–55.CrossRef

Spence, L. J., Coles, A.-M., & Harris, L. (2001). The forgotten stakeholder? Ethics and social responsibility in relation to competitors. Business and Society Review, 106(4), 331–352.CrossRef

Spence, L. J., & Rutherfoord, R. (2003). Small business and empirical perspectives in business ethics: Editorial. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 1–5.CrossRef

Spence, L. J., Schmidpeter, R., & Habisch, A. (2003). Assessing social capital: Small and medium sized enterprises in Germany and the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 17–29.CrossRef

Steier, L. P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2015). Governance challenges in family businesses and Business Families. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. doi:10.1111/etap.12180.CrossRef

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.CrossRef

Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Taifel (Ed.), Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 61–76). London: Academic Press.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Tashman, P., & Raelin, J. (2013). What and what really matters to the firm: Moving stakeholder salience beyond managerial perceptions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(4), 591–616.CrossRef

Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.

Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.CrossRef

Valcour, P. M. (2002). Managerial behavior in a multiplex role system. Human Relations, 55(10), 1153–1188.CrossRef

Verbrugge, L. M. (1979). Multiplexity in adult friendships. Social Forces, 57(4), 1286–1309.CrossRef

von Weltzien, H., & Melé, D. (2009). Can an SME become a global corporate citizen? Evidence from a case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 551–563.CrossRef

von Weltzien, H., & Shankar, D. (2011). How can SMEs in a cluster respond to global demands for corporate responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 101(2), 175–195.CrossRef

Wilson, J. M., O’Leary, M., Metiu, A., & Jett, Q. R. (2008). Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organization Studies, 29(7), 979–1002.CrossRef

Worthington, I., Ram, M., & Jones, T. (2006). Exploring corporate social responsibility in the U.K. Asian small business community. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 201–217.CrossRef

Zavyalova, A., Pfaffer, M., Reger, R. K., & Hubbard, T. (2016). Reputation as a benefit and a burden? How stakeholders' organizational identification affects the role of reputation following a negative event. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 253–276.CrossRef

Titel: Stakeholder Salience for Small Businesses: A Social Proximity Perspective
verfasst von: Merja Lähdesmäki
Marjo Siltaoja
Laura J. Spence
Publikationsdatum: 13.10.2017
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3707-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Disciplinary Actions by State Professional Licensing Boards: Are They Fair?

Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Disclosures: An Investigation of Investors’ and Analysts’ Perceptions

The Role of CSR in Crises: Integration of Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the Persuasion Knowledge Model

Local Social Environment, Firm Tax Policy, and Firm Characteristics

The Relationship Between Sarbanes–Oxley Policies and Donor Advisories in Nonprofit Organizations

Does State Community Benefits Regulation Influence Charity Care and Operational Efficiency in U.S. Non-profit Hospitals?

Premium Partner