skip to main content
10.1145/1186562.1015797acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Open Access
Seminal Paper

High dynamic range display systems

Published:01 August 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

The dynamic range of many real-world environments exceeds the capabilities of current display technology by several orders of magnitude. In this paper we discuss the design of two different display systems that are capable of displaying images with a dynamic range much more similar to that encountered in the real world. The first display system is based on a combination of an LCD panel and a DLP projector, and can be built from off-the-shelf components. While this design is feasible in a lab setting, the second display system, which relies on a custom-built LED panel instead of the projector, is more suitable for usual office workspaces and commercial applications. We describe the design of both systems as well as the software issues that arise. We also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the two designs and potential applications for both systems.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. ASHIKHMIN, M. 2002. A tone mapping algorithm for high contrast images. In Proc. of Eurographics Workshop on Rendering 2002, 145--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. BARTEN, P. 1992. Physical model for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye. In Proc. SPIE, vol. 1666, 57--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. BARTEN, P. 1993. Spatio-temporal model for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its temporal aspects. In Proc. SPIE, vol. 1913-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. CHIU, K., HERF, M., SHIRLEY, P., SWAMY, S., WANG, C., AND ZIMMERMAN, K. 1993. Spatially nonuniform scaling functions for high contrast images. In Proc. Graphics Interface '93, 245--253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. CHOUDHURY, P., AND TUMBLIN, J. 2003. The trilateral filter for high contrast images and meshes. In Proc. of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 186--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. DEBEVEC, P., AND MALIK, J. 1997. Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH '97, 369--378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. DICOM. 2001. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). http://www.medical.nema.org/dicom/2001.html, ch. Part 14: Grayscale Standard Display Function.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. DURAND, F., AND DORSEY, J. 2002. Fast bilateral filtering for the display of high-dynamic-range images. ACM Trans. Graph. (special issue SIGGRAPH 2002) 21, 3, 257--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. FATTAL, R., LISCHINSKI, D., AND M. WERMAN. 2002. Gradient domain high dynamic range compression. ACM Trans. Graph. (special issue SIGGRAPH 2002) 21, 3, 249--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. FISEKOVIC, N., NAUTA, T., CORNELISSEN, H., AND BRUININK, J. 2001. Improved motion-picture quality of AM-LCDs using scanning backlight. In IDW 2001 Proceedings, 1637--1640.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. GARDNER, A., TCHOU, C., HAWKINS, T., AND DEBEVEC, P. 2003. Linear light source reflectometry. ACM Trans. Graph. (special issue SIGGRAPH 2003) 22, 3, 749--758. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. KANG, S. B., UYTTENDAELE, M., WINDER, S., AND SZELISKI, R. 2003. High dynamic range video. ACM Trans. Graph. (special issue SIGGRAPH 2003) 22, 3, 319--325. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. LARSON, G. W., RUSHMEIER, H., AND PIATKO, C. 1997. A visibility matching tone reproduction operator for high dynamic range scenes. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics 3, 4, 291--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. MANN, S., AND PICARD, R. 1994. Being 'undigital' with digital cameras: Extending dynamic range by combining differently exposed pictures. Tech. Rep. 323, M.I.T. Media Lab Perceptual Computing Section. Also appears, IS&T's 48th annual conference, Cambridge, MA, May 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. MARK, W. R., GLANVILLE, R. S., AKELEY, K., AND KILGARD, M. J. 2003. Cg: A system for programming graphics hardware in a C-like language. ACM Trans. Graph. (special issue SIGGRAPH 2003) 22, 3, 896--907. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. MITSUNAGA, T., AND NAYAR, S. K. 1999. Radiometric self calibration. In Proc. of IEEE CVPR, 472--479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. MOON, P., AND SPENCER, D. 1945. The visual effect of non-uniform surrounds. Journal of the Optical Society of America 35, 3, 233--248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. MUKA, E., AND REIKER, G. 2002. Reconsidering bit depth for radiological images -- is eight enough? In Proc. SPIE, vol. 4686, 177--188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. OHTSUKI, H., NAKANISHI, K., MORI, A., SAKAI, S., YACHI, S., AND TIMMERS, W. 2002. 18.1-inch XGA TFT-LCD with wide color reproduction using high power led-backlighting. In Proc. Society for Information Display International Symposium, 1154--1157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. PATTANAIK, S. N., FERWERDA, J. A., FAIRCHILD, M. D., AND GREENBERG, D. 1998. A multiscale model of adaptation and spatial vision for realistic image display. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH '98, 287--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. REINHARD, E., STARK, M., SHIRLEY, P., AND FERWERDA, J. 2002. Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. ACM Trans. Graph. (special issue SIGGRAPH 2002) 21, 3, 267--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. ROBERTSON, M., BORMAN, S., AND STEVENSON, R. 1999. Dynamic range improvements through multiple exposures. In Proc. of International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) '99, 159--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. SCHLICK, C. 1994. Quantization techniques for visualization of high dynamic range pictures. In Proc. of Eurographics Workshop on Rendering '94, 7--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. SEETZEN, H., WHITEHEAD, L., AND WARD, G. 2003. A high dynamic range display using low and high resolution modulators. In Society for Information Display Internatiational Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 1450--1453.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. TUMBLIN, J., AND RUSHMEIER, H. 1993. Tone reproduction for realistic images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 13, 6, 42--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. TUMBLIN, J., AND TURK, G. 1999. LCIS: A boundary hierarchy for detail-preserving contrast reduction. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH '99, 83--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. VOS, J. 1984. Disability glare - a state of the art report. CIE Journal 3, 2, 39--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. High dynamic range display systems

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader