skip to main content
10.1145/1240624.1240736acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Citizen communications in crisis: anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation

Published:29 April 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent world-wide crisis events have drawn new attention to the role information communication technology (ICT) can play in warning and response activities. Drawing on disaster social science, we consider a critical aspect of post-impact disaster response that does not yet receive much information science research attention. Public participation is an emerging, large-scale arena for computer-mediated interaction that has implications for both informal and formal response. With a focus on persistent citizen communications as one form of interaction in this arena, we describe their spatial and temporal arrangements, and how the emerging information pathways that result serve different post-impact functions. However, command-and-control models do not easily adapt to the expanding data-generating and -seeking activities by the public. ICT in disaster contexts will give further rise to improvised activities and temporary organizations with which formal response organizations need to align.

References

  1. Aguirre, BE. 1993. Review of Social Science Research on Warning, Evacuation, and Search and Rescue. Hazard and Recovery Center, Texas A&M.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, D. 2002. From civil defense to civil protection-& back again.Disaster Prevention & Management 11(3):209--213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blandford, A & William Wong, BL. 2004. Situation awareness in emergency medical dispatch. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(4): 421--452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Boehner, K, DePaula, R, Dourish, P, & Sengers, P. 2005. Affect: From Information to Interaction. Proc. Critical Computing: Fourth Decennial Aarhus Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Calloway, LJ, & Keen, P. 1996. Organizing for crisis response. Journal of Information Technology, 11(1):13--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Camp, PJ, Hudson, JM, Keldorph, RB, Lewis, S, Mynatt, ED. 2000. Supporting Communication and Collaboration Practices in Safety-Critical Situations. Proc. of CHI:249--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dawes, SS, Birkland, T, Tayi, GK & Schneider, CA. 2004. Information, Technology, & Coordination: Lessons from the World Trade Center Response. Center for Technology in Government, Univ at Albany, SUNY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Drabek, TE, Key, WH, Erickson, PE, & Crowe, JL. 1975. The impact of disaster on kin relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family August: 481--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dynes, RR. 1970. Organized Behavior in Disaster. Heath.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Espinoza, F, Persson, P, Sandin, A, Nyström, H, Cacciatore, E, & Bylund, M. 2001. GeoNotes: Social and Navigational Aspects of Location-Based Information Systems. In Proc. of Ubiquitous Computing, 2--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fischer III, HW. 1998. Response to Disaster: Fact Versus Fiction & Perpetuation, 2nd ed. Univ Press of America: NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fritz, CE. 1957. Disasters Compared in Six American Communities. In NJ. Demerath & AFC. Wallace (Eds) Human Organization by, 16(2): 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gillmor, D. 2004. We the Media: The Rise of Citizen Journalists. National Civic Review, Fall 2004: 58--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Grider, S. 2001. Spontaneous Shrines: A Modern Response to Tragedy & Disaster. New Directions in Folklore, Oct. (5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Halverson, C. 1995. Inside the Cognitive Workplace: New Technology & Air Traffic Control. PhD Dissertation, UCSD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hannestad, S. E. 2005. Incident Command System: A Developing National Standard of Incident Management in the U.S. Proc of ISCRAM Conference, Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Heath, C & Luff, P. 1992. Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground control rooms. CSCW Journal, 1(1,2): 69--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Holzman, TG. 1999. Computer-human interface solutions for emergency medical care. Interactions 6(3): 13--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hughes, JA., Randall, D & Shapiro D. 1992. Faltering from ethnography to design. Proc of CSCW: 115--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hutchins, E & Klausen, T. 1996. Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In Engeströöm & D. Middleton (Eds) Cognition & Communication at Work, Cambridge Univ Press, 15--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hutchins, E. 1996. Cognition in the Wild. MIT: Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jiang, X, Hong, JI, Takayama, LA, & Landay, JA. 2004. Ubiquitous Computing for Firefighters: Field Studies and Prototypes of Large Displays for Incident Command. Proc. of CHI, 6(1): 679--686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Johnson, CW. 2005. Applying the Lessons of the Attack on the World Trade Center, 11th September 2001, to the Design & Use of Interactive Evacuation Simulations. Proc. of CHI: 651--660. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jones, Q., Grandhi, S. A., Whittaker, S., Chivakula, K., and Terveen, L. 2004. Putting systems into place: a qualitative study of design requirements for location-aware community systems. Proc. of CSCW, 202--211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Kendra, J. & Wachtendorf, T. 2003. Creativity in Emergency Response to the World Trade Center Disaster. In Beyond September 11: An Account of Post Disaster Research, Natural Hazards Center, Boulder, CO, 121--146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kristensen, M., Kyng, M., & Palen, L. 2006. Participatory Design in Emergency Medical Service: Designing for Future Practice, Proc. of CHI 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Lanzara, GF. 1983. Ephemeral Organizations in Extreme Environments: Emergence, Strategy, Extinction. Journal of Management Studies 20(1): 71--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Law, P. & Peng, Y. 2004. Cellphone, Internet, and the SARS Epidemic. International Workshop on Mobile Technologies and Health: Benefits and Risks. Udine (Italy), 7--8 June 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Mendonça, D & Wallace, WA. 2004. Studying Organizationally-Situated Improvisation in Response to Extreme Events. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 22(2): 5--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Mileti, D, Sorensen, J, Sorensen, BV, & Sutton, J. 2002. Warning America. Natural Hazards Center, Boulder, CO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitchell, JK, Kabachnik, P, Donovan, R, Noguchi, J & Mitchell, T. 2001. Field Observations of Lower Manhattan in the Aftermath of the World Trade Center Disaster: September 11, 2001. Natural Hazards Center, QRR#139, Boulder, CO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Murphy, R. 2004. Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, & Cybernetics, 32(2): 138--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Palen, L, Hiltz, SR, Liu, S. To Appear. Online Forums Supporting Grassroots Participation in Emergency Preparedness and Response. Communications of the ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Pettersson, M., Randall, D. & Helgeson, B. 2002. Ambiguities, Awareness and Economy: A Study of Emergency Service Work. In Proc. of CSCW: 286--295. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Powell, JW. 1954. An Introduction to the Natural History of Disaster. Univ. of Maryland: Disaster Research Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Stallings, RA. 2003. Methods of Disaster Research. Xlibris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Stephenson, R & Anderson, P. 1997. Disasters & the IT Revolution. Disasters 21(4):305--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Sutton, J. 2003. A Complex Organizational Adaptation to the World Trade Center Disaster: An Analysis of Faith-based Organizations.In Beyond September 11th: An Account of Post-Disaster Research, Natural Hazards Center, Boulder, CO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor, JG, Gillette, S, Hodgson, RW, & Downing, JL. 2005. Communicating with Wildland Interface Communities During Wildfire. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2005--2061.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Tierney, K., Lindell, MK, & Perry, RW. 2001. Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. John Henry Press: Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Tierney, K. & Quarantelli, EL. 1989. Needed Innovation in the Delivery of Emergency Medical Services in Disasters: Present and Future. Disaster Management, 2(2): 70--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Trainor, JE. 2004. Searching for a System: Multi-Organizational Coordination in the September 11th World Trade Center Search and Rescue Response. Univ of Delaware Disaster Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Turoff, M., Chumer, M., Van de Walle, B., & Yao, X. 2004. The Design of Emergency Response Management Information Systems (DERMIS). Journal of Information Technology Theory & Application 5(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. US. House of Representatives. 2006. A Failure of Initiative: Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. US. The White House. 2006. The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Wachtendorf, T. 2004. Improvising 9/11: Organizational Improvisation Following the World Trade Center Disaster, Dissertation, Univ of Delaware Disaster Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Wachtendorf, T. & Kendra, JM. 2005. Improvising Disaster in the City of Jazz: Organizational Response to Hurricane Katrina. Understanding Katrina: Perspectives from the Social Sciences, understandingkatrina.ssrc.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Weick, KE. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing (2nd ed.). Random House: New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Weick, KE. 1996. Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Wenger, DE, Quarantelli, EL. & Dynes, RR. 1990. Is the Incident Command System a Plan for All Seasons and Emergency Situations? University of Delaware, Disaster Research Center, #215.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Yuan, Y & Detlor, B. 2005. Intelligent Mobile Crisis Response Systems. Comm of the ACM, 48 (2): 95--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Citizen communications in crisis: anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
              April 2007
              1654 pages
              ISBN:9781595935939
              DOI:10.1145/1240624

              Copyright © 2007 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 29 April 2007

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              CHI '07 Paper Acceptance Rate182of840submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader