skip to main content
10.1145/1065579.1065678acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

RADAR: RET-aware detailed routing using fast lithography simulations

Published:13 June 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper attempts to reconcile the growing interdependency between nanometer lithography and physical design. We first introduce the concept of lithography hotspots and the edge placement error (EPE) map to measure the overall printability and manufacturing effort. We then adapt fast lithography simulation models to generate EPE map. Guided by EPE map, we develop effective RET-aware detailed routing (RADAR) techniques that can handle full-chip capacity to enhance the overall printability while maintaining other design closure. RADAR is implemented in an industry strength detailed router, and tested using some 65nm designs. Our experimental results show that we can achieve up to 40% EPE reduction with reasonable CPU time.

References

  1. L. W. Liebmann, "Layout impact of resolution enhancement techniques: impediment or opportunity?", Int. Symp. on Physical Design, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. F. M. Schellenberg, "Resolution enhancement technology: the past, the present and extension for the future". SPIE Microlithography Symposium, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Gupta and A. B. Kahng, "Manufacturing-aware physical design," ICCAD, pp. 681--687, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H. K.-S. Leung, "Advanced routing in changing technology landscape," Int. Symp. on Physical Design, pp. 118--121, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. B. Kahng, "Research directions for coevolution of rules and routers," in Proc. Int. Symp. on Physical Design, pp. 122--125, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Scheffer, "Physical CAD changes to incorporate design for lithography and manufacturability," ASPDAC, Jan. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Lavin, F.-K. Luen, and G. Northrop, "Backend CAD flows for 'Restrictive Design Rules'", ICCAD, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. PROLITH (version 8.0), KLA-Tencor Corporation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. SOLID-CTM (version 6.4.1), Sigma-C Software.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. L.-D. Huang and D. F. Wong, "Optical proximity correction (OPC)-friendly maze routing," DAC, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y.C. Pati, A.A. Ghazanfarian, and R.F. Pease, "Exploiting structure in fast aerial image computation for IC patterns", IEEE Trans. Semi. Mfg., Feb 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Stirniman and M. Rieger, "Fast proximity correction with zone sampling", in Proc. SPIE Symposium on Microlithography, vol. 2197, pp 294--301, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. N. B. Cobb, Fast Optical and process Proximity Correction Algorithms for Integrated Circuit Manufacturing, Ph.D. Thesis, UC Berkeley, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Blast-Fusion, Magma Design Automation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. RADAR: RET-aware detailed routing using fast lithography simulations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DAC '05: Proceedings of the 42nd annual Design Automation Conference
      June 2005
      984 pages
      ISBN:1595930582
      DOI:10.1145/1065579

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 June 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      DAC '24
      61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
      June 23 - 27, 2024
      San Francisco , CA , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader