nach oben

Erschienen in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Sources and Distribution of Forest Biomass for Energy

verfasst von : Isabel Malico, Ana Cristina Gonçalves

Erschienen in: Forest Bioenergy

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Forest biomass used for energy or biofuels can be sourced directly from land-use systems, indirectly from wood-based industries or recovered from other human activities outside the forest sector. The former, referring to primary biomass from forests, includes organic products or residues derived directly from living or recently dead trees or other forest vegetation. It constituted nearly half of the world’s harvested forest biomass in 2021 and holds particular importance in the Global South, where traditional biomass remains a vital energy source for many people. Besides direct wood fuel, secondary wood residues represent another substantial source of forest bioenergy. These organic residues, such as wood chips, sawdust or black liquor, are generated by the industries processing wood, especially primary forest industries. A large amount of these residues is well-suited for further material use and energy generation. However, wood suitable for energy is not solely generated by forest-based industries. Various other activities use wood products that eventually reach the end of their usable life and are discarded, such as wood waste from construction or demolition, furniture waste or end-of-life pallets and packaging used to transport goods. This chapter presents and characterises the different woody biomass streams that can provide feedstock for energy.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Introduction to Forest Bioenergy

Nächstes Kapitel Stand Structure and Biomass

Hakkila P, Parikka M (2002) Fuel resources from the forest. Bioenergy from sustainable forestry. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 19–48CrossRef

Batidzirai B, Smeets EMW, Faaij APC (2012) Harmonising bioenergy resource potentials—methodological lessons from review of state of the art bioenergy potential assessments. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:6598–6630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.002CrossRef

FAO (2004) Unified bioenergy terminology (UBET). FAO, Rome

Hoogwijk M, Faaij A, van den Broek R et al (2003) Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy. Biomass Bioenerg 25:119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00191-5CrossRef

Thiffault E, Gianvenuti A, Zuzhang X, Walter S (2023) The role of wood residues in the transition to sustainable bioenergy—analysis of good practices and recommendations for the deployment of wood residues for energy. FAO, Rome

Hall JP (2002) Sustainable production of forest biomass for energy. For Chron 78:391–396. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc78391-3CrossRef

Lattimore B, Smith CT, Titus BD et al (2009) Environmental factors in woodfuel production: opportunities, risks, and criteria and indicators for sustainable practices. Biomass Bioenerg 33:1321–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.06.005CrossRef

Van ‘t Veen H, Eppinga MB, Mwampamba TH, Ferreira Dos Santos MJ (2021) Long term impacts of transitions in charcoal production systems in tropical biomes. Environ Res Lett 16:034009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe14d

Font R, Conesa JA, Moltó J, Muñoz M (2009) Kinetics of pyrolysis and combustion of pine needles and cones. J Anal Appl Pyrol 85:276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2008.11.015CrossRef

10.

Kumar R, Chandrashekar N (2014) Fuel properties and combustion characteristics of some promising bamboo species in India. J For Res 25:471–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0478-6CrossRef

11.

Nepomuceno Pereira R, Malico I, Mesquita P, et al (2017) Energy use of cork residues in the Portuguese cork industry. In: Proceedings of the 12th conference on sustainable development of energy, water and environmental systems—SDEWES2017. Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp 1–20

12.

Mäkelä M, Parkkinen M, Lyytimäki J, Nygrén NA (2020) Futures images of woodchips as an energy source in Finland. Futures 121:102571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102571CrossRef

13.

FAO (2022) Classification of forest products 2022. FAO, Rome

14.

Simal Alves L, da Silva SAM, Dos Anjos AM et al (2014) Particleboard produced with sawmill waste of different wood species. AMR 884–885:689–693. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.884-885.689CrossRef

15.

Trømborg E, Ranta T, Schweinle J et al (2013) Economic sustainability for wood pellets production—a comparative study between Finland, Germany, Norway, Sweden and the US. Biomass Bioenerg 57:68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.030CrossRef

16.

Sjølie HK (2012) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from households and industry by the use of charcoal from sawmill residues in Tanzania. J Clean Prod 27:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.008CrossRef

17.

Cambero C, Hans Alexandre M, Sowlati T (2015) Life cycle greenhouse gas analysis of bioenergy generation alternatives using forest and wood residues in remote locations: a case study in British Columbia, Canada. Resour Conserv Recycl 105:59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.014CrossRef

18.

Koopmans A, Koppejan J (1997) Agricultural and forest residues-generation, utilization and availability. In: Proceedings of the regional consultation on modern applications of biomass energy. FAO, Kuala Lumpur, pp 1–23

19.

Pergola MT, Saulino L, Castellaneta M et al (2022) Towards sustainable management of forest residues in the southern Apennine Mediterranean mountain forests: a scenario-based approach. Ann For Sci 79:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-022-01128-wCrossRef

20.

Hueso-González P, Martínez-Murillo JF, Ruiz-Sinoga JD (2018) Benefits of adding forestry clearance residues for the soil and vegetation of a Mediterranean mountain forest. Sci Total Environ 615:796–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.301CrossRef

21.

Díaz-Yáñez O, Mola-Yudego B, Anttila P et al (2013) Forest chips for energy in Europe: current procurement methods and potentials. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 21:562–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.016CrossRef

22.

Braghiroli FL, Passarini L (2020) Valorization of biomass residues from forest operations and wood manufacturing presents a wide range of sustainable and innovative possibilities. Curr For Rep 6:172–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-020-00112-9CrossRef

23.

Moriana R, Vilaplana F, Ek M (2015) Forest residues as renewable resources for bio-based polymeric materials and bioenergy: chemical composition, structure and thermal properties. Cellulose 22:3409–3423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0738-4CrossRef

24.

Azambuja RDR, Castro VGD, Trianoski R, Iwakiri S (2018) Recycling wood waste from construction and demolition to produce particleboards. Maderas, Cienc tecnol 20:381–690. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-221X2018005041401CrossRef

25.

Sommerhuber PF, Welling J, Krause A (2015) Substitution potentials of recycled HDPE and wood particles from post-consumer packaging waste in wood-plastic composites. Waste Manage 46:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.011CrossRef

26.

Vis M, Mantau U, Allen B (2016) Study on the optimised cascading use of wood. Publications Office, Brussels

27.

EC (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium

28.

Saal U, Weimar H, Mantau U (2017) Wood processing residues. In: Wagemann K, Tippkötter N (eds) Biorefineries. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 27–41CrossRef

29.

ISCC (2020) ISCC CORSIA 201–1 Waste, residues, by-products. ISCC

30.

Schulze K, Malek Ž, Verburg PH (2019) Towards better mapping of forest management patterns: a global allocation approach. For Ecol Manage 432:776–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.001CrossRef

31.

van Asselen S, Verburg PH (2012) A land system representation for global assessments and land-use modeling. Glob Change Biol 18:3125–3148CrossRef

32.

FAO (2020) Global forest resources assessment 2020. FAO

33.

Pan Y, Hu T, Zhu X et al (2012) Mapping cropland distributions using a hard and soft classification model. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 50:4301–4312. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2193403CrossRef

34.

Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J et al (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333:988–993. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609CrossRef

35.

Ameray A, Bergeron Y, Valeria O et al (2021) Forest carbon management: a review of silvicultural practices and management strategies across boreal, temperate and tropical forests. Curr Forestry Rep 7:245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-021-00151-wCrossRef

36.

Friedlingstein P, Jones MW, O’Sullivan M et al (2022) Global carbon budget 2021. Earth Syst Sci Data 14:1917–2005. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022CrossRef

37.

Santoro M, Cartus O (2019) ESA biomass climate change initiative (Biomass_cci): global datasets of forest above-ground biomass for the year 2017, vol 1. Centre for Environmental Data Analysis

38.

Baul TK, Alam A, Strandman H, Kilpeläinen A (2017) Net climate impacts and economic profitability of forest biomass production and utilization in fossil fuel and fossil-based material substitution under alternative forest management. Biomass Bioenerg 98:291–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.02.007CrossRef

39.

Mäkipää R, Abramoff R, Adamczyk B et al (2023) How does management affect soil C sequestration and greenhouse gas fluxes in boreal and temperate forests?—A review. For Ecol Manage 529:120637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120637CrossRef

40.

Gouge D, Thiffault E, Thiffault N (2021) Biomass procurement in boreal forests affected by spruce budworm: effects on regeneration, costs, and carbon balance. Can J For Res 51:1939–1952. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2021-0060CrossRef

41.

Ontl TA, Janowiak MK, Swanston CW et al (2020) Forest management for carbon sequestration and climate adaptation. J Forest 118:86–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz062CrossRef

42.

Vaglio Laurin G, Puletti N, Tattoni C et al (2021) Estimated biomass loss caused by the vaia windthrow in Northern Italy: evaluation of active and passive remote sensing options. Remote Sensing 13:4924. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13234924CrossRef

43.

Titus BD, Brown K, Helmisaari H-S et al (2021) Sustainable forest biomass: a review of current residue harvesting guidelines. Energy Sustain Soc 11:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00281-wCrossRef

44.

Egnell G, Paré D, Thiffault E, Lamers P (2016) Environmental sustainability aspects of forest biomass mobilisation. In: Thiffault E, Berndes G, Junginger M et al (eds) Mobilisation of forest bioenergy in the Boreal and temperate biomes. Elsevier, London, pp 50–67CrossRef

45.

Bruckman VJ, Terada T, Fukuda K et al (2016) Overmature periurban Quercus-Carpinus coppice forests in Austria and Japan: a comparison of carbon stocks, stand characteristics and conversion to high forest. Eur J Forest Res 135:857–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-016-0979-2CrossRef

46.

Stojanović M, Sánchez-Salguero R, Levanič T et al (2017) Forecasting tree growth in coppiced and high forests in the Czech Republic. The legacy of management drives the coming Quercus petraea climate responses. For Ecol Manage 405:56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.021CrossRef

47.

Kalt G, Mayer A, Theurl MC et al (2019) Natural climate solutions versus bioenergy: can carbon benefits of natural succession compete with bioenergy from short rotation coppice? GCB Bioenergy 11:1283–1297. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12626CrossRef

48.

Schweier J, Molina-Herrera S, Ghirardo A et al (2017) Environmental impacts of bioenergy wood production from poplar short-rotation coppice grown at a marginal agricultural site in Germany. GCB Bioenergy 9:1207–1221. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12423CrossRef

49.

Beringer T, Lucht W, Schaphoff S (2011) Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints. GCB Bioenergy 3:299–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01088.xCrossRef

50.

Langeveld H, Quist-Wessel F, Dimitriou I et al (2012) Assessing environmental impacts of short rotation coppice (SRC) expansion: model definition and preliminary results. Bioenerg Res 5:621–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9235-xCrossRef

51.

Rösch C, Aust C, Jörissen J (2013) Envisioning the sustainability of the production of short rotation coppice on grassland. Energ Sustain Soc 3:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-0567-3-7CrossRef

52.

Dimitriou I, Rutz D (2015) Sustainable short rotation coppice a handbook. WIP Renewable Energies, Munich

53.

Hauk S, Gandorfer M, Wittkopf S et al (2017) Ecological diversification is risk reducing and economically profitable—the case of biomass production with short rotation woody crops in south German land-use portfolios. Biomass Bioenerg 98:142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.018CrossRef

54.

Arets EJMM, van der Meer PJ, Verwer CC et al (2011) Global wood production: assessment of industrial round wood supply from forest management systems in different global regions. Wageningen, Alterra

55.

Bizerra Barros I, Santos Cavalcante V, Soares Moulin A et al (2021) Integrating forest residue and mineral fertilization: effects on nutrient acquisition, nutrient use efficiency and growth of eucalypt plants. For Ecol Manage 496:119461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119461CrossRef

56.

Mead DJ (2005) Forests for energy and the role of planted trees. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:407–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680500316391CrossRef

57.

Röser D, Asikainen A, Stupak I, Pasanen K (2008) Forest energy resources and potentials. In: Röser D, Asikainen A, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Stupak I (eds) Sustainable use of forest biomass for energy. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 9–28CrossRef

58.

Stolarski MJ, Krzyżaniak M, Warmiński K et al (2019) Energy efficiency indices for lignocellulosic biomass production: short rotation coppices versus grasses and other herbaceous crops. Ind Crops Prod 135:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.022CrossRef

59.

Daioglou V, Doelman JC, Wicke B et al (2019) Integrated assessment of biomass supply and demand in climate change mitigation scenarios. Glob Environ Chang 54:88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.012CrossRef

60.

Russell MB, Fraver S, Aakala T et al (2015) Quantifying carbon stores and decomposition in dead wood: a review. For Ecol Manage 350:107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.033CrossRef

61.

Shannon VL, Vanguelova EI, Morison JIL et al (2022) The contribution of deadwood to soil carbon dynamics in contrasting temperate forest ecosystems. Eur J Forest Res 141:241–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-021-01435-3CrossRef

62.

FAO (2023) Forest product statistics. https://www.fao.org/forestry/statistics/84922/en/. Accessed 21 Apr 2023

63.

Vanegas Cantarero MM (2020) Of renewable energy, energy democracy, and sustainable development: a roadmap to accelerate the energy transition in developing countries. Energy Res Soc Sci 70:101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101716CrossRef

64.

Bailis R, Drigo R, Ghilardi A, Masera O (2015) The carbon footprint of traditional woodfuels. Nat Clim Chang 5:266–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2491CrossRef

65.

FAO (2022) The state of the world’s forests 2022. Forest pathways for green recovery and building inclusive, resilient and sustainable economies. FAO, Rome

66.

Thiel M, Basiliko N, Caspersen J et al (2015) Operational biomass recovery of small trees: equations for six central Ontario tree species. Can J For Res 45:372–377. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0429CrossRef

67.

UNECE, FAO (2021) Forest sector outlook study 2020–2040. United Nations, Geneva

68.

da Silva LE, Soares ÁAV, Goulart SL et al (2021) Challenges of the lumber production in the Amazon region: relation between sustainability of sawmills, process yield and logs quality. Environ Dev Sustain 23:4924–4948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00797-9CrossRef

69.

Ghafghazi S, Lochhead K, Mathey A-H, et al (2017) Estimating mill residue surplus in Canada: a spatial forest fiber cascade modeling approach. Forest Prod J 67:205–218. https://doi.org/10.13073/FPJ-D-16-00031

70.

Hassan MdK, Villa A, Kuittinen S et al (2019) An assessment of side-stream generation from Finnish forest industry. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21:265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0787-5CrossRef

71.

Knapic S, Pereira H (2003) Rendimentos industriais de pinheiro bravo em serração. Anais do Instituto Superior de Agronomia 223–241

72.

Murata K, Ikami Y, Tonosaki M (2006) Estimate of material recycling flow in the Japanese wood industry

73.

Najera Luna JA, Sanchez Medrano JA, Mendez Gonzalez J (2013) Lumber yield and production time in sawmilling of pallets in Durango, Mexico. Forest Syst 22:573. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2013223-02693CrossRef

74.

Ogunwusi AA (2014) Wood waste generation in the forest industry in Nigeria and prospects for its industrial utilization. Ivil Environ Res 6:62–69

75.

UNECE, FAO (2010) Forest product conversion factors for the UNECE Region United Nations. United Nations, Geneva

76.

Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL (2005) Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the United States Department of Energy (DOE), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN

77.

McGraw B (2009) Recycling veneer-mill residues into engineered products with improved torsional rigidity. West Virginia University Libraries, MSCrossRef

78.

Oliveira RCP, Mateus M, Santos DMF (2018) Chronoamperometric and chronopotentiometric investigation of Kraft black liquor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43:16817–16823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.046CrossRef

79.

Suhr M, Klein G, Kourti I, et al (2015) Best available techniques (BAT) reference document for the production of pulp, paper and board. Luxembourg

80.

Teir S (2002) Modern boiler types and applications. Helsinki University of Technology

81.

EC (2018) Guidance on cascading use of biomass with selected good practice examples on woody biomass. European Commission, Brussels

82.

Mair C, Stern T (2017) Cascading utilization of wood: a matter of circular economy? Curr Forestry Rep 3:281–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-017-0067-yCrossRef

83.

Daian G, Ozarska B (2009) Wood waste management practices and strategies to increase sustainability standards in the Australian wooden furniture manufacturing sector. J Clean Prod 17:1594–1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.07.008CrossRef

84.

Besserer A, Troilo S, Girods P et al (2021) Cascading recycling of wood waste: a review. Polymers 13:1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111752CrossRef

85.

Alakangas E, Koponen K, Sokka L, Keränen J (2015) Classification of used wood to biomass fuel or solid recycled fuel and cascading use in Finland. In: Book of proceeding bioenergy. Jyväskylä, Finland, pp 79–86

86.

WRA (2021) Waste wood assessment guidance for the UK waste wood industry. Wood Recycler’s Association, Inkberrow

87.

UNECE, FAO (2022) Catalogue of wood waste classifications in the UNECE region. FAO, Geneva

88.

Junginger DM, Hennig C, Junginger EM, et al (2019) Transboundary flows of woody biomass waste streams in Europe. IEA Bioenergy

89.

Faraca G, Boldrin A, Astrup T (2019) Resource quality of wood waste: the importance of physical and chemical impurities in wood waste for recycling. Waste Manage 87:135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.005CrossRef

90.

FAO, UNECE (2021) Circularity concepts in forest-based industries. FAO, Geneva

91.

Cocchi M, Vargas M, Tokacova K (2019) Absorbing the potential of wood Waste in EU regions and industrial bio-based ecosystems—BioReg. EUBIA

Titel: Sources and Distribution of Forest Biomass for Energy
verfasst von: Isabel Malico
Ana Cristina Gonçalves
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Forest Bioenergy
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48223-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-48224-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48224-3_2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"