skip to main content
10.1145/1277741.1277802acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Structured retrieval for question answering

Published:23 July 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Bag-of-words retrieval is popular among Question Answering (QA) system developers, but it does not support constraint checking and ranking on the linguistic and semantic information of interest to the QA system. We present anapproach to retrieval for QA, applying structured retrieval techniques to the types of text annotations that QA systems use. We demonstrate that the structured approach can retrieve more relevant results, more highly ranked, compared with bag-of-words, on a sentence retrieval task. We also characterize the extent to which structured retrieval effectiveness depends on the quality of the annotations.

References

  1. D. Bikel, et al. An algorithm that learns what's in a name. ML, 34(1-3):211--231, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Bilotti, et al. What works better for question answering: Stemming or morphological query expansion? In Proc. of IR4QA at SIGIR, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Carmel, et al. Searching XML documents via XML fragments. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H. Cui, et al. Question answering passage retrieval using dependency relations. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Graff. The AQUAINT Corpus of English News Text. LDC, 2002. Cat. No. LDC2002T31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Harabagiu, et al. Employing two question answering systems in TREC-2005. In Proc. of TREC-14, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. P. Kingsbury, et al. Adding semantic annotation to the penn treebank. In Proc. of HLT, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Lin and E. Hovy. The automated acquisition of topic signatures for text summarization. In Proc. of COLING, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Lin and B. Katz. Building a reusable test collection for question answering. JASIST, 57(7):851--861, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Marcus, et al. Building a large annotated corpus of english: the penn treebank. CL, 19(2):313--330, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Montague and J. Aslam. Relevance score normalization for metasearch. In Proc. of CIKM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Ogilvie and J. Callan. Combining document representations for known-item search. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Pradhan, et al. Shallow semantic parsing using support vector machines. In Proc. of HLT, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Prager, et al. Question-answering by predictive annotation. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. Rajashekar and W. B. Croft. Combining automatic and manual index representations in probabilistic retrieval. JASIS, 46(4):272--283, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Reynar and A. Ratnaparkhi. A maximum entropy approach to identifying sentence boundaries. In Proc. of ANLP, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Shaw and E. Fox. Combination of multiple searches. In Proc. of TREC-3, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. T. Strohman, et al. Indri: A language model-based search engine for complex queries. In Proc. of ICIA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Tellex, et al. Quantitative evaluation of passage retrieval algorithms for question answering. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. H. Turtle and W. Croft. Evaluation of an inference network-based retrieval model. ACM TOIS, 9(3):187--222, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. E. Voorhees, et al. The collection fusion problem. In Proc. of TREC-3, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. C. Zhai and J. Lafferty. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In Proc. of SIGIR, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Structured retrieval for question answering

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '07: Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
      July 2007
      946 pages
      ISBN:9781595935977
      DOI:10.1145/1277741

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 July 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader