skip to main content
10.1145/1054972.1055039acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Toward subtle intimate interfaces for mobile devices using an EMG controller

Published:02 April 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Using a mobile device in a social context should not cause embarrassment and disruption to the immediate environment. Interaction with mobile and wearable devices needs to be subtle, discreet and unobtrusive. Therefore, we promote the idea of "intimate interfaces": discrete interfaces that allow control of mobile devices through subtle gestures in order to gain social acceptance. To achieve this goal, we present an electromyogram (EMG) based wearable input device which recognizes isometric muscular activity: activity related to very subtle or no movement at all. In the online experiment reported, the EMG device, worn on an armband around the bicep, was able to reliably recognize a motionless gesture without calibration or training across users with different muscle volumes. Hence, EMG-based input devices can provide an effective solution for designing mobile interfaces that are subtle and intimate, and therefore socially acceptable.

References

  1. Ängeslevä, J., O'Modhrain, S., Oakley, I., Hughes, S. Body Mnemonics. Proc. Physical Interaction (PI03) - Workshop on Real World User Interfaces, a workshop at the Mobile HCI Conference 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barreto, A., Scargle, S., Adjouadi, M. Hands-off human-computer interfaces for individuals with severe motor disabilities. Proc. HCI International 1999, 970--974.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. De Luca, C.J. Physiology and Mathematics of Myoelectric Signals. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. BME-26, No.6, June 1979.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. De Luca, C.J. Surface Electromyography: Detection and Recording. Whitepaper, DelSys Inc., 2002. http://www.delsys.com/library/papers/SEMGintro.pdf]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. DeVaul, R., Sung, M., Gips, J., Pentland, A. MIThril 2003: Applications and Architecture. Proc the 7th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dubost, G., Tanaka, A. A Wireless, Networked-based Biosensor Interface for Music. Proc. International Computer Music Conference, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fistre, J., Tanaka, A. Real Time EMG Gesture Recognition for Consumer Electronics Device Control. Presented at Sony CSL Paris Open House 10/2002, http://www.csl.sony.fr/~atau/gesture/.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fitzmaurice. G., Ishii, H., and Buxton, W. A. S. Laying the Foundations for Graspable User Interfaces. Proceedings of CHI'95, pp 422--449.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Geelhoed, E., Falahee, M., Latham, K. Safety and Comfort of Eyeglass Displays. Proc. of the 2nd international symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, 2000, p.236--247.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Harrison, B.L., Fishkin, K.P., Gujar, A., Mochon, C., and Want, R. Squeeze me, hold me, tilt me! An exploration of manipulative user interfaces. Proc CHI 1998, ACM Press (1998).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hart, S. G., Wickens C. Workload Assesment and Prediction. In Booher, H.R., ed. MANPRINT, an approach to system integration, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1990, pp 182--188.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Headon, R., Coulouris, G. Supporting Gestural Input for Users on the Move. Proc IEE Eurowearable '03, pp 107--112.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Healy, J., Picard, R. Digital Processing of Affective Signals. Proc. ICASSP (1998).]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hefftner, G., Zucchini, W., Jaros, G.G. The Electromyogram (EMG) as a Control Signal for Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation-Part I: Autoregressive Modeling as a Means of EMG Signature Discrimination. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 35, pp. 230--236, April 1988.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hinckley, K., Pierce, J., Sinclair, M., Horvitz, E. Sensing techniques for mobile interaction. Proc UIST 2000, ACM Press (2000).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. http://www.bodymedia.com/]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. http://www.eyetap.org/]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. http://www.microopticalcorp.com/]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. Tangible bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits, and Atoms. Proceedings of CHI'97, pp 234--241.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kasai, I., Tanijiri, Y., Endo, T., Ueda, H. A Forgettable near Eye Display. Proc Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC'00).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Knapp, B., Lusted, H. A Bioelectric Controller for Computer Music Applications. Computer Music Journal, vol. 14, No. 1, Spring 1990.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Lumsden, J., Brewster, S. A paradigm shift: alternative interaction techniques for use with mobile & wearable devices. Proc. of the 13th Annual IBM Centers for Advanced Studies Conference CASCON'2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Oakley, I., Angesleva, J., Hughes, S., O'Modhrain, S. Tilt and Feel: Scrolling with Vibrotactile Display. Proc EuroHaptics'04.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Pirhonen, A., Brewster, S.A., Holguin, C. Gestural and Audio Metaphors as a Means of Control in Mobile Devices. Proc. CHI 2002, ACM Press 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Poupyrev, I., Maruyama, S., Rekimoto, J. Ambient touch: designing tactile interfaces for handheld devices. Proc UIST 2002, ACM Press (2002), pp 51--60.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Putnam, W., Knapp, B. The Use of the Electromyogram in a Man-Machine Interface. Proc. of the Virtual Reality and Persons With Disabilities Conference, June 1993.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rekimoto, J. GestureWrist and GesturePad: Unobtrusive Wearable Interaction Devices. Proc. 5th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rekimoto, J. Tilting Operations for Small Screen Interfaces. Proc. UIST'96, 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Schalk, G., McFarland, D. J., Hinterberger, T., Birbaumer, N., Wolpaw, J. R. BCI2000: A general-purpose brain-computer interface (bci) system. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 51(6):1034--1043, 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Tanaka A., Knapp B. Multimodal Interaction in Music Using the Electromyogram and Relative Position Sensing. Proc NIME'02.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Trejo, L.J. Wheeler, K.R. Jorgensen, C.C. Rosipal, R. Clanton, S.T. Matthews, B. Hibbs, A.D. Matthews, R. Krupka, M. Multimodal Neuroelectric Interface Development. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, June 2003, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp 199--203.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Wheeler, K.R., Jorgensen, C.C. Gestures as Input: Neuroelectric Joysticks and Keyboards. IEEE Pervasive Computing, April-June 2003 (Vol. 2, No. 2).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Toward subtle intimate interfaces for mobile devices using an EMG controller

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2005
        928 pages
        ISBN:1581139985
        DOI:10.1145/1054972

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 April 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '05 Paper Acceptance Rate93of372submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader