skip to main content
10.1145/280814.280922acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

A multiscale model of adaptation and spatial vision for realistic image display

Published:24 July 1998Publication History
First page image

References

  1. Adelson93.Adelson, E.H. (1993) Perceptual organization and judgment of brightness. Science, 262, 2042-2044.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Barlow72.Barlow, H.B. (1972) Dark and Light Adaptation: Psychophysics. In D. Jameson and L. Hurvich (Eds.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology, V. 7(4), New York: Springer, 2-27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Brady95.Brady, N. and Field, D.J. (1995) What's Constant in Contrast Constancy? The Effects of Scaling on the Perceived Contrast of Bandpass Patterns. Vision Res., 35(6), 739-756.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Burt83.Burt, RJ., and Adelson, E.H. (1983) The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code. IEEE Transaction on Communication, 31(4), 532-540.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Chiu93.Chiu, K., Herf, M., Shirley, R, Swamy, S., Wang, C., and Zimmerman, K. (1993) Spatially Nonuniform Scaling Functions for High Contrast Images. Proceedings Graphics Interface 93,245-254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Debevec97.Debevec, RE. and Malik, J. (1997) Recovering High Dynamic Range Radiance Maps from Images. Proceedings SIGGRAPH 97,369-378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fairchild98.Fairchild, M.D. (1998) Color Appearance Models. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferwerda96.Ferwerda, J.A., Pattanaik, S.N., Shirley, R, and Greenberg, D. (1996) A Model of Visual Adaptation for Realistic Image Synthesis. Proceedings SIG- GRAPH 96, 249-258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Georgeson75.Georgeson, M.A. and Sullivan, G.D. (1975) Contrast Constancy: Deblurring in Human Vision by Spatial Frequency Channels. J. Physiol., 252, 627- 656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gilchrist77.Gilchrist, A.L. (1977) Perceived Lightness Depends on Perceived Spatial Arrangement. Science, 195, 185-187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hunt95.Hunt, R.W.G. (1995) The Replvduction of Color. 5th edition, Kingstonupon-Thames, England: Fountain Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hurvich81.Hurvich, L. (1981) Color Vision. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Assoc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jobson96.Jobson, D.J., Rahman, Z., and Woodell, G.A. (1996) Retinex Image Processing: Improved Fidelity to Direct Visual Observation. Proceedings 4th Color Imaging Conference, Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 124-126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Laming91.Laming D. (1991) Contrast Sensitivity. In J.J. Kulikowski, V. Walsh, and I.J. Murray (Eds.) Limits' of Vision, Vol. 5, Vision and Visual Dysfunction. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 35-43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lubin95.Lubin, J. (1995). A Visual Discrimination Model for Imaging System Design and Evaluation. In E. Peli (Ed.) Vision Models for Target Detection. Singapore, World Scientific, 245-283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Losada94.Losada, M.A., and Mullen, K.T. (1994) The Spatial Tuning of Chromatic Mechanisms Identified by Simultaneous Masking. Vision Res., 34(3), 331-341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Mullen85.Mullen, K.T. (1985) The Contrast Sensitivity of Human Color Vision to Red-Green and Blue-Yellow Chromatic Gratings. J. Physiol., 359, 381-400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Peli90.Peli, E. (1990) Contrast in Complex Images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 7(10), 2032- 2040.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Schlick95.Schlick, C. (1995) Quantization Techniques for High Dynamic Range Pictures. In G. Sakas, R Shirley, and S. Mueller, (Eds.), Photorealistic Rendering Techniques, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 7-20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Shapley84.Shapley, R. and Enroth-Cugell, C. (1984) Visual Adaptation and Retinal Gain Controls. In N. Osborne and G. Chader (Eds.). P~vgress in Retinal Resemvh, V. 3, Oxford: Pergamon Press., 263-347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Spencer95.Spencer, G., Shirley, P., Zimmerman, K., Greenberg, D. P. (1995) Physically-based Glare Effects for Computer Generated Images. Proceedings SIG- GRAPH 95,325-334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Stevens61.Stevens, S.S. (1961) To Honor Fechner and Repeal His Law. Science, 133, 13 Jan., 80-86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Tumblin93.Tumblin, J., and Rushmeier, H. (1993) Tone Reproduction for Realistic Images, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 13(6), 42-48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tumblin97.Tumblin, J., Hodgkins, J. and Guenter, B. (1997) Display of High Contrast Images Using Models of Visual Adaptation. Visual proceedings SIGGRAPH 97, 154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. vanNes67.van Nes F.L. and Bouman M.A. (1967) Spatial Modulation Transfer in the Human Eye. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 57,401-406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. vanderHorst69.van der Horst, G.J.C. and Bouman, M.A. (1969) Spatiotemporal Chromaticity Discrimination. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 59(11), 1482-1488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Ward94.Ward, G. (1994) A Contrast-based Scalefactor for Luminance Display. In RS. Heckbert (Ed.), Graphics Gems IV, Boston: Academic Press Professional. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ward-Larson97.Ward-larson, G., Rushmeier, H., and Piatko, C. (1997) A Visibility Matching Tone Reproduction Operator for High Dynamic Range Scenes. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 3(4), 291-306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Watson97.Watson, A.B. and Solomon, J.A. (1997) Model of Visual Contrast Gain Control and Pattern Masking. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 14(9), 2379-2391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Westheimer86.Westheimer, G. (1986) The Eye as an Optical Instrument. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of Pelveption and Human Pelformance, New York: Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilson91.Wilson, H.R. (1991). Psychophysical Models of Spatial Vision and Hyperacuity, in D. Regan (Ed.) Spatial Vision, Vol. 10, Vision and Visual Dysfunction. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 64-81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Wyszecki82.Wyszecki G., and Stiles W.S. (1982) Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae (2nd edition). New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A multiscale model of adaptation and spatial vision for realistic image display

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGGRAPH '98: Proceedings of the 25th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
            July 1998
            472 pages
            ISBN:0897919998
            DOI:10.1145/280814

            Copyright © 1998 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 24 July 1998

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            SIGGRAPH '98 Paper Acceptance Rate45of303submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

            Upcoming Conference

            SIGGRAPH '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader