Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Familienunternehmen und CSR

verfasst von : Eva Wagner, Markus Dick, Andreas Hack

Erschienen in: Herausforderungen im Management von Familienunternehmen

Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag diskutiert individuelle Charakteristika und motivationale Aspekte von Entscheider*innen als Einflussfaktoren auf das Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)-Engagement in Familienunternehmen und setzt sich in diesem Zusammenhang mit den führenden (familienbezogenen) Theorien und Konzepten auseinander. Der Beitrag nimmt damit im CSR-Familienunternehmensforschungsfeld eine „microfoundational-lens“-Perspektive ein. Damit wird der Blick auf individuelle Merkmale von Entscheider*innen in Familienunternehmen bei CSR-Investitionen geschärft, aber auch das Zusammenspiel mit dem Familieneinfluss bzw. dem Socioemotional Wealth (SEW) kritisch beleuchtet.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel Corporate Social Responsibility vor und während der COVID-19-Pandemie – Erkenntnisse aus einer mittleren, familiengeführten Druckerei
Literatur
Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Science, 58(2), 219–235.CrossRef
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.CrossRef
Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and Identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715–753.CrossRef
Al-Shammari, M., Rasheed, A., & Al-Shammari, H. A. (2019). CEO narcissism and corporate social responsibility: Does CEO narcissism affect CSR focus? Journal of Business Research, 104, 106–117.CrossRef
Andreoni, J., & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 293–312.CrossRef
Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73–95.CrossRef
Attig, N., & Brockman, P. (2017). The Local Roots of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3), 479–496.CrossRef
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.CrossRef
Bansal, S., Lopez-Perez, M., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2018). Board independence and corporate social responsibility disclosure: The mediating role of the presence of family ownership. Administrative Sciences, 8(3), 33–54.CrossRef
Barbato, C. A., Graham, E. E., & Perse, E. M. (2003). Communicating in the family: An examination of the relationship of family communication climate and interpersonal communication motives. Journal of Family Communication, 3(3), 123–148.CrossRef
Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1–19.CrossRef
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gómez-Mejía, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.CrossRef
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gómez-Mejía, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82–113.CrossRef
Beutel, A. M., & Marini, M. M. (1995). Gender and values. American Sociological Review, 60(3), 436–448.CrossRef
Bhatnagar, N., Sharma, P., & Ramachandran, K. (2020). Spirituality and Corporate Philanthropy in Indian Family Firms: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(4), 715–728.CrossRef
Block, J. H., & Wagner, M. (2014a). Ownership versus management effects on corporate social responsibility concerns in large family and founder firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(4), 339–346.CrossRef
Block, J. H., & Wagner, M. (2014b). The effect of family ownership on different dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from large US firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(7), 475–492.CrossRef
Borghesi, R., Houston, J. F., & Naranjo, A. (2014). Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests. Journal of Corporate Finance, 26, 164–181.CrossRef
Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 185–197.CrossRef
Bouslah, K., Kryzanowski, L., & M’zali, B. (2013). The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(4), 1258–1273.CrossRef
Brammer, S., Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. (2007). Religion and Attitudes to Corporate Social Responsibility in a Large Cross-Country Sample. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 229–243.CrossRef
Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383.CrossRef
Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363–423.CrossRef
Canavati, S. (2018). Corporate social performance in family firms: a meta-analysis. Journal of Family Business Management, 8(3), 235–273.CrossRef
Campbell, W. K., Goodie, A. S., & Foster, J. D. (2004). Narcissism, confidence, and risk attitude. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17(4), 297–311.CrossRef
Campopiano, G., & De Massis, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility reporting: A content analysis in family and non-family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 511–534.CrossRef
Campopiano, G., De Massis, A., & Cassia, L. (2012). The relationship between motivations and actions in corporate social responsibility: An exploratory study. International Journal of Business and Society, 13(3), 391–425.
Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez–Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family–controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1153–1173.
Chen, Y., & Li, S. X. (2009). Group identity and social preferences. American Economic Review, 99(1), 431–457.CrossRef
Chen, J., Zhang, Z., & Jia, M. (2021). How CEO narcissism affects corporate social responsibility choice? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38, 897–924.CrossRef
Chen, W. T., Zhou, G. S., & Zhu, X. K. (2019). CEO tenure and corporate social responsibility performance. Journal of Business Research, 95, 292–302.CrossRef
Child, J., & Tsai, T. (2005). The dynamic between firms’ environmental strategies and institutional constraints in emerging economies: Evidence from China and Taiwan. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 95–125.CrossRef
Chintrakarn, P., Jiraporn, P., Tong, S., & Chatjuthamard, P. (2017a). Exploring the Effect of Religious Piety on Corporate Governance: Evidence from Anti-takeover Defenses and Historical Religious Identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3), 469–476.CrossRef
Chintrakarn, P., Tong, S., & Jiraporn, P. (2017b). The Effect of Religious Piety on Managerial Entrenchment: Evidence from Entrenched Boards of Directors. Applied Economics Letters, 24(19), 1417–1422.CrossRef
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Steier, L. (2005). Sources and consequences of distinctive familiness: An introduction. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(3), 237–247.
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Pearson, A. W., & Barnett, T. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(2), 267–293.
Cronqvist, H., & Yu, F. (2017). Shaped by their daughters: Executives, female socialization, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 126(3), 543–562.CrossRef
Cruz, C., Larraza-Kintana, M., Garcés-Galdeano, L., & Berrone, P. (2014). Are Family Firms Really More Socially Responsible? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1295–1316.
Cui, J., Jo, H., & Velasquez, M. G. (2015). The Influence of Christian Religiosity on Managerial Decisions Concerning the Environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 203–231.CrossRef
Cui, J., Jo, H., & Velasquez, M. G. (2016). Community Religion, Employees, and the Social License to Operate. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), 775–807.CrossRef
Cui, V., Ding, S., Liu, M., & Wu, Z. (2018). Revisiting the effect of family involvement on corporate social responsibility: A behavioral agency perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 291–309.CrossRef
Debrulle, J., Steffens, P., De Bock, K. W., De Winne, S., & Maes, J. (2023). Configurations of business founder resources, strategy, and environment determining new venture performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(2), 1023–1061.CrossRef
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.CrossRef
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134.CrossRef
De Massis, A., & Foss, N. J. (2018). Advancing family business research: The promise of microfoundations. Family Business Review, 31(4), 386–396.CrossRef
DellaVigna, S., List, J. A., Malmendier, U., & Rao, G. (2013). The importance of being marginal: Gender differences in generosity. American Economic Review, 103(3), 586–590.CrossRef
Déniz, M. D. L. C. D., & Suárez, M. K. C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and family business in Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(1), 27–41.CrossRef
Dick, M., Wagner, E., & Pernsteiner, H. (2021). Founder-controlled family firms, overconfidence, and corporate social responsibility engagement: Evidence from survey data. Family Business Review, 34(1), 71–92.CrossRef
Di Giuli, A., & Kostovetsky, L. (2014). Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 158–180.CrossRef
Du, X., Jian, W., Zeng, Q., & Du, Y. (2014). Corporate Environmental Responsibility in Polluting Industries: Does Religion Matter? Journal of Business Ethics,124(3), 485–507.CrossRef
Dyer, Jr. W. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(6), 785–802.
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.CrossRef
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132.CrossRef
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406.CrossRef
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Wang, H., & Kwok, C. C. (2016). Family control and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 73(C), 131–146.CrossRef
Elia, S., Greve, P., Vallone, T., & Castellani, D. (2021). The micro-foundations of industrial diversification through foreign acquisitions: The multifaceted role of CEO experience. Long Range Planning, 54(6), 102104.CrossRef
Ernst, R. A., Gerken, M., Hack, A., & Hülsbeck, M. (2022a). Family firms as agents of sustainable development: A normative perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121135.CrossRef
Ernst, R. A., Gerken, M., Hack, A., & Hülsbeck, M. (2022b). SMES’ reluctance to embrace corporate sustainability: The effect of stakeholder pressure on self-determination and the role of social proximity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 335, 130273.CrossRef
Esparza Aguilar, J. L., & Reyes Fong, T. (2019). Practices of corporate social responsibility developed by Mexican family businesses and their impact on competitive success and innovation. TEC Empresarial, 13(2), 45–57.
Faccio, M., Marchica, M. T., & Mura, R. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193–209.CrossRef
Faller, C. M., & zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. (2018). Does equity ownership matter for corporate social responsibility? A literature review of theories and recent empirical findings. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 15–40.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. The journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327–349.CrossRef
Fathallah, R., Sidani, Y., & Khalil, S. (2020). How Religion Shapes Family Business Ethical Behaviors: An Institutional Logics Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(4), 647–659.CrossRef
Fehre, K., & Weber, F. (2019). Why some are more equal: Family firm heterogeneity and the effect on management’s attention to CSR. Business Ethics: A European Review, 28(3), 321–334.CrossRef
Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Ritchie, L. D. (1994). Communication schemata within the family: Multiple perspectives on family interaction. Human Communication Research, 20(3), 275–301.CrossRef
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Social capital and the global economy. Foreign Affairs, 74(5), 89–103.CrossRef
Garces-Galdeano, L., Larraza-Kintana, M., Cruz, C., & Contin-Pilart, I. (2017). Just about money? CEO satisfaction and firm performance in small family firms. Small Business Economics, 49(4), 825–839.CrossRef
Gavana, G., Gottardo, P., & Moisello, A. M. (2017). Earnings management and CSR disclosure. Family vs. non-family firms. Sustainability, 9(12), 1–21.
Gerken, M., Hülsbeck, M., Ostermann, T., & Hack, A. (2022). Validating the FIBER scale to measure family firm heterogeneity–A replication study with extensions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(4), 100497.CrossRef
Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond Beliefs: Religions Bind Individuals into Moral Communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 140–150.CrossRef
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Puri, M. (2013). Managerial attitudes and corporate actions. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1), 103–121.CrossRef
Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–445.CrossRef
Gómez-Mejia, L. R., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Makri, M. (2003). The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 226–237.CrossRef
Gómez-Mejia, L. R., Chirico, F., Martin, G., & Baù, M. (2022). Best among the worst or worst among the best? Socioemotional wealth and risk-performance returns for family and non-family firms under financial distress. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. https://​doi.​org/​10.​25384/​SAGE.​c.​5864762.​v1
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.CrossRef
Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Descriptive, instrumental, and normative aspects. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 235–248.CrossRef
Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369–406.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.CrossRef
Hayward, M. L. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Explaining the Premiums Paid for Large Acquisitions: Evidence of CEO Hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 103–127.CrossRef
Hegde, S. P., & Mishra, D. R. (2019). Married CEOs and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 226–246.CrossRef
Hiebl, M. R. (2013). Risk aversion in family firms: what do we really know? The Journal of Risk Finance, 14(1), 49–70.CrossRef
Hiller, N. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (hyper-)core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 297–319.CrossRef
Hirshleifer, D., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. (2012). Are overconfident CEOs better innovators? Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1457–1498.CrossRef
Huang, Y. C., Ding, H. B., & Kao, M. R. (2009). Salient stakeholder voices: Family business and green innovation adoption. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(3), 309–326.CrossRef
Hülsbeck, M., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2019). The board value protection function in young, mature and family firms. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 437–458.CrossRef
Iguchi, H., Katayama, H., & Yamanoi, J. (2022). CEOs’ Religiosity and Corporate Green Initiatives. Small Business Economics, 58(1), 497–522.CrossRef
Jaw, Y. L., & Lin, W. T. (2009). Corporate elite characteristics and firm’s internationalization: CEO-level and TMT-level roles. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(1), 220–233.CrossRef
Kellermanns, W., Eddleston, K., & Zellweger, T. (2012). Extending the socioemotional wealth perspective: A look at the dark. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1175–1182.
Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1997). Family type and conflict: The impact of conversation orientation and conformity orientation on conflict in the family. Communication Studies, 48(1), 59–75.CrossRef
Kraiczy, N. D., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2014). New product portfolio performance in family firms. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1065–1073.CrossRef
Kraiczy, N. D., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015). What makes a family firm innovative? CEO risk-taking propensity and the organizational context of family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 334–348.CrossRef
Kraus, S., Rehman, S. U., & García, F. J. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120262.CrossRef
Kuttner, M., Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B., & Mitter, C. (2021). Corporate social responsibility in Austrian family firms: socioemotional wealth and stewardship insights from a qualitative approach. Journal of Family Business Management, 11(2), 238–253.CrossRef
Lähdesmäki, M., Siltaoja, M., & Spence, L. J. (2019). Stakeholder salience for small businesses: A social proximity perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(2), 373–385.CrossRef
Lamb, N. H., & Butler, F. C. (2018). The influence of family firms and institutional owners on corporate social responsibility performance. Business & Society, 57(7), 1374–1406.CrossRef
Laspita, S., Breugst, N., Heblich, S., & Patzelt, H. (2012). Intergenerational transmission of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(4), 414–435.CrossRef
Li, J., & Tang, Y. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 45–68.CrossRef
Li, W., Au, K. Y., He, A., & Song, L. (2015). Why Do Family-controlled Firms Donate to Charity? The Role of Intrafamily Succession Intention, Social Status, and Religiosity. Management and Organization Review, 11(4), 621–644.CrossRef
López-González, E., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Meca, E. (2019). Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A contingency approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 1044–1064.CrossRef
Magrizos, S., Apospori, E., Carrigan, M., & Jones, R. (2021). Is CSR the panacea for SMEs? A study of socially responsible SMEs during economic crisis. European Management Journal, 39(2), 291–303.CrossRef
Mahto, R. V., Davis, P. S., Pearce, J. A., & Robinson Jr, R. B. (2010). Satisfaction with firm performance in family businesses. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(5), 985–1002.
Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661–2700.CrossRef
Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 20–43.CrossRef
Malmendier, U., Tate, G., & Yan, J. (2011). Overconfidence and early-life experiences: The effect of managerial traits on corporate financial policies. Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1687–1733.CrossRef
Málovics, G., Csigéné, N. N., & Kraus, S. (2008). The role of corporate social responsibility in strong sustainability. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(3), 907–918.CrossRef
Marques, P., Presas, P., & Simon, A. (2014). The heterogeneity of family firms in CSR engagement: The role of values. Family Business Review, 27(3), 206–227.CrossRef
Mazereeuw-van der Duijn Schouten, C., Graafland, J., & Kaptein, M. (2014). Religiosity, CSR Attitudes, and CSR Behavior: An Empirical Study of Executives’ Religiosity and CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 437–459.CrossRef
McCarthy, S., Oliver, B., & Song, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and CEO confidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 75, 280–291.CrossRef
McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, J. P., & Wang, M. (2017). The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 75–99.CrossRef
McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.CrossRef
Meier, O., & Schier, G. (2020). CSR and family CEO: The moderating role of CEO’s age. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(1), 1–18.
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Harvard Business School Press. Boston.
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19(1), 73–87.CrossRef
Minbaeva, D., & Santangelo, G. D. (2018). Boundary spanners and intra-MNC knowledge sharing: The roles of controlled motivation and immediate organizational context. Global Strategy Journal, 8(2), 220–241.CrossRef
Miroshnychenko, I., De Massis, A., Barontini, R., & Testa, F. (2022). Family firms and environmental performance: A meta-analytic review. Family Business Review, 35(1), 68–90.CrossRef
Monsma, S. V. (2007). Religion and Philanthropic Giving and Volunteering: Building Blocks for Civic Responsibility. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 3, 1–28.
Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2004). Family control and the rent–seeking society. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28(4), 391–409.
Nicholls, J. G., Cobb, P., Yackel, E., Wood, T. & Wheatley, G. (1990). Students’ theories of mathematics and their mathematical knowledge: multiple dimensions of assessment. In G. Kulm (Hrsg.), Assessing Higher Order Thinking in Mathematics (S. 137-154). Washington DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business & Society, 40(4), 369–396.CrossRef
Petrenko, O. V., Aime, F., Ridge, J., & Hill, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 262–279.CrossRef
Preslmayer, C., Kuttner, M., & Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B. (2018). Uncovering the research field of corporate social responsibility in family firms: a citation analysis. Journal of Family Business Management, 8(2), 169–195.CrossRef
Quazi, A. M., & O’Brien, D. (2000). An empirical test of a cross-national model of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(1), 33–51.CrossRef
Rees, W., & Rodionova, T. (2015). The influence of family ownership on corporate social responsibility: An international analysis of publicly listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(3), 184–202.CrossRef
Rieger, M. O., Wang, M., & Hens, T. (2011). Prospect theory around the world. Discussion Paper 2011/19. Bergen: NHH Department of Finance and Management Science.
Ritchie, L. D., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Family communication patterns: Measuring intrapersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships. Communication Research, 17(4), 523–544.CrossRef
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRef
Schaefer, P. S., Williams, C. C., Goodie, A. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2004). Overconfidence and the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(5), 473–480.CrossRef
Schrand, C. M., & Zechman, S. L. C. (2012). Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53, 311–329.CrossRef
Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 1010–1028.CrossRef
Sciascia, S., Clinton, E., Nason, R. S., James, A. E., & Rivera-Algarin, J. O. (2013). Family communication and innovativeness in family firms. Family Relations, 62(3), 429–442.CrossRef
Serfling, M. A. (2014). CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25, 251–273.CrossRef
Spence, L. J. (2016). Small business social responsibility: Expanding core CSR theory. Business & Society, 55(1), 23–55.CrossRef
Su, S., Zhu, F., & Zhou, H. (2022). A Systematic Literature Review on Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms. Sustainability, 14(13), 7817.CrossRef
Tang Y, Mack DZ, & Chen G (2018). The differential effects of CEO narcissism and hubris on corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 39(5), 1370–1387.CrossRef
Tang, Y., Qian, C., Chen, G., & Shen, R. (2015). How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir)responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 36(9), 1338–1357.CrossRef
Uhlaner, L. M., Berent-Braun, M. M., Jeurissen, R. J., & de Wit, G. (2012). Beyond size: Predicting engagement in environmental management practices of Dutch SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4), 411–429.CrossRef
Warner, R. L., & Steel, B. S. (1999). Child rearing as a mechanism for social change: The relationship of child gender to parents’ commitment to gender equity. Gender & Society, 13(4), 503–517.CrossRef
Xiang, C., Chen, F., Jones, P., & Xia, S. (2021). The effect of institutional investors’ distraction on firms’ corporate social responsibility engagement: evidence from China. Review of Managerial Science 15(6), 1645–1681.CrossRef
Xu, S., & Ma, P. (2022). CEOs’ Poverty Experience and Corporate Social Responsibility: Are CEOs Who Have Experienced Poverty More Generous? Journal of Business Ethics, 180, 747–776.CrossRef
Yu, A., Ding, H. B., & Chung, H. M. (2015). Corporate social responsibility performance in family and non-family firms: The perspective of socio-emotional wealth. Asian Business & Management, 14, 383–412.CrossRef
Zou, Z., Wu, Y., Zhu, Q., & Yang, S. (2018). Do female executives prioritize corporate social responsibility? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(13), 2965–2981.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Familienunternehmen und CSR
verfasst von
Eva Wagner
Markus Dick
Andreas Hack
Copyright-Jahr
2023
Buch
Herausforderungen im Management von Familienunternehmen

Print ISBN: 978-3-658-41977-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-41978-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2023

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41978-3_1

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise