nach oben

Management International Review

Erschienen in:

01.04.2013 | Research Article

Revisiting the Trust-performance Link in Strategic Alliances

verfasst von: Prof. Alexander T Mohr, Prof. Jonas Puck

Erschienen in: Management International Review | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

We extend research on the trust-performance link in strategic alliances (SAs) by arguing that the traditional focus of research on the influence of trust on performance of SAs needs to be complemented with a more explicit acknowledgment and analysis of the role that SA performance plays in the development of trust.
Drawing on existing theoretical arguments and empirical findings related to the consequences and determinants of trust we argue for the existence of a bidirectional causal relationship between trust and performance in SAs. We empirically test this bilateral relationship using 3-stage least square regression models on data from 110 strategic alliances.
Our results support the positive effect of SA performance on trust, but not the commonly stressed positive effect of trust on SA performance. We discuss the relevance of this finding for the theory of inter-firm collaboration. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for practitioners and scholars interested in SAs.

Vorheriger Artikel The Industry-focused International Strategy

Nächster Artikel Neither Ghettoed Nor Cosmopolitan

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Management International Review

MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW is a double-blind refereed journal that aims at the advancement and dissemination of research in the fields of International Management.

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Anderson, E. (1990). Two firms, one frontier: On assessing joint venture performance. Sloan Management Review, 31(2), 19–30.

Ariño, A., & de la Torre, J. (1998). Learning from failure: Towards an evolutionary model of collaborative ventures. Organization Science, 9(3), 306–325.CrossRef

Ariño, A., de la Torre, J., & Ring, P. S. (2001). Relational quality: Managing trust in corporate alliances. California Management Review, 44(1), 109.CrossRef

Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(1), 396–402.CrossRef

Aulakh, P. S., Kotabe, M., & Sahay, A. (1996). Trust and performance in cross-border marketing partnerships: A behavioral approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(5), 1005–1032.CrossRef

Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books Inc.

Batt, P. J. (2003). Building trust between growers and market agents. Supply Chain Management, 8(1), 65–78.CrossRef

Berry, H., Guillén, M. F., & Nan, Z. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460–1480.CrossRef

Boersma, M. F., Buckley, P. J., & Ghauri, P. N. (2003). Trust in international joint venture relationships. Journal of Business Research, 56(12), 1031–1042.CrossRef

Bromiley, P., & Harris, J. (2006). Trust, transaction cost economics, and mechanisms. In R. Bachmann & A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of trust resarch (pp. 124–143). Cheltenham: Elgar.

Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1988). A theory of co-operation in international business. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Co-operative strategies and international business (pp. 31–53). Lexington: Lexington Press.

Buckley, P. J., Glaister, K. W., Klijn, E., & Tan, H. (2009). Knowledge accession and knowledge acquisition in strategic alliances: The impact of supplementary and complementary dimensions. British Journal of Management, 20(4), 598–609.CrossRef

Carson, S. J., Madhok, A., Varman, R., & John, G. (2003). Information processing moderators of the effectiveness of trust-based governance in interfirm R&D collaboration. Organization Science, 14(1), 45–56.CrossRef

Chiles, T. H., & McMackin, J. F. (1996). Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 73–99.

Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491–512.

Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Tan, H. H. (2000). The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 563–576.CrossRef

Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2000). The determinants of trust in supplier-automaker relationships in the U.S., Japan, and Korea. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 259–285.CrossRef

Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2003). The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14(1), 57–68.CrossRef

Fink, M., & Kessler, A. (2010). Cooperation, trust and performance: Empirical results from three countries. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 469–483.

Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1–19.CrossRef

Garcia-Canal, E., Valdes-Llaneza, A., & Ariño, A. (2003). Effectiveness of dyadic and multi-party joint ventures. Organization Studies, 24(5), 743–770.CrossRef

Geringer, J. M., & Hébert, L. (1991). Measuring performance of international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2), 249–263.CrossRef

Gong, Y., Shenkar, O., Luo, Y., & Nyaw, M.-K. (2007). Do multiple parents help or hinder international joint venture performance? The mediating roles of contract completeness and partner cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 1021–1034.CrossRef

Gulati, R., & Sytch, M. (2008). Does familiarity breed trust? Revisiting the antecedents of trust. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29(2–3), 165–190.CrossRef

Hagen, J. M., & Choe, S. (1998). Trust in Japanese interfirm relations: Institutional sanctions matter. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 589–600.

Hennart, J.-F. (2006). Alliance research: Less is more. The Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1621–1628.CrossRef

Hennart, J.-F., & Zeng, M. (2005). Structural determinants of joint venture performance. European Management Review, 2(5), 105–115.CrossRef

Inkpen, A. C., & Currall, S. C. (1997). International joint venture trust: An empirical examination. In P. W. Beamish, & J. P. Killing (Eds.), Cooperative strategies: North American perspectives (pp. 308–336). San Francisco: The New Lexington Press.

Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531–546.

Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2009). Managing strategic alliances: What do we know now, and where do we go from here? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 45–62.CrossRef

Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (2002). Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal, 23(9), 795.CrossRef

Krishnan, R., Martin, X., & Noorderhaven, N. G. (2006). When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 894–917.CrossRef

Kwon, Y.-C. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of international joint venture partnerships: A social exchange perspective. International Business Review, 17(5), 559–573.CrossRef

Lane, P., Salk, J. E., & Lyles, M. A. (2001). Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1139–1161.CrossRef

Lu, J. W., & Xu, D. (2006). Growth and survival of international joint ventures: An external-internal legitimacy perspective. Journal of Management, 32(3), 426.CrossRef

Luo, Y. (2008). Procedural fairness and interfirm cooperation in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 27–46.CrossRef

Luo, Y., & Park, S. H. (2004). Multiparty cooperation and performance in international equity joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 142–160.CrossRef

Lyles, M. A., & Baird, I. S. (1994). Performance of international joint ventures in two Eastern European countries: The case of Hungary and Poland. Management International Review, 34(4), 313–329.

Madhok, A. (1995). Revisiting multinational firms’ tolerance for joint ventures: A trust-based approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 117–137.CrossRef

Madhok, A. (2006). How much does ownership really matter? Equity and trust relations in joint venture relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 4–11.CrossRef

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91–103.CrossRef

McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (2006). Does trust still matter? Research on the role of trust in inter-organizational exchange. In R. Bachmann & A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of trust research (pp. 280–300). Cheltenham: Elgar.

Mjoen, H., & Tallman, S. (1997). Control and performance in international joint ventures. Organization Science, 8(3), 257–274.CrossRef

Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135–152.CrossRef

Noteboom, B. (1996). Trust, opportunism and governance: A process and control model. Organization Studies, 17(6), 985–1010.CrossRef

Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (1997). The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity, and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 279–307.CrossRef

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRef

Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.CrossRef

Puck, J. F., Holtbrügge, D., & Mohr, A. T. (2009). Beyond entry mode choice: Explaining the conversion of joint ventures into wholly-owned subsidiaries in the Peoples Republic of China. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3), 388–404.CrossRef

Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483–498.CrossRef

Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.

Robson, M., Katsikeas, C., & Bello, D. (2008). Drivers and performance outcomes of trust in international strategic alliances: The role of organizational complexity. Organization Science, 19(4), 647.CrossRef

Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.CrossRef

Sako, M. (1998). Does trust improve business performance? In C. Lane & R. Bachmann (Eds.), Trust within and between organization (pp. 88–117). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sarkar, M., Cavusgil, S. T., & Evirgen, C. (1997). A commitment-trust mediated framework of international collaborative venture performance. In P. W. Beamish & J. P. Killing (Eds.), Cooperative strategies. North American perspectives (pp. 255–285). San Francisco: The New Lexington Press.

Sarkar, M. B., Raj, E., Cavusgil, S. T., & Preet, S. A. (2001). The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 29(4), 358–373.CrossRef

Svejenova, S. (2006). How much does trust really matter? Some reflections on the significance and implications of Madhok’s trust-based approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 12–20.CrossRef

Van de Ven, A. H., & Ring, P. S. (2006). Relying on trust in cooperative inter-organizational relationships. In R. Bachmann & A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of trust research (pp. 144–164). Cheltenham: Elgar.

Zaheer, A., & Harris, J. (2005). Interorganizational trust. In O. Shenkar & J. J. Reuer (Eds.), Handbook of strategic alliances (pp. 169–197). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Zaheer, A., Lofstrom, S., & George, V. P. (2002). Interpersonal and interorganizational trust in alliances. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies and alliances (pp. 347–377). London: Pergamon.

Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141–159.CrossRef

Zhan, W., & Luo, Y. (2008). Performance implications of capability exploitation and upgrading in international joint ventures. Management International Review, 48(2), 227–253.CrossRef

Titel: Revisiting the Trust-performance Link in Strategic Alliances
verfasst von: Prof. Alexander T Mohr
Prof. Jonas Puck
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2013
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Management International Review / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-8249
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-8901
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-012-0145-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Management International Review

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

The Industry-focused International Strategy

Neither Ghettoed Nor Cosmopolitan

Research on the Import Activities of Firms 1960–2010

Practicing what We Preach

Family Management and Internationalization: The Impact on Firm Performance and Innovation

Biblio Service

Premium Partner