Nathan Bos
Judith Olson
N. Sadat Shami
ABSTRACT
This experimental study looks at how relocation affected the collaboration patterns of partially-distributed work groups. Partially distributed teams have part of their membership together in one location and part joining at a distance. These teams have some characteristics of collocated teams, some of distributed (virtual) teams, and some dynamics that are unique. Previous experiments have shown that these teams are vulnerable to in-groups forming between the collocated and distributed members. In this study we switched the locations of some of the members about halfway through the experiment to see what effect it would have on these ingroups. People who changed from being isolated 'telecommuters' to collocators very quickly formed new collaborative relationships. People who were moved out of a collocated room had more trouble adjusting, and tried unsuccessfully to maintain previous ties. Overall, collocation was a more powerful determiner of collaboration patterns than previous relationships. Implications and future research are discussed.
- Teasley, S., Covi, L., Krishnan, M.S., & Olson, J. S. (2000) How does radical collocation help a team succeed? Proceedings of CSCW 2000. pp. 339--346. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G. M., and Wright, Z. (2002). The effect of four communication channels on trust development. Proceedings of CHI 2002, pp 135-- 140. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rocco, E. (1998). Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact, Proceedings of CHI 1998, pp 496--502. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilson, J. M., Kiesler, S., Dirks, K., & Reagans, R. (in review). All in due time: development of trust in electronic and face to face groups.Google Scholar
- Zheng, J., Veinott, E., Bos, N.D., Olson, J.S., & Olson, G.M. (2002). Trust without touch: Jumpstarting long-distance trust with initial social activities. In Proceedings of CHI 2002. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olson, G. M., and Olson, J. S. (2000) Distance Matters. Human Computer Interaction. 15, 139--179. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Armstrong & Cole (2002) Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In Distributed work: New ways of working across distance using technology (P. Hinds & S. Kiesler, Eds.), MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jarvenpaa, S., and Leidner, D. (1999) Commuication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791--815. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gibson C. & Cohen, S. (2003). Virtual teams that Work. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Herbsleb, J.D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T.A., & Grinter, R.E. (2000). Distance dependencies, and delay in global collaboration. In Proceedings of CSCW 2000 (pp. 319--328). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cramton, C. D. (2002) Attribution in distributed work groups. In P.J. Hinds and S. Kiesler (Eds.) Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 191--212.Google Scholar
- Fussell, S.R., Kiesler, S., Setlock, L.D., & Scupelli, P. (2004). Effects of instant messaging on the management of multiple project trajectories. In Proceedings of CHI 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bos, N.D., Shami, N.S., Olson, J.S., Cheshin, A.& Nan, N. (2004). In-group/ out-group effects in distributed teams: an experimental simulation. In Proceedings of CSCW 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shami, N.S., Bos, N.D., Wright, Z., Hoch, S., Kuan, K.Y., Olson, J.S., Olson, G.M. (2004). An experimental simulation of multi-site software development. In Proceedings of IBM Center for Advanced Studies Conference (CASCON), October 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brown, R. (2000) "Social Identity Theory: past achievements, current problems, and future challenges." European Journal of Social Psychology 30, 745--77Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Traveling blues: the effect of relocation on partially distributed teams
Recommendations
In-group/out-group effects in distributed teams: an experimental simulation
CSCW '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative workModern workplaces often bring together virtual teams where some members are collocated, and some participate remotely. We are using a simulation game to study collaborations of 10-person groups, with five collocated members and five isolates (simulated '...
Collocation blindness in partially distributed groups: is there a downside to being collocated?
CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsUnder what circumstances might a group member be better off as a long-distance participant rather than collocated? We ran a set of experiments to study how partially-distributed groups collaborate when skill sets are unequally distributed. Partially ...
Facilitating Collaboration: Potential Synergies Between Collaboration Engineering and Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
This article explores the potential synergy between computer-supported collaborative learning CSCL and collaboration engineering CE. Both areas pursue the goal of understanding how to manage interactions in collaborative groups to achieve shared ...
Comments