skip to main content
10.1145/1281192.1281201acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Xproj: a framework for projected structural clustering of xml documents

Published:12 August 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

XML has become a popular method of data representation both on the web and in databases in recent years. One of the reasons for the popularity of XML has been its ability to encode structural information about data records. However, this structural characteristic of data sets also makes it a challenging problem for a variety of data mining problems. One such problem is that of clustering, in which the structural aspects of the data result in a high implicit dimensionality of the data representation. As a result, it becomes more difficult to cluster the data in a meaningful way. In this paper, we propose an effective clustering algorithm for XML data which uses substructures of the documents in order to gain insights about the important underlying structures. We propose new ways of using multiple sub-structuralinformation in XML documents to evaluate the quality of intermediate cluster solutions, and guide the algorithms to a final solution which reflects the true structural behavior in individual partitions. We test the algorithm on a variety of real and synthetic data sets.

References

  1. C. C. Aggarwal, C. Procopiuc, J. Wolf, P. S. Yu, J.-S. Park. Fast Algorithms for Projected Clustering. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Conference, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. C. Aggarwal. A Human-Computer Interactive Method for Projected Clustering. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16(4), 448--460, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. Asai, K. Abe, S. Kawasoe, H. Arimura, H. Satamoto, S. Arikawa. Efficient substructure discovery from large semi-structured data. ACM SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S. S. Chawathe. Comparing Hierachical data in external memory. Very Large Data Bases Conference, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. Dalamagas, T. Cheng, K. Winkel, T. Sellis. Clustering XML Documents Using Structural Summaries. Information Systems, Elsevier, January 2005. Also appeared in EDBT 2004 Workshops on Current Trends in Database Technology, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Guha, R. Rastogi, K. Shim. ROCK: a Robust Clustering Algorithm for Categorical Attributes, International Conference on Data Engineering, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Jain and R. Dubes. Algorithms for Clustering Data. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ, USA, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Lee, W. Hsu, L. Yang, X. Yang. XClust: Clustering XML Schemas for Effective Integration. ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. W. Li, J. Han, J. Pei. CMAR: Accurate and Efficient Classification Based on Multiple Class-Association Rules. International Conference on Data Mining, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. W. Lian, D. W. Cheung, N. Mamoulis, S. Yiu. An Efficient and Scalable Algorithm for Clustering XML Documents by Structure. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol 16, No. 1, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. Ng, J. Han. Efficient and Effective Clustering Methods for Spatial Data Mining. VLDB Conference, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Pei, J. Han, B.-M. Asl, H. Pinto, Q. Chen, U. Dayal, M.-C. Hsu. PrefixSpan: Mining sequential patterns efficiently by prefix-projected pattern growth. International Conference on Data Engineering, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Termier, M-C. Rousset, M. Sebag. TreeFinder: a First Step towards XML Data Mining. International Conference on Data Mining, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Wang, J Han. BIDE: Efficient Mining of Frequent Closed Sequences. International Conference on Data Engineering, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. Wang, H. Q. Liu. Discovering Typical Structures of Documents: A Road Map Approach. ACM SIGIR Conference, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. J. Zaki, C. C. Aggarwal. XRules: An Effective Structural Classifier for XML Data. ACM KDD Conference, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. T. Zhang, R. Ramakrishnan, M. Livny. BIRCH: An Efficient Data Clustering Method for Very Large Databases. ACM SIGMOD Conference, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. J. Zaki. Efficiently Mining Frequent Trees in a Forest. ACM KDD Conference, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Xproj: a framework for projected structural clustering of xml documents

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '07: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      August 2007
      1080 pages
      ISBN:9781595936097
      DOI:10.1145/1281192

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 August 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      KDD '07 Paper Acceptance Rate111of573submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader