skip to main content
10.1145/1062689.1062739acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobihocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Efficient gathering of correlated data in sensor networks

Published:25 May 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we design techniques that exploit data correlations in sensor data to minimize communication costs (and hence, energy costs) incurred during data gathering in a sensor network. Our proposed approach is to select a small subset of sensor nodes that may be sufficient to reconstruct data for the entire sensor network. Then, during data gathering only the selected sensors need to be involved in communication. The selected set of sensors must also be connected, since they need to relay data to the data-gathering node. We define the problem of selecting such a set of sensors as the connected correlation-dominating set problem, and formulate it in terms of an appropriately defined correlation structure that captures general data correlations in a sensor network.We develop a set of energy-efficient distributed algorithms and competitive centralized heuristics to select a connected correlation-dominating set of small size. The designed distributed algorithms can be implemented in an asynchronous communication model, and can tolerate message losses. We also design an exponential (but non-exhaustive) centralized approximation algorithm that returns a solution within O(log n) of the optimal size. Based on the approximation algorithm, we design a class of efficient centralized heuristics that are empirically shown to return near-optimal solutions. Simulation results over randomly generated sensor networks with both artificially and naturally generated data sets demonstrate the efficiency of the designed algorithms and the viability of our technique -- even in dynamic conditions.

References

  1. K. M. Alzoubi, P.-J. Wan, and O. Frieder. Message-optimal connected dominating sets in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. Berman and V. Ramaiyer. Improved approximation algorithms for the steiner tree problem. J. Algorithms, 17, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Cerpa and D. Estrin. Ascent: Adaptive self-configuring sensor networks topologies. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. B. Chen, K. Jamieson, H. Balakrishnan, and R. Morris. Span: An energy-efficient coordination algorithm for topology maintenance in ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Chen and A. Liestman. Approximating minimum size weakly-connected dominating sets for clustering mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Chou, D. Petrovic, and K. Ramchandran. A distributed and adaptive signal processing approach to reducing energy consumption in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. T. Cormen, C. Lieserson, R. Rivest, and C. Stein. Introduction to Algorithms. McGraw Hill, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Cristescu, B. Beferull-Lozano, and M. Vetterli. On network correlated data gathering. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. R. Cristescu and M. Vetterli. Power efficient gathering of correlated data: optimization, NP-completeness and heuristics. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev., 7(3):31--32, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Culler et al. TinyOS. http://www.tinyos.net, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. Das, R. Sivakumar, and V. Bhargavan. Routing in ad hoc networks using a spine. In Proceedings of the Intl. Conf. on Computer Communications and Networks (IC3N), 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. B. Deb, S. Bhatnagar, and B. Nath. Multi-resolution state retrieval in sensor networks. In Proceedings of Intl.\ Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. D. Dubhashi, A. Mei, A. Panconesi, J. Radhakrishnan, and A. Srinivasan. Fast distributed algorithms for (weakly) connected dominating sets and linear-size skeletons. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Enachescu, A. Goel, R. Govindan, and R. Motwani. Scale free aggregation in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Algorithmic Aspects of Wireless Sensor Networks (Algosensors), 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. Goel and D. Estrin. Simultaneous optimization for concave costs: single sink aggregation or single source buy-at-bulk. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Guha and S. Khuller. Approximation algorithms for connected dominating sets. Algorithmica, 20(4), 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. H. Gupta. Selection of views to materialize in a data warehouse. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Database Theory, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. H. Gupta. Selection and Maintenance of Materialized Views in a Data Warehouse. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, D. E. Culler, and K. S. J. Pister. System architecture directions for networked sensors. In Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pages 93--104, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. M. Kay. Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Detection Theory, Vol. II. Prentice-Hall, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Laouiti, A. Qayyum, and L. Viennot. Multipoint relaying: An efficient technique for flooding in mobile wireless networks. In Proc. of the Hawaii Intl. Conf. on System Sciences, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. D. Marco, E. Duarte-Melo, M. Liu, and D. L. Neuhoff. On the many-to-one transport capacity of a dense wireless sensor network and the compressibility of its data. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. National Climatic Data Center. www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/res40.pl?page=gsod.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. S. Pattem, B. Krishnamachari, and R. Govindan. The impact of spatial correlation on routing with compression in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. Scaglione and S. D. Servetto. On the interdependence of routing and data compression in multi-hop sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. V. Shnayder, M. Hempstead, B. Chen, G. W. Allen, and M. Welsh. Simulating the power consumption of large-scale sensor network applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. P. von Rickenbach and R. Wattenhofer. Gathering correlated data in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the joint workshop on Foundations of mobile computing (DIALM-POMC), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. J. Wu and F. Dai. Broadcasting in ad hoc networks based on self-pruning. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. J. Wu and H. Li. A dominating-set-based routing scheme in ad hoc wireless networks. Telecommunication Systems Journal, 3, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Y. Xu, J. S. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. Geography-informed energy conservation for ad hoc routing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. F. Ye, G. Zhong, J. Cheng, S. Lu, and L. Zhang. PEAS: A robust energy conserving protocol for long-lived sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. S. Yoon and C. Shahabi. Exploiting spatial correlation towards an energy efficient clustered aggregation technique (cag). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Efficient gathering of correlated data in sensor networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiHoc '05: Proceedings of the 6th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing
      May 2005
      470 pages
      ISBN:1595930043
      DOI:10.1145/1062689

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 May 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate296of1,843submissions,16%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader