Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Social Robotics
Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics 1/2014

01.01.2014

The Uncanny in the Wild. Analysis of Unscripted Human–Android Interaction in the Field

verfasst von: Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Nicole C. Krämer, Christian Becker-Asano, Kohei Ogawa, Shuichi Nishio, Hiroshi Ishiguro

Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Against the background of the uncanny valley hypothesis we investigated how people react towards an android robot in a natural environment dependent on the behavior displayed by the robot (still vs. moving) in a quasi-experimental observational field study. We present data on unscripted interactions between humans and the android robot “Geminoid HI-1” in an Austrian public café and subsequent interviews. Data were analyzed with regard to the participants’ nonverbal behavior (e.g. attention paid to the robot, proximity). We found that participants’ behavior towards the android robot as well as their interview answers were influenced by the behavior the robot displayed. In addition, we found huge inter-individual differences in the participants’ behavior. Implications for the uncanny valley and research on social human–robot interactions are discussed.
Vorheriger Artikel A Pilot Study with a Novel Setup for Collaborative Play of the Humanoid Robot KASPAR with Children with Autism
Nächster Artikel A Survey on Perception Methods for Human–Robot Interaction in Social Robots

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Onishi M, Luo Z, Odashima T et al (2007) Generation of human care behaviors by human–interactive robot RI-MAN. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, ICRA’07. IEEE Press, New York, pp 3128–3129
2.
3.
Matarić MJ (2006) Socially assistive robotics. IEEE Intell Syst 21(4):81–83
4.
5.
6.
Stafford RQ, MacDonald BA, Jayawardena C et al (2013) Does the robot have a mind? Mind perception and attitudes towards robots predict use of an eldercare robot. Int J Soc Robot. doi:10.​1007/​s12369-013-0186-y
7.
8.
Blow MP, Dautenhahn K, Appleby A et al (2006) Perception of robot smiles and dimensions for human–robot interaction design. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2006), pp 469–474
9.
Ishiguro H (2006) Interactive humanoids and androids as ideal interfaces for humans. In: Paris CL, Sidner CL, Edmonds E et al (eds) Proceedings of the 11th international conference on intelligent user interfaces, IUI ’06. ACM Press, New York, pp 2–9
10.
Mori M (1970) The uncanny valley. Energy 7(4):33–35
11.
12.
MacDorman KF (2006) Subjective ratings of robot video clips for human likeness, familarity, and eeriness: an exploration of the uncanny valley. In: Proceedings of the cog sci 2006 workshop on android science, pp 26–29
13.
Hanson D, Olney A, Pereira IA et al (2005) Upending the uncanny valley. In: Proceedings of the national conference on artificial intelligence, vol 20, pp 1728–1729
14.
Brenton M, Gillies M, Ballin D et al (2005) The uncanny valley: does it exist? In: Proceedings of the conference of human computer interaction, workshop on human animated character interaction
15.
Hanson D (2006) Exploring the aesthetic range for humanoid robots. In: Proceedings of the cog sci 2006 workshop on android science, pp 16–20
16.
Pollick FE (2010) In search of the uncanny valley. In: Daras P, Ibarra OM (eds) Proceedings of the first international conference on user centric media, UCMedia 2009, Venice, Italy, December 9–11, 2009. Revised selected papers. Springer, Berlin, pp 69–78
17.
Gee FC, Browne WN, Kawamura K (2005) Uncanny valley revisited. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE workshop ro-man, pp 151–157
18.
Bartneck C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H et al (2007) Is the uncanny valley an uncanny cliff? In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2007), pp 368–373
19.
Shimada M, Minato T, Itakura S et al (2006) Evaluation of android using unconscious recognition. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots (Humanoids 2006), pp 157–162. doi:10.​1109/​ICHR.​2006.​321378 CrossRef
20.
Minato T, Shimada M, Itakura S et al (2005) Does gaze reveal the human likeness of an android? In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on development and learning, pp 106–111
21.
22.
von der Pütten AM, Eimler SC, Krämer NC (2011) Living with a robot companion. empirical study on the interaction with an artificial health advisor. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM international conference on multimodal interaction, ICMI’11. ACM Press, New York, pp 327–334
23.
Sung J (2009) Robots in the wild: understanding long-term use. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, HRI’09. ACM Press, New York, pp 45–52
24.
25.
Weiss A, Igelsböck J, Tscheligi M et al (2010) Robots asking for directions: the willingness of passers-by to support robots. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, HRI 2010. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 23–30
26.
Hayashi K, Sakamoto D, Kanda T et al (2007) Humanoid robots as a passive-social medium. In: Breazeal CL, Schultz AC, Fong T et al (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, HRI’07. ACM, New York, pp 137–144 CrossRef
27.
Shiomi M, Kanda T, Ishiguro H et al (2007) Interactive humanoid robots for a science museum. Intell Syst 22(2):25–32 CrossRef
28.
29.
Bartneck C, Takayuki K, Ishiguro H et al (2009) My robotic doppelgänger—a critical look at the uncanny valley theory. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2009), pp 269–276
30.
31.
Hara F (2004) Artificial emotion of face robot through learning in communicative interactions with human. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, (RO-MAN 2004), pp 7–15. doi:10.​1109/​ROMAN.​2004.​1374712
32.
Walters ML, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R et al (2007) Exploring the design space of robot appearance and behavior in an attention-seeking ‘Living room’ scenario for a robot companion. In: IEEE symposium on artificial life (ALIFE ’07), pp 341–347. doi:10.​1109/​ALIFE.​2007.​367815 CrossRef
33.
34.
35.
36.
McDorman KF (2005) Mortality salience and the uncanny valley. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, pp 399–405
37.
Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S et al (1990) Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. J Pers Soc Psychol 58(2):308–318. doi:10.​1037/​0022-3514.​58.​2.​308 CrossRef
38.
Ho C, MacDorman KF, Pramono Z (2008) Human emotion and the uncanny valley: a GLM, MDS, and isomap analysis of robot video ratings. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI 2008), pp 169–176
39.
Noma M, Saiwaki N, Itakura S et al (2006) Composition and evaluation of the humanlike motions of an android. In: 6th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, pp 163–168
40.
41.
42.
Straub I, Nishio S, Ishiguro H (2010) Incorporated identity in interaction with a teleoperated android robot: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2010), pp 119–144. doi:10.​1109/​ROMAN.​2010.​5598695
43.
Nass C, Steuer J, Tauber ER (1994) Computers are social actors. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference of human factors in computing systems (CHI 1994), pp 72–78
44.
Nass C, Moon Y, Morkes J et al (1997) Computers are social actors: a review of current research. In: Friedman B (ed) Human values and the design of computer technology, vol 72. CSLI Publications, Cambridge, pp 137–162
45.
Ramey CH (2006) An inventory of reported characteristics for home computers, robots, and human beings: applications for android science and the uncanny valley. In: MacDorman KF, Ishiguro H (eds) Proceedings of the ICCS/CogSci-2006 long symposium “Toward social mechanisms of android science”, pp 21–25
46.
Becker-Asano C, Ogawa K, Nishio S et al (2010) Exploring the uncanny valley with geminoid HI-1 in a real world application. In: Blashki K (ed) Proceedings of the IADIS international conference on interfaces and human computer interaction, IHCI 2010, pp 121–128
47.
Ortony A, Norman D, Revelle W (2005) Affect and proto-affect in effective functioning. In: Fellous J, Arbib MA (eds) Who needs emotions: the brain meets the robot. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 173–202 CrossRef
48.
Cowley JS, McDorman KF (2006) What baboons, babies, and Tetris players tell us about interaction: a biosocial view of norm-based social learning. Connect Sci 18(4):363–378 CrossRef
49.
Minsky M (1975) A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston PH (ed) The psychology of computer vision. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 211–277
50.
Ramey CH (2005) The uncanny valley of similarities concerning abortion, baldness, heaps of sand, and humanlike robots. In: Proceedings of views of the uncanny valley workshop: IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, Tsukuba, Japan, pp 8–13
51.
Rozin P, Fallon AE (1987) A perspective on disgust. Psychol Rev 94(1):23–41 CrossRef
52.
Rozin P, Haidt J, McCauley C et al (1999) Individual differences in disgust sensitivity: comparisons and evaluations of paper-and-pencil versus behavioral measures. J Res Pers 33(3):330–351 CrossRef
53.
Blow MP, Dautenhahn K, Appleby A et al (2006) The art of designing robot faces—dimensions for human–robot interaction. In: Goodrich MA, Schultz AC, Bruemmer DJ (eds) Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI/SIGART 2nd conference on human robot interaction (HRI2006). ACM, New York, pp 321–332
54.
Nass C, Fogg BJ, Moon Y (1996) Can computers be teammates? Int J Hum-Comput Stud 45:669–678 CrossRef
55.
von der Pütten AM, Krämer NC (2012) A survey on robot appearances. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI 2012), pp 267–268
56.
Nishio S, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Geminoid: teleoperated android of an existing person. In: de Pina Filho AC (ed) Humanoid Robots: New Developments. I-Tech Education and Publishing, Rijeka, pp 343–352
57.
58.
Wittenburg P, Brugman H, Russel A et al (2006) Elan: a professional framework for multimodality research. In: Proceedings of language resources and evaluation conference (LREC)
59.
Hall ET (1982) The hidden dimension. An anthropologist examines humans’ use of space in public and private. Anchor, New York
60.
Hall ET (1974) Handbook for proxemics research. In: Society for the anthropology of visual communication, Washington DC
61.
Howell DC (2010) Statistical methods for psychology, 7th edn. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont
Metadaten
Titel
The Uncanny in the Wild. Analysis of Unscripted Human–Android Interaction in the Field
verfasst von
Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten
Nicole C. Krämer
Christian Becker-Asano
Kohei Ogawa
Shuichi Nishio
Hiroshi Ishiguro
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Social Robotics / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0198-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

International Journal of Social Robotics 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

An Investigation of Responses to Robot-Initiated Touch in a Nursing Context

EditorialNotes

Editorial

Survey

A Survey on Perception Methods for Human–Robot Interaction in Social Robots

OriginalPaper

A Modeling Framework for User-Driven Iterative Design of Autonomous Systems

OriginalPaper

A Pilot Study with a Novel Setup for Collaborative Play of the Humanoid Robot KASPAR with Children with Autism

OriginalPaper

Does the Robot Have a Mind? Mind Perception and Attitudes Towards Robots Predict Use of an Eldercare Robot

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise