skip to main content
article

Virtual videography

Published:01 February 2007Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Well-produced videos provide a convenient and effective way to archive lectures. In this article, we offer a new way to create lecture videos that retains many of the advantages of well-composed recordings, without the cost and intrusion of a video production crew. We present an automated system called Virtual Videography that employs the art of videography to mimic videographer-produced videos, while unobtrusively recording lectures. The system uses the data recorded by unattended video cameras and microphones to produce a new edited video as an offline postprocess. By producing videos offline, our system can use future information when planning shot sequences and synthesizing new shots. Using simple syntactic cues gathered from the original video and a novel shot planning algorithm, the system makes cinematic decisions without any semantic understanding of the lecture.

References

  1. Abowd, G. 1999. Classroom 2000: An experiment with the instrumentation of a living educational environment. IBM Syst. J. 38, 4, 508--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bares, W. and Lester, J. 1999. Intelligent multi-shot visualization interfaces for dynamic 3D worlds. In Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 119--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bianchi, M. 1998. Autoauditorium: A fully automatic, multi-camera system to televise auditorium presentations. Presented at the Joint DARPA/NIST Smart Spaces Technology Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bianchi, M. 2004. Automatic video production of lectures using an intelligent and aware environment. In MUM: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM Press, New York. 117--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bordwell, D. 1998. On the History of Film Style. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns, B., Marks, R., Beymer, D., Weber, J., Gleicher, M., and Rosenchein, S. 1998. Person tracking research at autodesk. In 3rd Bay Area Vision Meeting: Visual Analysis of People---Invited Talk.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Burns, K. 2001. Jazz: A Film by Ken Burns. PBS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Canopus 2002. Canopus Imaginate. http://www.canopus-corp.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantine, J., Howard, S., and Lewis, B. 1995. Shot By Shot: A Practical Guide to Filmmaking. Pittsburgh Filmmakers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, M. 2001. Design of a virtual auditorium. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference. ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Christianson, D. B., Anderson, S. E., He, L.-W., Weld, D. S., Cohen, M. F., and Salesin, D. H. 1996. Declarative camera control for automatic cinematography. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference. 148--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Clark, R. 1983. Reconsidering research on learning from media. Rev. Educ. Res. 53, 4, 445--459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Clark, R. 1991. When researchers swin upstream: Reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media. Educ. Technol., 34--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Cutler, R. et al. 2002. Distributed meetings: A meeting capture and broadcasting system. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference. ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Drucker, S. and Zeltzer, D. 1995. Camdroid: A system for implementing intelligent camera control. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 139--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Girgensohn, A., Bly, S., Boreczky, J., and Wilcox, L. 2001. Home video editing made easy--Balancing automation and user control. In Proceedings of the Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT Conference. 464--471.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Girgensohn, A., Boreczky, J., Chiu, P., Doherty, J., Foote, J., Golovchinsky, G., Uchihashi, S., and Wilcox, L. 2000. A semi-automatic approach to home video editing. In Proceedings of the UIST Conference. 81--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gleicher, M. and Masanz, J. 2000. Towards virtual videography (poster session). In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference. ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Gleicher, M. and Witkin, A. 1992. Through-the-Lens camera control. Comput. Graph. 26, 2 (Jul.), 331--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Gleicher, M. L., Heck, R. M., and Wallick, M. N. 2002. A framework for virtual videography. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Smart Graphics. ACM Press, New York. 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. He, L., Cohen, M., and Salesin, D. August 1996. The virtual cinematographer: A paradigm for automatic real-time camera control and directing. In Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH Conference. 217--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. He, L., Liu, Z., and Zhang, Z. 2002. Why take notes? Use the whiteboard capture system. Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-2002-89, Microsoft Research. September.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. He, L., Sanocki, E., Gupta, A., and Grudin, J. 1999. Auto-Summarization of audio-video presentations. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference. ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. James, D. and Hunter, J. 2000. A streamlined system for building online presentation archives using smil. In Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Computing Education. ACM Press, New York. 145--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jones, M. J. and Rehg, J. M. 1998. Statistical color models with application to skin detection. Tech. Rep. CRL 98/11, Cambridge Research Laboratory.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Karp, P. and Feiner, S. 1993. Automated presentation planning of animation using task decomposition with heuristic reasoning. In Proceedings of the Graphics Interface Conference. 118--127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Katz, S. 1991. Film Directing Shot by Shot: Visualizing from Concept to Screen. Michael Wiese Productions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, D.-S., Erol, B., Graham, J., Hull, J. J., and Murata, N. 2002. Portable meeting recorder. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference. ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Li, Y., Zhang, T., and Tretter, D. 2001. An overview of video abstraction techniques. Tech. Rep. HPL-2001-191, Imaging Systems Laboratory, HP Laboratories, Palo Alto, California. July.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu, T. and Kender, J. R. 2003. Spatial-Temporal semantic grouping of instructional video content. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Machnicki, E. and Rowe, L. 2002. Virtual director: Automating a webcase. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Multimedia Computing and Networking.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Machrone, B. 2003. Every photo tells a story. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,1404041,00.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Mukhopadhyay, S. and Smith, B. 1999. Passive capture and structuring of lectures. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Onishi, M., Izumi, M., and Fukunaga, K. 2000. Blackboard segmentation using video image of lecture and its applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition. 615--618. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Onishi, M., Kagebayashi, T., and Fukunaga, K. 2001. Production of video images by computer controlled camera and its application to TV conference system. In Proceedings of the CVPR01 Conference. 131--137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Pinhanez, C. S. and Bobick, A. F. 1997. Intelligent studios: Using computer vision to control TV cameras. Appli. Artifi. Intell. 11, 4, 285--306.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Rowe, L., Harley, D., Pletcher, P., and Lawrence, S. 2003. Bibs: A lecture webcasting system. Tech. Rep. 1005, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley. http://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/cshedu/1005.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Rui, Y., He, L., Gupta, A., and Liu, Q. 2001. Building an intelligent camera management system. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Russell, D. M. 2000. A design pattern-based video summarization technique: Moving from low-level signals to high-level structure. In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Saund, E. 1999. Image mosaicing and a diagrammatic user interface for an office whiteboard scanner. http://www.parc. xerox.com/spl/members/saund/zombieboard-public.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Saund, E., Fleet, D., Larner, D., and Mahoney, J. 2003. Perceptually-Supported image editing of text and graphics. In Proceedings of the UIST Conference. 183--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Stagetools. 2002. Moving Pictures. http://www.stagetools.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Steinmetz, A. and Kienzle, M. 2001. The e-seminar lecture recording and districution system. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Multimedia Computing and Networking. vol. 4312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Syeda-Mahmood, T. and Srinivasan, S. 2000. Detecting topical events in digital video. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference. ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Teodosio, L. and Bender, W. 1993. Salient video stills: Content and context preserved. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference. ACM Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Virtual Ink. 2004. Mimio. http://www.mimio.com/index.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Wallick, M., Rui, Y., and He, L. 2004. A portable solution for automatic lecture room camera management. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Wallick, M. N., Heck, R. M., and Gleicher, M. L. 2005. Chalkboard and marker regions. In Proceedings of the Mirage---Computer Vision/Computer Graphics Collaboration Techniques and Applications Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang, F., Ngo, C., and Pong, T. 2004. Gesture tracking and recognition for lecture video editing. In Proceedings of the ICPR Conference. 934--937. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Web page. 2005. The great media debate. http://hagar.up.ac.za/rbo/construct/media.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Virtual videography

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader