Oliver Deussen
- 1.Alias/Wavefront; a division of Silicon Graphics Ltd. Studio V8. SGI program, 1996.Google Scholar
- 2.AnimaTek, Inc. AnimatTek's World Builder. PC program, 1996.Google Scholar
- 3.R.A. Armstrong. A comparison of index-based and pixel-based neighborhood simulations of forest growth. Ecology, 74(6):1707-1712, 1993.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 4.A. C. Beers, M. Agrawala, and N. Chaddha. Rendering from compressed textures. In SIGGRAPH 96 Conference Proceedings, pages 373-378, August 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.B. M. Blumberg and T. A. Galyean. Multi-level direction of autonomous creatures for real-time virtual environments. In SIGGRAPH 95 Conference Proceedings, pages 47-54, August 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.B.N. Boots. Spatial tesselations: concepts and applications of Voronoi diagrams. John Wiley, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.A. Brownbill. Reducing the storage required to render L-system based models. Master's thesis, University of Calgary, October 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.N. Chiba, K. Muraoka, A. Doi, and J. Hosokawa. Rendering of forest scenery using 3D textures. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation, 8:191-199, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 9.Adobe Corporation. Adobe Photoshop.Google Scholar
- 10.O. Deussen and B. Lintermann. A modelling method and user interface for creating plants. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 97, pages 189-197, May 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.J. Dorsey, H. K~hling Pedersen, and E Hanrahan. Flow and changes in appearance. In SIGGRAPH 96 Conference Proceedings, pages 411- 420, August 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.T. Duff. Compositing 3-D rendered images. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 85 Proceedings), 19(3):41-44, 1985. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.F. G. Firbank and A. R. Watkinson. A model of interference within plant monocultures. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 116:291-311, 1985.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 14.K.W. Fleischer, D. H. Laidlaw, B. L. Currin, and A. H. Bart. Cellular texture generation. In SIGGRAPH 95 Conference Proceedings, pages 239-248, August 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.R.W. Floyd and L. Steinberg. An adaptive algorithm for spatial gray scale. In SID 75, Int. Symp. Dig. Tech. Papers, pages 36-37, 1975.Google Scholar
- 16.D.R. Fowler, E Prusinkiewicz, and J. Battjes. A collision-based model of spiral phyllotaxis. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 92 Proceedings), 26(2):361-368, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.G. Y. Gardner. Simulation of natural scenes using textured quadric surfaces. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 84 Proceedings), 18(3): 11- 20, 1984. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.A. Gersho and R. M. Gray. Vector quantization and signal compression. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.D. G. Green. Modelling plants in landscapes. In M. T. Michalewicz, editor, Plants to ecosystems. Advances in computational life sciences I, pages 85-96. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, 1997.Google Scholar
- 20.J. C. Hart and T. A. DeFanti. Efficient anti-aliased rendering of 3D linear fractals. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 91 Proceedings), 25:91-100, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.J.C. Hart. The object instancing paradigm for linear fractal modeling. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 92, pages 224-231, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22.E Heckbert. Color image quantization for frame buffer display. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 82 Proceedings), 16:297-307, 1982. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 23.S.I. Higgins and D. M. Richardson. A review of models of alien plant spread. Ecological Modelling, 87:249-265, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 24.H. Hoppe. View-dependent refinement of progressive meshes. In SIG- GRAPH 97 Conference Proceedings, pages 189-198, August 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25.D. H. House, G. S. Schmidt, S. A. Arvin, and M. Kitagawa-DeLeon. Visualizing a real forest. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 18(1):12-15, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 26.J.T. Kajiya and T. L. Kay. Rendering fur with three dimensional textures. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 89 Proceedings), 23(3):271- 289, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 27.T. L. Kay and J. T. Kajiya. Ray tracing complex scenes. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 86 Proceedings), 20(4):269-278, 1986. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 28.A. D. Kelley, M. C. Malin, and G. M. Nielson. Terrain simulation using a model of stream erosion. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 88 Proceedings), 22(4):263-268, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 29.C. Kolb. Rayshade. http://graphics.stanford.edu/~cek/rayshade.Google Scholar
- 30.M. E Kumler. An intensive comparison of triangulated irregular networks (TINs) and digital elevation models (DEMs). Cartographica, 31(2), 1994.Google Scholar
- 31.M. Levoy and E Hanrahan. Light field rendering. In SIGGRAPH 96 Conference Proceedings, pages 31-42, August 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 32.B. Lintermann and O. Deussen. Interactive structural and geometrical modeling of plants. To appear in the IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.Google Scholar
- 33.B. Lintermann and O. Deussen. Interactive modelling and animation of natural branching structures. In R. Boulic and G. H6gron, editors, Computer Animation and Simulation 96. Springer, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 34.Lucasfilm Ltd. The Adventures of Andr6 and Wally B. Film, 1984.Google Scholar
- 35.D. Marshall, D. S. Fussel, and A. T. Campbell. Multiresolution rendering of complex botanical scenes. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 97, pages 97-104, May 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 36.N. Max. Hierarchical rendering of trees from precomputed multi-layer Z-buffers. In X. Pueyo and E Schr6der, editors, Rendering Techniques 96, pages 165-174 and 288. Springer Wien, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 37.N. Max and K. Ohsaki. Rendering trees from precomputed Z-buffer views. In E M. Hanrahan and W. Purgathofer, editors, Rendering Techniques 95, pages 74-81 and 359-360. Springer Wien, 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 38.F. K. Musgrave, C. E. Kolb, and R. S. Mace. The synthesis and rendering of eroded fractal terrains. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 89 Proceedings), 23(3):41-50, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 39.R. M6ch and E Prusinkiewicz. Visual models of plants interacting with their environment. In SIGGRAPH 96 Conference Proceedings, pages 397-410, August 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 40.F. Neyret. A general and multiscale model for volumetric textures. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 95, pages 83-91, 1995.Google Scholar
- 41.F. Neyret. Synthesizing verdant landscapes using volumetric textures. In X. Pueyo and E Schro6der, editors, Rendering Techniques 96, pages 215-224 and 291, Wien, 1996. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 42.K. Perlin. An image synthesizer. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 85 Proceedings), 19(3):287-296, 1985. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 43.M. Pharr, C. Kolb, R. Gershbein, and E Hanrahan. Rendering complex scenes with memory-coherent ray tracing. In SIGGRAPH 97 Conference Proceedings, pages 101-108, August 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 44.E Prusinkiewicz. Visual models of morphogenesis. Artificial Life, 1(1/2):61-74, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 45.E Prusinkiewicz. Modeling spatial structure and development of plants: a review. Scientia Horticulturae, 74(1/2), 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 46.E Prusinkiewicz, M. Hammel, and E. Mjolsness. Animation of plant development. In SIGGRAPH 93 Conference Proceedings, pages 351- 360, August 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 47.E Prusinkiewicz and A. Lindenmayer. The algorithmic beauty of plants. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990. With J. S. Hanan, F. D. Fracchia, D. R. Fowler, M. J. M. de Boer, and L. Mercer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 48.E Prusinkiewicz, W. Remphrey, C. Davidson, and M. Hammel. Modeling the architecture of expanding Fraxinus pennsylvanica shoots using L-systems. Canadian Journal of Botany, 72:701-714, 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 49.Questar Productions, LLC. World Construction Set Version 2. PC program, 1997.Google Scholar
- 50.W.T. Reeves and R. Blau. Approximate and probabilistic algorithms for shading and rendering structured particle systems. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 85 Proceedings), 19(3):313-322, 1985. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 51.C.W. Reynolds. Flocks, herds, and schools: A distributed behavioral model. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 87 Proceedings), 21(4):25- 34, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 52.R. E. Ricklefs. Ecology. Third Edition. W. H. Freeman, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
- 53.J. Shade, D. Lischinski, D. Salesin, T. DeRose, and J. Snyder. Hierarchical image caching for accelerated walkthroughs of complex environments. In SIGGRAPH 96 Conference Proceedings, pages 75-82, August 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 54.H. Sinoquet and R. Rivet. Measurement and visualization of the architecture of an adult tree based on a three-dimensional digitising device. Trees, 11:265-270, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 55.A.R. Smith. Plants, fractals, and formal languages. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 84 Proceedings), 18(3):1-10, 1984. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 56.J.M. Snyder and A. H. Bart. Ray tracing complex models containing surface tessellations. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 87 Proceedings), 21(4):119-128, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 57.R.R. Sokal and F. J. Rohlf. Biometry. Third Edition. W. H. Freeman, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
- 58.K. A. Sorrensen-Cothern, E. D. Ford, and D. G. Sprugel. A model of competition incorporating plasticity through modular foliage and crown development. Ecological Monographs, 63(3):277-304, 1993.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 59.I.E. Sutherland. Sketchpad: A man-machine graphical communication system. Proceedings of the Spring Joint Computer Conference, 1963.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 60.J.H.M. Thornley and I. R. Johnson. Plant and crop modeling: A mathematical approach to plant and crop physiology. Oxford University Press, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
- 61.S.J. Wan, S. K. M. Wong, and E Prusinkiewicz. An algorithm for multidimensional data clustering. ACM Trans. Math. Software, 14(2): 135- 162, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 62.A. Watt and M. Watt. Advanced animation and rendering techniques: Theory and practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1992. Google Scholar
- 63.J. Weber and J. Penn. Creation and rendering of realistic trees. In SIG- GRAPH 95 Conference Proceedings, pages 119-128, August 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 64.L. Williams. Casting curved shadows on curved surfaces. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 78 Proceedings), 12(3):270-274, 1978. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 65.L. Williams. Shading in two dimensions. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 91, pages 143-151, June 1991.Google Scholar
- 66.H. Wu, K. W. Malafant, L. K. Pendridge, E J. Sharpe, and J. Walker. Simulation of two-dimensional point patterns: application of a latice framework approach. Ecological Modelling, 38:299-308, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Realistic modeling and rendering of plant ecosystems
Recommendations
Modeling Plants and Plant Ecosystems: Recent Results and Current Open Problems.
CGI '99: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer GraphicsThe modeling of plants is an interdisciplinary area in which a combination of biological knowledge, mathematical formalisms, and computer graphic techniques makes it possible to create realistic simulations of the development and structure of plants. ...
A rapid hierarchical rendering technique for translucent materials
This paper introduces an efficient two-pass rendering technique for translucent materials. We decouple the computation of irradianceat the surface from the evaluation of scattering inside the material.This is done by splitting the evaluation into two ...
A rapid hierarchical rendering technique for translucent materials
SIGGRAPH '02: Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniquesThis paper introduces an efficient two-pass rendering technique for translucent materials. We decouple the computation of irradianceat the surface from the evaluation of scattering inside the material.This is done by splitting the evaluation into two ...
Comments