skip to main content
10.1145/1240624.1240735acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Back stage on the front lines: perspectives and performance in the combat information center

Published:29 April 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

While tactical command. control and communication environments might appear to be entirely instrumental in nature, they nevertheless provide a setting for social interaction. This paper describes how such interaction occurs in a particular naval tactical command and control system, focusing on the shared perspectives created by the organizational, administrative and professional aspects of the environment and on issues of self-presentation. It is argued that the complexity and multiplicity of interactional regions in this environment lead to problematic situations for key actors, and that these problems may have relevance to future computing environments.

References

  1. Adkins, M. and Kruse, J., Network Centric Warfare in the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet. U.S. DoD, Washington, DC, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, P.B., "Maritime Work and Communication," Australian J. Info. Sys. 8, 2 (2001), 83--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, D.M., Aegis Guided Missile Cruiser. MBI, Osceola, WI, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben-Ari, E., Mastering Soldiers: Conflict, Emotions, and the Enemy in an Israeli Military Unit. Berghahn, Oxford, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonini, D., "ATC Do I Trust Thee? Referents of Trust in Air Traffic Control," Ext. Abstracts, CHI 2001, ACM (2001), 449--450. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Boslaugh, D.L., When Computers Went to Sea. IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke, A.E., "Social Worlds/Arenas Theory as Organizational Theory," in Social Organization & Social Process, Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, NY, 1991, 119--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, M.S., Freeman, J.T. and Thompson, B., "Critical Thinking Skills in Tactical Decision Making: A Model and a Training Strategy," in Making Decisions Under Stress, APA, Washington, DC, 1998, 155--189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Endsley, M.R., Bolté, B. and Jones, D.G., Designing for Situation Awareness. Taylor & Francis, London, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fitzpatrick, G., The Locales Framework. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fogarty, W.N., Formal Investigation into the Circumstances Surrounding the Downing of a Commercial Airliner by the USS Vincennes (CG 49) on July 3, 1988. U.S. DoD, Washington, DC, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gabler, E., The American Telegrapher: A Social History. Rutgers Univ. Press, Piscataway, NJ, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ginnett, R.C., First Encounters of the Close Kind: The Formation Process of Airline Flight Crews. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale Univ., New Haven, CT, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Goffman, E., The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor, New York, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Harper, R.H.R. and Hughes, J.A., "What a f-ing system! Send 'em all to the same place and then expect us to stop 'em hitting: Making Technology Work in Air Traffic Control," in Technology in Working Order, Routledge, London, 1993, 127--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Heath, C.C. and Luff, P.K., "Collaboration and Control: Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms," CSCW 1, 1--2 (1992), 69--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Homans, G.C., "The Small Warship," Am. Sociol. Rev. 11, 3 (1946), 294--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Hutchins, E., Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kieras, D.E. and Santoro, T.P., "Computational GOMS Modeling of a Complex Team Task: Lessons Learned," Proc. CHI 2004, ACM (2004), 97--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ling, R. and Yttri, B., "Hyper-coordination via Mobile Phones in Norway," in Perpetual Contact, CUP, Cambridge, 2002, 139--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mark, G., "Conventions and Commitments in Distributed CSCW Groups," CSCW 11, 3--4 (2002), 349--387. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mark, G. and Poltrock, S., "Groupware Adoption in a Distributed Organization: Transporting and Transforming Technology through Social Worlds," Info. & Org. 14, 4 (2004), 297--327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. McGee, D.R., Cohen, P.R., Wesson, R.M. and Horman, S., "Comparing Paper and Tangible, Multimodal Tools," Proc. CHI 2002, ACM (2002), 407--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Meyrowitz, J., No Sense of Place. OUP, Oxford, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Munsey, C., "Collision Course: Navy Relieves Carrier CO," Navy Times (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Pakenham, W.T.T., Naval Command and Control. Brassey's, London, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Patterson, E.S., Watts-Perotti, J. and Woods, D.D., "Voice Loops as Coordination Aids in Space Shuttle Mission Control," CSCW 8, 4 (1999), 353--371. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Perrow, C., Normal Accidents. Basic Books, New York, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Roberts, K.H., Stout, S.K. and Halpern, J.J., "Decision Dynamics in Two High Reliability Military Organizations," Mgmt. Sci. 40, 5 (1994), 614--624. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Sherry, J., Mainwaring, S., Burrell, J., Beckwith, R. and Salvador, T., "'This All Together, Hon?' Ubicomp in Non-office Work Environments," Proc. Ubicomp 2004, Springer (2004), 179--195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Shibutani, T., The Derelicts of Company K: A Sociological Study of Demoralization. U.C. Press, Berkeley, CA, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Shibutani, T., "Reference Groups as Perspectives," Am. J. Sociol. 60, 6 (1955), 562--569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Snook, S.A., Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of U.S. Black Hawks Over Northern Iraq. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Weick, K.E., "Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability," Calif. Mgmt. Rev. 29, 2 (1987), 112--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Wouk, H., The Caine Mutiny. Doubleday, Garden City, NY, 1951.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Zuboff, S., In the Age of the Smart Machine. Basic Books, New York, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Back stage on the front lines: perspectives and performance in the combat information center

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2007
        1654 pages
        ISBN:9781595935939
        DOI:10.1145/1240624

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 April 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '07 Paper Acceptance Rate182of840submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader