skip to main content
10.1145/569005.569007acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmartgraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A framework for virtual videography

Published:11 June 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

There are a significant number of events that happen on a regular basis that would be worth preserving on video but for which it is impractical to use traditional video production methods. In this paper, we describe one possible way to inexpensively and unobtrusively capture and produce video in a classroom lecture environment. We discuss the importance of cinematic principles in the lecture video domain and describe guidelines that should be followed when capturing a lecture. We continue by surveying the tools provided by computer vision and computer graphics that allow us to determine syntactic information about images. Finally, we describe a way to combine these tools to create a framework for a Virtual Videography system, one that can automatically generate production quality video. This framework is based on the creation of region objects, a semantically related region of video, despite the fact that we can reliably only gather syntactic information.

References

  1. William Bares and James Lester. Intelligent multi-shot visualization interfaces for dynamic 3d worlds. In Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 119-126, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Bianchi. Autoauditorium: a fully automatic, multi-camera system to televise auditorium presentations, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. David Bordwell. On the History of Film Style. Harvard University Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. David Bordwell and Kristin Thompson. Film Art: An Introduction. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Drucker and D. Zeltzer. Camdroid: A system for implementing intelligent camera control. 1995 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pages 139-144, April 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Foveal Systems, LLC. Auto auditorium. web page, 1999-2000. www.autoauditorium.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. William T. Freeman, David B. Anderson, Paul A. Beardsley, Chris N. Dodge, Michal Roth, Craig D. Weissman, William S. Yerazunis, Hiroshi Kage, Kazuo Kyuma, Yasunari Miyake, and Ken ichi Tanaka. Computer vision for interactive computer graphics. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 18(3):42-53, May - June 1998. ISSN 0272-1716. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Michael Gleicher and James Masanz. Towards virtual videography. In Proceedings ACM Multimedia 2000, November 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. L. He, M. Cohen, and D. Salesin. The virtual cinematographer: A paradigm for automatic real-time camera control and directing. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 96, pages 217-224, August 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Hunke and A. Waibel. Face locating and tracking for human-computer interaction, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Todd Hovanyecz John D. Gould, John Conti. Composing letters with a simulated listening typewriter non-traditional interactive modes. Proceedings of Human Factors in Computer Systems, pages 367-370, 1982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Michael J. Jones and James M. Rehg. Statistical color models with application to skin detection. Technical Report CRL 98/11, Cambridge Research Laboratory, December 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shanon Ju, Michael Black, Scott Minneman, and Don Kimber. Summarization of video-taped presentations: Automatic analysis of motion and gesture. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. F. Kelley. An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 2(1):26-41, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Norman J. Medoff and Tom Tanquary. Portable Video ENG and EFP. Focal Press, fourth edition edition, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sugata Mukhopadhyay and Brian Smith. Passive capture and structuring of lectures. In ACM Conference on Multimedia, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. University of Wisconsin Madison. eteach. http://eteach.engr.wisc.edu/newEteach/home.html, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yong Rui, Liwie He, Anoop Gupta, and Qioung Liu. Building an intelligent camera management system. In Proceedings of MultiMedia, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Eric Saund. Image mosaicing and a diagrammatic user interface for an office whiteboard scanner. http://www.parc.xerox.com/spl/members/saund/zombieboard-public.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Harpreet Sawhney and Serge Ayer. Compact representations of videos through dominant and multiple motion estimation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, April 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Arno Schodl, Richard Szeliski, David Salesin, and Irfan Essa. Video textures. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 00, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Tanveer Syeda-Mahmood and et al. Cuevideo: A system for cross-modal search and browse of video databases. In Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Virtual Ink Corp. Mimio. Computer Hardware Product, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Michael N. Wallick, Niels da Vitoria Lobo, and Mubarak Shah. Computer vision framework for analyzing computer and overhead projections from within video. International Journal of Computers and Their Applications, 8(2), June 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. J. Y. A. Wang and E. H. Adelson. Representing moving images with layers. The IEEE Transactions on Image Processing Special Issue: Image Sequence Compression, 3(5):625-638, September 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. A framework for virtual videography

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SMARTGRAPH '02: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on Smart graphics
      June 2002
      148 pages
      ISBN:1581135556
      DOI:10.1145/569005

      Copyright © 2002 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 June 2002

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader