skip to main content
10.1145/1124772.1124939acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Attention funnel: omnidirectional 3D cursor for mobile augmented reality platforms

Published:22 April 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

The attention funnel is a general purpose AR interface technique that interactively guides the attention of a user to any object, person, or place in space. The technique utilizes dynamic perceptual affordances to draw user attention "down" the funnel to the target location. Attention funnel can be used to cue objects completely out of sight including objects behind the user, or occluded by other objects or walls.An experiment evaluating user performance with the attention funnel and other conventional AR attention directing techniques found that the attention funnel increased the consistency of the user's search by 65%, increased search speed by 22%, and decreased mental workload by 18%. The attention funnel has potential applicability as a general 3D cursor or cue in a wide array of spatially enabled mobile and AR systems, and for applications where systems can support users in visual search, object awareness, and emergency warning in indoor and outdoor spaces.

References

  1. Azuma, R. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4): p. 355 -- 385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Blauert, J. (1983). Spatial hearing: the psychoacoutics of human sound localization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonanni, L., Lee, C. and Selker, T. (2005). Attention-based design of augmented reality interfaces. In Proc. ACM CHI 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Burgoon, J., Buller, D. and Woodall, W. (1996). Nonverbal communication: the unspoken dialogue. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Feiner, S., MacIntyre, B. and Seligmann, D. (1993). Knowledge-baed augmented reality. Communication of the ACM, 36(7): p. 52 -- 62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Foxlin, E., Harrington, M. and Pfeifer, G. (1998). Constellation: a wide-range wireless motion-tracking system for augmented reality and virtual set applications. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Haehnel, D., Burgard, W., Fox, D., Fishkin, K. and Philipose, M. (2004). Mapping and localization with RFID technology. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hancock, P. and Meshkati, N. (1988). Human mental workload. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hart, S. and Staveland, L. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research, in Human Mental Workload, Hancock, P. and Meshkati, N., Editors. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p. 139 -- 183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hearn, D. and Baker, M.P. (1996). Computer Graphics, C Version. Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hochberg, J. (1986). Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays, in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Vol. 1, Boff, K., Kaufman, L.T. and Thomas, J., Editors. Wiley, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H. and Collins, J. (2004). Global positioning system: theory and practice. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Horvitz, E., Kadie, C., Paek, T. and Hovel, D. (2003). Models of attention in computing and communication: from principles to applications. Communication of the ACM, 46(3): p. 52--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Johnson, A. and Proctor, R.W. (2004). Attention: theory and practice. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kato, H. and Billinghurst, M. (1999). Marker tracking and HMD Calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system. In Proc. 2nd International Workshop on Augmented Reality. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Khan, A., Matejka, J., Fitzmaurice, G. and Kurtenbach, G. (2005). Spotlight: directing users' attention on large display. In Proc. ACM CHI 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mann, S. (2000). Telepointer: Hands-Free Completely Self Contained Wearable Visual Augmented Reality without Headwear and without any Infrastructural Reliance. In Proc. Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. McCrickard, D. and Chewar, C. (2003). Attentive user interface: attuning notification design to user goals and attention costs. Communication of the ACM, 46(3): p. 67--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Moran, T.P. and Dourish, P. (2001,). Introduction to This Special Issue on Context-Aware Computing. Human-Computer Interaction, 16: p. 87--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Owen, C., Tang, A. and Xiao, F. (2003). ImageTclAR: a blended script and compiled code development system for augmented reality. In Proc. STARS2003, The International Workshop on Software Technology for Augmented Reality Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Redelmeier, D.A. and Tibshirani, R.J. (1997). Association between Cellular Telephone Calls and Motor Vehicle Collisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 336(7): p. 453--458.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Roel, V. (2002). Designing attentive interfaces. In Proc. Symposium on Eye Tracking Reasearch & Applications. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Schmalstieg, D. and Wagner, D. (2005). A handheld augmented reality museum guide. In Proc. IADIS International Conference on Mobile Learning 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Shiffrin, R. (1979). Visual processing capacity and attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5: p. 522--526.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Strayer, D.L. and A., J.W. (2001). Driven to distraction: dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychological Science, 12(6): p. 462--466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. van der Heijden, A.H.C. (1992). Selective attention in vision. Routledge, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. van der Heijden, A.H.C. (2003). Attention in vision: perception, communication, and action. Psychology Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Wagner, D., Pintaric, T., Ledermann, F. and Schmalstieg, D. (2005). Towards massively multi-user augmented reality on handheld devices. In Proc. Third International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wagner, D. and Schmalstieg, D. (2003). First steps towards handheld augmented reality. In Proc. 7th Internation Symposium on Wearable Computers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Attention funnel: omnidirectional 3D cursor for mobile augmented reality platforms

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2006
      1353 pages
      ISBN:1595933727
      DOI:10.1145/1124772

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 April 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader