James D. Herbsleb
Audris Mockus
Thomas A. Finholt
Rebecca E. Grinter
ABSTRACT
Collaborations over distance must contend with the loss of the rich, subtle interactions that co-located teams use to coordinate their work. Previous research has suggested that one consequence of this loss is that cross-site work will take longer than comparable single-site work. We use both survey data and data from the change management system to measure the extent of delay in a multi-site software development organization. We also measure site interdependence, differences in same-site and cross-site communication patterns, and analyze the relationship of these variables to delay. Our results show a significant relationship between delay in cross-site work and the degree to which remote colleagues are perceived to help out when workloads are heavy. This result is particularly troubling in light of the finding that workers generally believed they were as helpful to their remote colleagues as to their local colleagues. We discuss implications of our findings for collaboration technology for distributed organizations.
- 1.Abel,M.J.,Experiences in an Exploratory Distributed Organization in Intellectual Teamwork:Social Foundations of Cooperative Work,J.Galegher,R.E. Kraut,and C.Egido,Editors.1990,Lawrence Erlbaum Associates:Hillsdale,New Jersey.489-510.]] Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.Ackerman,M.S.and C.Halverson.Considering an Organization's Memory.In Computer Supported Collaborative Work.1998.Seattle,WA:ACM Press 39- 48.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.Allen T.J.,Managing the Flow of Technology.1977, Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.]]Google Scholar
- 4.Bellotti,V.and S.Bly.Walking Away from the Desktop Computer:Distributed Collaboration and Mobility in a Product Design Team.In ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work CSCW '96. 1996.Cambridge,MA:New York,N.Y.:ACM Press 209-218.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.Boyer,D.G.,et al.Virtual Community Presence Awareness.In CSCW '98 Workshop on Designing Virtual Communities for Work.1999.Seattle,WA.]]Google Scholar
- 6.Cadiz,J.J.,et al.,The Awareness Monitor:A Coordination Tool for Asynchronous Distributed Work Teams.Unpublished manuscript.Carnegie Mellon University,1999.]]Google Scholar
- 7.Churchill,E.F.and S.Bly.It's all in the words: Supporting work activities with lightweight tools.in GROUP '99.1999.Phoenix,AZ 40-49.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Cusumano,M.A.and D.B.Yoffie,Competing on Internet Time.1998,New York NY:The Free Press.]]Google Scholar
- 9.Dourish P.and S.Bly.Portholes:Supporting Awareness in a Distributed Work Group.In ACM CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.1992.Monterey,CA.:ACM Press 541-547.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.Eick,S.G.,et al.Does Code Decay?Assessing the Evidence from Change Management Data.IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering,in press.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Fish,R.S.,et al.Evaluating Video as a Technology for Informal Communication.in CHI'92.1992.Monterey, CA:ACM 37-48.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Fussell,S.R.,et al.Coordination overload and team performance:Effects of team communication strategies. in Computer Supported Cooperative Work.1998. Seattle,WA:ACM Press 275-284.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.Galbraith,J.,Organizational Design.1977,Reading MA:Addison-Wesley.]]Google Scholar
- 14.Grinter,R.E.Recomposition:Putting It All Back Together Again.in ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '98).1998. Seattle,Washington:ACM Press.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.Grinter,R.E.,J.D.Herbsleb,and D.E.Perry.The Geography of Coordination:Dealing with Distance in R&D Work.In GROUP '99.1999.Phoenix,AZ.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.Heath,C.and P.Luff.Collaborative Activity and Technological Design:Task Coordination in London Underground Control Rooms.In ECSCW '91.1991. Amsterdam 65-80.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.Herbsleb,J.D.and R.E.Grinter.Splitting the Organization and Integrating the Code:Conway 's Law Revisited.In 21st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 99).1999.Los Angeles CA:ACM Press 85-95.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.Hindus,D.et al.Thunderwire:A field study of an audio-only media space.In Computer Supported Cooperative Work.1996.Boston MA:ACM Press 238- 247.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.Hughes,J.A.D.Randall,and D.Shapiro.From Ethnographic Record to System Design:Some Experiences from the Field.Computer Supported Cooperative Work:An International Journal 1,3,1993, 123-141.]]Google Scholar
- 20.Kraut,R.E.,C.Egido,and J.Galegher,Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaborations,in Intellectual Teamwork:Social Foundations of Cooperative Work,J.Galegher,R.E. Kraut,and C.Egido,Editors.1990,Lawrence Erlbaum Associates:Hillsdale,New Jersey.149-172.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.Kraut,R.E.and L.A.Streeter.Coordination in Software Development.Communications of the ACM 38,3,1995,69-81.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22.Mockus,A.,et al.,On Measurement and Analysis of Software Changes.Bell Labs Technical Report No. BL0113590-990401-06TM,Murray Hill,NJ,]]Google Scholar
- 23.Obata,A.and K.Sasaki.OfficeWalker:A virtual visiting system based on proxemics.in Computer Supported Cooperative Work.1998.Seattle,WA 1-10.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 24.Olson G.M.and J.S.Olson.Distance Matters.Human- Computer Interaction,in press.]]Google Scholar
- 25.Olson J.S.and S.Teasley.Groupware in the Wild: Lessons Learned from a Year of Virtual Collocation.In Computer Supported Cooperative Work.1996. Cambridge,MA:New York,N.Y.:ACM Press 419-427.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 26.Palen,L.Social,individual,and technological issues for groupware calendar systems.In CHI '99.1999. Pittsburgh,PA.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 27.Robertson,T.Cooperative Work and Lived Cognition: A Taxonomy of Embodied Interaction.In Fifth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW '97.1997.Lancaster,UK: Dordrecht,Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers 205-220.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 28.Slatalla,M.,The office meeting that never ends.New York Times,Sept.23,1999.]]Google Scholar
- 29.Suchman L.A.Office Procedure as Practical Action: Models of Work and System Design.ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 1,4,1983,320-328.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 30.Tellioglu H.and I.Wagner.Negotiating Boundaries: Configuration Management in Software Development Teams.Computer Supported Cooperative Work:The Journal of Collaborative Computing 6,4,1997,251- 274.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration
Recommendations
An empirical study of global software development: distance and speed
ICSE '01: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software EngineeringGlobal software development is rapidly becoming the norm for technology companies. Previous qualitative research suggests that multi-site development may increase development cycle time. We use both survey data and data from the source code change ...
An Empirical Study of Speed and Communication in Globally Distributed Software Development
Global software development is rapidly becoming the norm for technology companies. Previous qualitative research suggests that distributed development may increase development cycle time for individual work items (modification requests). We use both ...
Emotion understanding and performance during computer-supported collaboration
Individuals collaborating around and through computers benefit from receiving information that helps them understand one another, which is often termed awareness. This article explores what collaborators understand about each other's emotions and the ...
Comments