skip to main content
10.1145/1124772.1124951acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Comparing remote gesture technologies for supporting collaborative physical tasks

Published:22 April 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

The design of remote gesturing technologies is an area of growing interest. Current technologies have taken differing approaches to the representation of remote gesture. It is not clear which approach has the most benefit to task performance. This study therefore compared performance in a collaborative physical (assembly) task using remote gesture systems constructed with combinations of three different gesture formats (unmediated hands only, hands and sketch and digital sketch only) and two different gesture output locations (direct projection into a worker's task space or on an external monitor). Results indicated that gesturing with an unmediated representation of the hands leads to faster performance with no loss of accuracy. Comparison of gesture output locations did not find a significant difference between projecting gestures and presenting them on external monitors. These results are discussed in relation to theories of conversational grounding and the design of technologies from a 'mixed ecologies' perspective.

References

  1. Argyle, M. Bodily Communication. (1988). Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bekker, M. M., Olson, J. S., & Olson, G. M. Analysis of gestures in face-to-face design teams provides guidance for how to use groupware in design. In Proceedings of DIS 95. ACM Press. (1995). 157--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chapanis, A., Ochsman, R. B., Parrish, R. N., &Weeks, G. D. Studies in interactive communication: I. The effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during cooperative problem-solving. Human Factors, 14(6), (1972). 487--509.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, H. H. Using language. (1996). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory & Language, 50(1), (2004). 62--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1), (1986). 1--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S.E. Grounding in Communication. In L.B. Resnick, R.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition, (1991). 127--149. Washington, DC: APA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fraser, M. Working with Objects in Collaborative Environments. (2001) Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fussell, S. R., Setlock, L. D., Yang, J., Ou, J., Mauer, E. M., & Kramer, A. Gestures over video streams to support remote collaboration on physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, (2004). 273--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fussell, S.R., Kraut, R.E., & Siegel, J. Coordination of communication: Effects of shared visual context on collaborative work. Proceedings of CSCW 2000, ACM Press (2000). 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fussell, S.R., Setlock, L.D., & Parker, E.M. Where do helpers look? Gaze targets during collaborative physical tasks. In Proceedings of CHI 2003 (Extended Abstracts), ACM Press (2003).768--769. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gergle, D., Kraut, R.E., & Fussell, S.R. Action as language in a shared visual space. Proceedings of CSCW 2004. ACM Press (2004). 487--496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Heath, C. C. and Luff P. K. Convergent activities: collaborative work and multimedia technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms, in D. Middleton and Y. Engestrom (eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work: Distributed Cognition in the Workplace. Cambridge University Press (1996). 96--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Karsenty, L. Cooperative work and shared visual context: An empirical study of comprehension problems and in side-by-side and remote help dialogues. Human-Computer Interaction, 14(3), (1999). 283--315. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kirk, D. S. & Stanton Fraser, D. The Effects of Remote Gesturing on Distance Instruction. In Proceedings of CSCL 2005. LEA (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kirk, D., Crabtree, A. & Rodden, T. Ways of the Hands. In Proceedings of ECSCW 2005. Kluwer (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., & Siegel, J. Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human Computer Interaction, 18(1), (2003). 13-49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kraut, R. E., Gergle, D., & Fussell, S. R. The use of visual information in shared visual spaces: Informing the development of virtual co-presence. In Proceedings of CSCW 2002, ACM Press. (2002). 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kraut, R. E., Miller, M. D., & Siegel, J. Collaboration in performance of physical tasks: Effects on outcomes and communication. Proceedings of CSCW 1996 ACM Press (1996). 57--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kuzuoka, H. Spatial workspace collaboration: A Sharedview video support system for remote collaboration capability. Proceedings of CHI'92 ACM Press (1992). 533--540. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kuzuoka, H., Kosaka, J., Yamazaki, K., Suga, Y., Yamazaki, A., Luff, P., & Heath, C. Mediating Dual Ecologies. Proceedings of CSCW 2004 ACM Press (2004). 477--486). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kuzuoka, H., Kosuge, T., & Tanaka, K. GestureCam: A video communication system for sympathetic remote collaboration. Proceedings of CSCW 1994 ACM Press (1994) 35--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Kuzuoka, H., Oyama, S., Yamazaki, K., Suzuki, K., & Mitsuishi, M. GestureMan: A mobile robot that embodies a remote instructor's actions. Proceedings of CSCW 2000 ACM Press (2000). 155--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Luff, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Hindmarsh, J., Yamazaki, K., and Oyama, S., Fractured ecologies: creating environments for collaboration, Special Issue of the HCI Journal: 'Talking About Things: Mediated Conversation about Objects', 18, 1 & 2, (2003). 51--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. McNeill, D. Hand and Mind. What gestures reveal about thought. (1996) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ou, J., Fussell, S. R., Chen, X., Setlock, L. D., & Yang, J. Gestural communication over video stream: Supporting multimodal interaction for remote collaborative physical tasks. In Proceedings of ICMI 2003, (2003) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ou, J., Min, L., Yang, J. and Fussell, S. R. Effects of Task Properties, Partner Actions and Message Content on Eye Gaze Patterns in a Collaborative Task. In Proceedings of CHI 2005. ACM Press (2005). 231 -- 240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M. & Chen, Y. (1996) Gesture, Speech and Lexical Access: The Role of Lexical Movements in Speech Production. Psychological Science. 7 4 226--231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Sakata, N., Kurata, T., Kato, T., Kourogi, M. and Kuzuoka, H. WACL: Supporting Telecommunications Using Wearable Active Camera with Laser Pointer. Proceedings of Int. Symp. on Wearable Computers 2003. IEEE Press (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Tang, A., Boyle, M. and Greenberg, S. Display and Presence Disparity in Mixed Presence Groupware. Proceedings of Australasian user Interface. ACM Press (2004). 73--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Tang, J. C. Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, (1991). 143--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Comparing remote gesture technologies for supporting collaborative physical tasks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2006
        1353 pages
        ISBN:1595933727
        DOI:10.1145/1124772

        Copyright © 2006 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 April 2006

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader