Thorsten Büring
Harald Reiterer
ABSTRACT
While zoomable user interfaces can improve the usability of applications by easing data access, a drawback is that some users tend to become lost after they have zoomed in. Previous studies indicate that this effect could be related to individual differences in spatial ability. To overcome such orientation problems, many desktop applications feature an additional overview window showing a miniature of the entire information space. Small devices, however, have a very limited screen real estate and incorporating an overview window often means pruning the size of the detail view considerably. Given this context, we report the results of a user study in which 24 participants solved search tasks by using two zoomable scatterplot applications on a PDA - one of the applications featured an overview, the other relied solely on the detail view. In contrast to similar studies for desktop applications, there was no significant difference in user preference between the interfaces. On the other hand, participants solved search tasks faster without the overview. This indicates that, on small screens, a larger detail view can outweigh the benefits gained from an overview window. Individual differences in spatial ability did not have a significant effect on task-completion times although results suggest that participants with higher spatial ability were slowed down by the overview more than low spatial-ability users.
- B. Allen. Information space representation in interactive systems: relationship to spatial abilities. In DL '98: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Digital libraries, pages 1--10, New York, NY, USA, 1998. ACM Press. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- P. Baudisch, B. Lee, and L. Hanna. Fishnet, a fisheye web browser with search term popouts: a comparative evaluation with overview and linear view. In AVI '04: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, pages 133--140, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. B. Bederson, A. Clamage, M. P. Czerwinski, and G. G. Robertson. Datelens: A fisheye calendar interface for pdas. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11(1):90--119, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Büring and H. Reiterer. Zuiscat: querying and visualizing information spaces on personal digital assistants. In MobileHCI '05: Proceedings of the 7th-international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices & services, pages 129--136, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. K. Card, J. D. Mackinlay, and B. Shneiderman, editors. Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Chen. Individual differences in a spatial-semantic virtual environment. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 51(6):529--542, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Chen, M. Czerwinski, and R. Macredie. Individual differences in virtual environments-introduction and overview. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 51(6):499--507, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Chen and M. P. Czerwinski. Spatial ability and visual navigation: An empirical study. The New Review for Hypertext and Multimedia, 3:40--66, 1997.Google Scholar
- M. P. Czerwinski and K. Larson. The new web browsers: They're cool but are they useful? In B. O. Thimbleby and P. Thomas, editors, People and Computers XII: Proceedings of HCI'97, Berlin, 1997. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
- N. Dahlbäck, K. Höök, and M. Sjölinder. Spatial cognition in the mind and in the world: The case of hypermedia navigation. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society University of California, San Diego, 1996.Google Scholar
- D. E. Egan. Individual differences in human-computer interaction. In M. Helander, editor, Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. 1988.Google Scholar
- D. E. Egan and L. M. Gomez. Assaying, isolating and accomodating individual differences in learning a complex skill. In D. R. F., editor, Individual Differences In Cognition, volume 2. Academic Press, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
- M. Hassenzahl, A. Platz, M. Burmester, and K. Lehner. Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal. In CHI '00: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 201--208, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Horn. Leistungspruefsystem. Hogrefe Verlag fuer Psychologie, Goettingen, 1983.Google Scholar
- K. Hornbæk, B. B. Bederson, and C. Plaisant. Navigation patterns and usability of zoomable user interfaces with and without an overview. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 9(4):362--389, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Hornbæk and E. Frøkjær. Reading of electronic documents: the usability of linear, fisheye, and overview+detail interfaces. In CHI '01: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 293--300, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- http://earth.google.com/.Google Scholar
- A. K. Karlson, B. B. Bederson, and J. SanGiovanni. Applens and launchtile: two designs for one-handed thumb use on small devices. In CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 201--210, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Lam and P. Baudisch. Summary thumbnails: readable overviews for small screen web browsers. In CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 681--690, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. F. Lohman. Spatial ability and g. Human abilities: Their nature and assessment, pages 97--116, 1996.Google Scholar
- K. Perlin and D. Fox. Pad: an alternative approach to the computer interface. In SIGGRAPH '93: Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 57--64. ACM Press, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Plaisant, D. Carr, and B. Shneiderman. Image-browser taxonomy and guidelines for designers. IEEE Softw., 12(2):21--32, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Shneiderman and C. Plaisant. Designing the user interface. Pearson/Addison-Wesley, 4. ed edition, 2005.Google Scholar
- K. M. Stanney and G. Salvendy. Information visualization: Assisting low spatial individuals with information access tasks through the use of visual mediators. Ergonomics, 38(6):1184--1198, 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. L. Thurstone and T. G. Thurstone. Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs, 1, 1938.Google Scholar
- K. J. Vicente, B. C. Hayes, and R. C. Williges. Assaying and isolating individual differences in searching a hierarchical file system. Hum. Factors, 29(3):349--359, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. J. Vicente and R. C. Williges. Accommodating individual differences in searching a hierarchical file system. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud., 29(6):647--668, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Usability of overview-supported zooming on small screens with regard to individual differences in spatial ability
Recommendations
User Interaction with Scatterplots on Small Screens - A Comparative Evaluation of Geometric-Semantic Zoom and Fisheye Distortion
Existing information-visualization techniques that target small screens are usually limited to exploring a few hundred items. In this article we present a scatterplot tool for Personal Digital Assistants that allows the handling of many thousands of ...
Designing embodied interfaces to support spatial ability
TEI '14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied InteractionIn this paper, I describe the motivation for and the background necessary to develop and evaluate an early set of design guidelines for creating tangible and embodied interfaces that focus on engaging, augmenting and improving spatial ability. I then ...
Focus plus context screens: combining display technology with visualization techniques
UIST '01: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technologyComputer users working with large visual documents, such as large layouts, blueprints, or maps perform tasks that require them to simultaneously access overview information while working on details. To avoid the need for zooming, users currently have to ...
Comments