Skip to main content
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

Open Access 2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Spoiler Alert

verfasst von : Agustin Chevez

Erschienen in: The Pilgrim’s Guide to the Workplace

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
loading …

Abstract

Not long after I returned from my pilgrimage, I was approached by a publisher requesting an article about isolation in the workplace [3]. It was in response to tragic events that transpired at the remote Bellingshausen Station in Antarctica. The incident involved a researcher allegedly stabbing a colleague for giving away the endings of the books he was reading [4]. One spoiler too many led to the unfortunate stabbing.
Not long after I returned from my pilgrimage, I was approached by a publisher requesting an article about isolation in the workplace [3]. It was in response to tragic events that transpired at the remote Bellingshausen Station in Antarctica. The incident involved a researcher allegedly stabbing a colleague for giving away the endings of the books he was reading [4]. One spoiler too many led to the unfortunate stabbing.
Contrary to the popular view that spoilers diminish suspense and impair enjoyment by revealing the end of a story before it begins, it has been found that: “spoilers may allow readers to organise developments, anticipate the implications of events, and resolve ambiguities that occur in the course of reading” [5].
And this is why I’m going to reveal the outcome of my pilgrimage now, because what I am about to uncover may be uncomfortable for some and it will most definitely be an idea that benefits from early discussion. So here is the spoiler and second signpost:
I admit this is a bold and provocative statement. Especially, because it’s hard to imagine a suggestion that would clash more with the assumptions we have used to shape the workplace as a temple to rationality, supporting the relentless worship of optimised production. Yet, my pilgrimage created a different view of work environments – it worked.
Absurdity is a rich, layered concept. To entice you with its potential, let’s consider its inconsistency of logic and blatant disregard for the incompatibility between two propositions that cannot both be true. Now, consider the innovation, transformational idea, or whatever term you use to describe a future that you once thought was impossible if those two propositions turn out to be simultaneously true.
Despite its outrageousness, Signpost 2 is firmly grounded in the principle that the best environments to host the ever-evolving concept of work are those which nurture our human qualities. In particular, those which set us apart from machines, artificial intelligence, and every other technology that aims to replace our body and mind. That human quality, I believe, is our ability to be absurd.
Consequently, a key signpost throughout our journey is:
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chevez A (2018) The benefits – and pitfalls – of working in isolation. The Conversation, 9 Novembre 2018 Chevez A (2018) The benefits – and pitfalls – of working in isolation. The Conversation, 9 Novembre 2018
4.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Neill N (2018) Antarctica scientist stabbed colleague for spoiling book endings. New York Post, 30 October 2018 O’Neill N (2018) Antarctica scientist stabbed colleague for spoiling book endings. New York Post, 30 October 2018
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Leavitt J, Christenfeld N (2011) Story spoilers don’t spoil stories. Psychol Sci 22(9):1152–1154CrossRef Leavitt J, Christenfeld N (2011) Story spoilers don’t spoil stories. Psychol Sci 22(9):1152–1154CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Spoiler Alert
verfasst von
Agustin Chevez
Copyright-Jahr
2022
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4759-9_3

Premium Partner