skip to main content
10.1145/1281192.1281200acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

On string classification in data streams

Published:12 August 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

String data has recently become important because of its use in a number of applications such as computational and molecular biology, protein analysis, and market basket data. In many cases, these strings contain a wide variety of substructures which may have physical significance for that application. For example, such substructures could represent important fragments of a DNA string or an interesting portion of a fraudulent transaction. In such a case, it is desirable to determine the identity, location, and extent of that substructure in the data. This is a much more difficult generalization of the classification problem, since the latter problem labels entire strings rather than deal with the more complex task of determining string fragments with a particular kind of behavior. The problem becomes even more complicated when different kinds of substrings show complicated nesting patterns. Therefore, we define a somewhat different problem which we refer to as the generalized classification problem. We propose a scalable approach based on hidden markov models for this problem. We show how to implement the generalized string classification procedure for very large data bases and data streams. We present experimental results over a number of large data sets and data streams.

References

  1. C. C. Aggarwal. On Effective Classification of Strings with Wavelets. ACM KDD Conference, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. C. Aggarwal, J. Han, J. Wang, P. S. Yu. On Demand Classification of Data Streams. ACM KDD Conference, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Agrawal, R. Srikant. Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules. VLDB Conference, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. G. J. Barton. Protein Multiple Sequence Alignment and Flexible Pattern Matching. Methods in Enzymology, 183, 403--428, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. G. A. Churchill. Stochastic Models for Heterogeneous DNA Sequences. Bull. Math Biol, 59, pp. 79--91, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Deshpande, G. Karypis. Evaluation of Techniques for Classifying Biological Sequences. Technical report, TR 01-33, University of Minnesota, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. P. Domingos, G. Hulten. Mining High-Speed Data Streams. ACM SIGKDD Conference, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. Gusfield. Algorithms on Strings, Trees and Sequences. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Haussler, A. Krogh, I. S. Mian, K. Sjolander. Protein Modeling using Hidden Markov Models: Analysis of Globins. Technical Report UCSC-CRL-92-23, University of California at Snta Cruz Computer Science, Santa Cruz, CA, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Haussler, A. Krogh, I. S. Mian, K. Sjolander. Protein Modeling Using Hidden Markov Models: Analysis of Globins. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. G. Hulten, L. Spencer, P. Domingos. Mining Time-Changing Data Streams. ACM KDD Conference, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. K. Karplus, C. Barrett, R. Hughey. Hidden Markov Models for Detecting Remote Protein Homologies. Bioinformatics, 14(10): pp. 846--856, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Krogh, M. Brown, T. S. Mian, K. Sjolander, D. Haussler. Hidden Markov Models in Computational Biology: Applications to Protein Modeling. University of California Technical Report UCSC-CRL-93-32, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. V. Borkar, K. Deshmukh, S. Sarawagi. Automatic Segmentation of Text into Structured Records. SIGMOD Conference, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. W. R. Taylor. The Classification of Amino Acid Conservation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 119, 205--218, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. A. J. Viterbi. Error Bounds for Convolutional Codes and an Asymptotically Optimal Decoding Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, IT-13, 260--269, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. S. Waterman. Sequence Alignments. Mathematical Methods for DNA Sequences, Waterman M. S. ed. CRC Press, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. ftp://ircache.nlanr.net/Traces/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On string classification in data streams

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '07: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      August 2007
      1080 pages
      ISBN:9781595936097
      DOI:10.1145/1281192

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 August 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      KDD '07 Paper Acceptance Rate111of573submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader