skip to main content
10.1145/1095034.1095057acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Bimanual and unimanual image alignment: an evaluation of mouse-based techniques

Published:23 October 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present an evaluation of three mouse-based techniques for aligning digital images. We investigate the physical image alignment task and discuss the implications for interacting with virtual images. In a formal evaluation we show that a symmetric bimanual technique outperforms an asymmetric bimanual technique which in turn outperforms a unimanual technique. We show that even after mode switching times are removed, the symmetric technique outperforms the single mouse technique. Subjects also exhibited more parallel interaction using the symmetric technique than when using the asymmetric technique.

References

  1. Ravin Balakrishnan and Ken Hinckley. Symmetric bimanual interaction. In CHI 2000 Proceedings, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. Novel interaction techniques for overlapping windows. In UIST 2001 Proceedings, pages 153--154. ACM, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. W. Buxton and B. Myers. A study in two-handed input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 321--326. ACM Press, 1986.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. House Internet Services B.V. PTgui. http://www.ptgui.com/.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Didier Casalta, Yves Guiard, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. Evaluating two-handed input techniques: Rectangle editing and navigation. ACM CHI'99 Conference (Extended Abstracts), pages 236--237, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Stephane Chatty. Extending a graphical toolkit for two-handed interaction. In UIST'94 Proceedings, pages 195--204, 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Stephane Chatty. Issues and experience in designing two-handed interaction. In CHI'94 Proceedings, 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chia-Yen Chen and Reinhard Klette. Image stitching - comparisons and new techniques. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 1689, pages 615--622. Springer-Verlag GmbH, Jan 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. PanaVue Company. Panavue image assembler. http://www.panavue.com/.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. George Fitzmaurice, Hiroshi Ishii, and William Buxton. Bricks: Laying the foundations for graspable user interfaces. In CHI'95 Proceedings, 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yves Guiard. Asymmetric division of labour in human skilled bimanual action: The kinematic chain as a model. Journal of Motor Behaviour, pages 486--517, 1987.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ken Hinckley, Mary Czerwinski, and Mike Sinclair. Interaction and modeling techniques for desktop two-handed input. In UIST'98 Proceedings, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Paul Kabbash, William Buxton, and Abigail Sellen. Two-handed input in a compound task. In CHI'94 Proceedings, 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Russell Kruger, Sheelagh Carpendale, Stacey D. Scott, and Anthony Tang. Fluid integration of rotation and translation. In CHI'05 Proceedings, 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gordon Kurtenbach, George Fitzmaurice, Thomas Baudel, and Bill Buxton. The design of a GUI paradigm based on tablets, two-hands and transparency. In CHI'97 Proceedings, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Celine Latulipe. Symmetric interaction in the user interface. In Companion Proceedings of UIST 2004, pages 63--66, 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Andrea Leganchuk, Shumin Zhai, and William Buxton. Manual and cognitive benefits of two-handed input. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 5(4):326--359, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ignacio Llamas, Byungmoon Kim, Joshua Gargus, Jarek Rossignac, and Chris D. Shaw. Twister: a space-warp operator for the two-handed editing of 3D shapes. ACM Trans. Graph., 22(3):663--668, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. I. Scott MacKenzie and Yves Guiard. The two-handed desktop interface: are we there yet? In CHI '01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computer systems, pages 351--352. ACM Press, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Russell Owen, Gordon Kurtenbach, George Fitzmaurice, Thomas Baudel, and Bill Buxton. When it gets more difficult, use both hands - exploring bimanual curve manipulation. In GI 2005 Proceedings, 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Roope Raisamo and Kari-Jouko Raiha. Techniques for aligning objects in drawing programs. In UIST'96 Proceedings, 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Chris Shaw and Mark Green. THRED: A two-handed design system. Multimedia Systems, 5:126--139, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rick Szeliski. Image alignment and stitching. Technical Report MSR-TR-2004-92, Microsoft Research, 2004. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cyy/courses/vfx/papers/Szeliski2005IAS.pdf.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Bimanual and unimanual image alignment: an evaluation of mouse-based techniques

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '05: Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
      October 2005
      270 pages
      ISBN:1595932712
      DOI:10.1145/1095034

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 October 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      UIST '05 Paper Acceptance Rate31of159submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader