nach oben

Review of Accounting Studies

Erschienen in:

01.12.2013

Textual risk disclosures and investors’ risk perceptions

verfasst von: Todd Kravet, Volkan Muslu

Erschienen in: Review of Accounting Studies | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

We examine the association between changes in companies’ textual risk disclosures in 10-K filings and changes in stock market and analyst activity around the filings. We find that annual increases in risk disclosures are associated with increased stock return volatility and trading volume around and after the filings. Increases in risk disclosures are also associated with more dispersed forecast revisions around the filings. In contrast to prior literature documenting resolved uncertainties in response to various types of company disclosures, our findings suggest that textual risk disclosures increase investors’ risk perceptions. However, the results are less pronounced for firm-level disclosures that deviate from those of other companies in the same industry and year. These results lend support for critics’ arguments that firm-level risk disclosures are more likely to be boilerplate.

Vorheriger Artikel Target’s earnings quality and bidders’ takeover decisions

Nächster Artikel Optimal versus suboptimal choices of accounting expertise on audit committees and earnings quality

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Not all forward-looking disclosures resolve uncertainties. Rogers et al. (2009) document higher implied volatilities derived from exchange-traded options around managerial forecasts (especially around irregular managerial forecasts and forecasts that convey bad news).

FRR No. 48 mandates these disclosures to be made as Item 7A as described in Item 305 of Regulation S–K introduced under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which had encouraged registrants to provide market risk disclosures.

These factors have to be provided under the caption “Risk Factors” (as Item 1A in the 10-K filing) as described in Item 503(c) of Regulation S–K introduced under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

A related strand of literature examines how information precision and asymmetry affect the cost of capital (Diamond and Verrecchia 1991; Botosan 1997; Francis et al. 2004; Easley and O’Hara 2004; Lambert et al. 2007; Bhattacharya et al. 2009; Kravet and Shevlin 2010).

The theoretical literature on risk disclosures focuses on cost of capital. Jorgensen and Kirschenheiter (2003) propose a partial disclosure equilibrium, in which managers voluntarily disclose (not disclose) if their firm has low (high) variance of future cash flows, and the disclosing firm has a lower risk premium ex post.

We use the TextPipe software to convert rich text formatted files from 10-K Wizard to ASCII-code formatted files.

We acknowledge that this algorithm does not perfectly measure the intensity of risk disclosures in annual reports. For instance, our algorithm defines tables as single sentences, some of which present extensive information about how future performance can vary with respect to various factors. Furthermore, we do not differentiate between audited risk statements that are in the footnotes and unaudited risk statements that are elsewhere in the annual report. However, the changes methodology of our tests should prevent such measurement errors affecting our conclusions. Further, our out-of-sample validation tests (untabulated) show that our routine is well-specified and powerful.

Alternative methods to measure changes in textual risk disclosures involve examining the rate of change in the frequency of specific words within the text or frequency of word groups within a sentence (Brown and Tucker 2011; Nelson and Pritchard 2007).

For this comparison, we calculate the Li (2006) and Campbell et al. (2011) risk disclosure measures on sentence basis rather than word basis, because this is the form for which we have the data to calculate these measures.

Our analysis is constrained by the possibility of other news that may correlate with risk disclosures over long windows. Therefore our causality interpretation is potentially confounded, but—we argue—this is less likely with our study than for studies investigating changes in longer horizons such as years.

There are also arguments that firm-level stock return volatility is associated with noise and less information about the company (Roll 1988). However, this view seems to have lost support in recent years (Liu and Wysocki 2007).

Differential belief revision around disclosures can arise from either (1) differential interpretations of the disclosures or (2) differences in the precision of investors’ pre-disclosure information.

A meaningful number of analysts is needed to compute the standard deviation of forecast revisions. The results are similar if the number of analysts used is higher or lower than five.

ΔMarket Return Volatility and ΔMarket Return are calculated excluding daily returns from the three-day window centered on the 10-K filing date.

The results are essentially the same when standard errors are clustered for filing quarter or filing year.

In order to fully capture analysts’ differential interpretations around 10-K filings, we try two dependent variable alternatives to σ(Forecast Revision). First, ΔForecast Dispersion is the difference in standard deviation of one-year-ahead earnings forecasts issued during the first 2 months after the filings and during the last 2 months before the filings. Second, KP Forecast Divergence is the proportion of all pairs of analysts’ forecast revisions that diverge from each other (Kandel and Pearson 1995). While these two variables correlate positively with ΔRisk Disclosure, the related coefficient estimates in Eq. (1) are not significant.

In untabulated tests, we include firm fixed-effects and find similar results as those that are reported.

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (1987). Report on the task force on risks and uncertainties. New York.

Bamber, L., Barron, O., & Stober, T. (1999). Differential interpretations and trading volume. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 34, 369–386.CrossRef

Bamber, L., & Cheon, Y. (1995). Differential price and volume reactions to accounting earnings announcements. The Accounting Review, 70, 417–441.

Barron, O., Byard, D., & Kim, O. (2002). Changes in analysts’ information around earnings announcements. The Accounting Review, 77, 821–846.CrossRef

Barron, O., Kim, O., Lim, S. C., & Stevens, D. E. (1998). Using analysts’ forecasts to measure properties of analysts’ information environment. The Accounting Review, 73, 421–433.

Barry, C., & Brown, S. (1985). Differential information and security market equilibrium. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20, 407–422.CrossRef

Beyer, A., Cohen, D. A., Lys, T. Z., & Walther, B. R. (2010). The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 296–343.CrossRef

Bhattacharya, N., Ecker, F., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2009). Direct and mediated associations among earnings quality, information asymmetry, and the cost of equity. Working paper, Southern Methodist University.

Botosan, C. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review, 72, 323–349.

Brown, S. V., & Tucker, J. W. (2011). Large-sample evidence on firms’ year-over-year MD&A modifications. Journal of Accounting Research, 49, 309–346.CrossRef

Bushee, B., & Noe, C. (2000). Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 171–202.CrossRef

Campbell, J. L., Chen, H., Dhaliwal, D. S., Lu, M., & Steele, L. B. (2011). The information content of mandatory risk factor disclosures in corporate filings. Working paper, University of Arizona.

Caskey, J. A. (2009). Information in equity markets with ambiguity-averse investors. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 3595–3627.CrossRef

Clement, M., Frankel, R., & Miller, J. (2003). Confirming management earnings forecasts, earnings uncertainty, and stock returns. Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 653–679.CrossRef

Consumer Electronics Daily. (2006). Take-two warns again on results, extends pacts with key rockstar talent. February 2.

Cready, W. M. (2007). Understanding rational expectations models of financial markets: A guide for the analytically challenged. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas.

Cready, W. M., & Hurtt, D. N. (2002). Assessing investor response to information events using return and volume metrics. The Accounting Review, 77, 891–909.CrossRef

Davis, A., & Tama-Sweet, I. (2012). Managers’ use of language across alternative disclosure outlets: Earnings press releases versus MD&A. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29, 804–837.CrossRef

Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance, 46, 1325–1359.CrossRef

Dye, R. A. (1985). Disclosure of nonproprietary information. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 123–145.CrossRef

Easley, D., & O’Hara, M. (2004). Information and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance, 59, 1553–1583.CrossRef

Epstein, L. G., & Schneider, M. (2008). Ambiguity, information quality, and asset pricing. Journal of Finance, 63, 197–228.CrossRef

Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (1990). Employers’ accounting for postretirement benefits other than pensions. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106. Norwalk, CT.

Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (1998). Accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133. Norwalk, CT.

Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2000). Accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140. Norwalk, CT.

Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2010). Conceptual framework of financial reporting. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8. Norwalk, CT.

Feldman, R., Govindaraj, S., Livnat, J., & Segal, B. (2010). Management’s tone change, post earnings announcement drift and accruals. Review of Accounting Studies, 15, 915–953.CrossRef

Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. M., & Schipper, K. (2004). Costs of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review, 79, 967–1010.CrossRef

Garfinkel, J. A. (2009). Measuring investors’ opinion divergence. Journal of Accounting Research, 47, 1317–1348.CrossRef

Hodder, L., Koonce, L., & McAnally, M. L. (2001). Behavioral implications of the SEC market risk disclosures. Accounting Horizons, 15, 49–70.CrossRef

Ivers, M. (1991). The random house guide to good writing. New York: Random House.

Johnson, S. (2010). SEC pushes companies for more risk information. CFO Magazine, August 2.

Jorgensen, B. N., & Kirschenheiter, M. T. (2003). Discretionary risk disclosures. The Accounting Review, 78, 449–469.CrossRef

Jorion, P. (2002). How informative are value-at-risk disclosures? The Accounting Review, 77, 911–931.CrossRef

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.CrossRef

Kandel, E., & Pearson, N. D. (1995). Differential interpretation of public signals and trade in speculative markets. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 831–872.CrossRef

Kaplan, R. S. (2011). Accounting scholarship that advances professional knowledge and practice. The Accounting Review, 86, 367–383.CrossRef

Karpoff, J. M. (1986). A theory of trading volume. Journal of Finance, 41, 1069–1087.CrossRef

Kim, O., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1991). Trading volume and price reactions to public announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 302–321.CrossRef

Kim, O., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1994). Market liquidity and volume around earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 41–67.CrossRef

Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Koonce, L., McAnally, M. L., & Mercer, M. (2005). How do investors judge the risk of financial and derivative instruments? The Accounting Review, 80, 221–241.CrossRef

Kothari, S. P., Shu, S., & Wysocki, P. D. (2009). Do managers withhold bad news? Journal of Accounting Research, 47, 241–276.CrossRef

Kravet, T., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Accounting restatements and information risk. Review of Accounting Studies, 15, 264–294.CrossRef

Lambert, R., Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2007). Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 45, 385–420.CrossRef

Lang, M. H., & Lundholm, R. J. (1996). Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review, 71, 467–492.

Lehavy, R., Li, F., & Merkley, K. (2011). The effect of annual report readability on analyst following and the properties of their earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 86, 1087–1115.CrossRef

Li, F. (2006). Do stock market investors understand the risk sentiment of corporate annual reports? Working paper, University of Michigan.

Li, F. (2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45, 221–247.CrossRef

Li, F. (2010a). Textual analysis of corporate disclosures: A survey of literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 29, 143–165.

Li, F. (2010b). The information content of forward-looking statements in corporate filings—A naïve Bayesian machine learning approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 48, 1049–1102.CrossRef

Linsmeier, T. J., & Pearson, N. D. (1997). Quantitative disclosures of market risk in the SEC release. Accounting Horizons, 11, 107–135.

Linsmeier, T. J., Thornton, D. B., Venkatachalam, M., & Welker, M. (2002). The effect of mandated market risk disclosures on trading volume sensitivity to interest rate, exchange rate, and commodity price movements. The Accounting Review, 77, 343–377.CrossRef

Liu, M., & Wysocki, P. (2007). Operating risk, information risk, and cost of capital. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University.

McAnally, M. L., Neel, M., & Rees, L. (2011). CEO incentives and downside risk. Working paper, Texas A&M University.

Mohanram, P. S., & Sunder, S. V. (2006). How has regulation FD affected the operations of financial analysts? Contemporary Accounting Research, 23, 491–525.CrossRef

Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Yu, W. (2000). The information content of stock markets: Why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements? Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 215–260.CrossRef

Muslu, V., Radhakrishnan, S., Subramanyam, K. R., & Lim, D. (2011). Firm’s information environment and forward-looking disclosures in the MD&A. Working paper, University of Houston, University of Southern California, and University of Texas at Dallas.

Nelson, K. K., & Pritchard, A. C. (2007). Litigation risk and voluntary disclosure: The use of meaningful cautionary language. Working paper, Rice University.

Nichols, D. C., & Wieland, M. M. (2009). Do firms’ nonfinancial disclosures enhance the value of analyst services? Working paper, Cornell University.

Potter, G. (1992). Accounting earnings announcements, institutional investor concentration, and common stock returns. Journal of Accounting Research, 30, 146–155.CrossRef

Rajgopal, S. (1999). Early evidence on the informativeness of the SEC’s market risk disclosures: The case of commodity price risk exposure of oil and gas producers. The Accounting Review, 74, 251–280.CrossRef

Rogers, J., Skinner, D. J., & Van Buskirk, A. (2009). Earnings guidance and market uncertainty. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48, 90–109.CrossRef

Roll, R. (1988). R². Journal of Finance, 43, 541–566.

Schrand, C. M., & Elliott, J. A. (1998). Risk and financial reporting: A summary of the discussion at the 1997 AAA/FASB conference. Accounting Horizons, 12, 271–282.

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (1997). Disclosure of accounting policies for derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments and disclosure of quantitative and qualitative information about market risk inherent in derivative financial instruments, other financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. Final Rule (Amendment to Section 210.4-08(n) of Regulation S-X and to Item 310 of Regulation S-B). Release Nos. 33-7386; 34-38223; IC-22487; FR-48; International Series No. 1047; File No. S7-35-95. Washington, D.C.

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2003). Financial reporting release no. 72. Commission guidance regarding management’s discussion and analysis for financial condition and results of operations. Securities Act Release No. 33-8350. Washington, D.C.

Shalen, C. (1993). Volume, volatility, and the dispersion of beliefs. Review of Financial Studies, 6, 405–434.CrossRef

Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285.CrossRef

Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980). Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. In R. Schwing & W. Albers, Jr. (Eds.), Societal risk Assessment: How safe is safe enough? (pp. 181–214). New York: Plenum Press.

Wong, M. H. F. (2000). The association between SFAS No. 119 derivatives disclosures and the foreign exchange risk exposure of manufacturing firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 387–417.CrossRef

You, H., & Zhang, X. (2009). Financial reporting complexity and investor under reaction to 10-K information. Review of Accounting Studies, 14, 559–586.CrossRef

Titel: Textual risk disclosures and investors’ risk perceptions
verfasst von: Todd Kravet
Volkan Muslu
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2013
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Review of Accounting Studies / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1380-6653
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7136
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-013-9228-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

Do sell-side analysts exhibit differential target price forecasting ability?

Target’s earnings quality and bidders’ takeover decisions

Stock option grant vesting terms: economic and financial reporting determinants

Management forecast credibility and underreaction to news

A theory of voluntary disclosure and cost of capital

Dynamic risk, accounting-based valuation and firm fundamentals