skip to main content
10.1145/1347390.1347411acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

GeoTUI: a tangible user interface for geoscience

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 February 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

GeoTUI is a system designed for geophysicists that provides props as tangible user interface on a tabletop vision-projection system for the selection of cutting planes on a geographical map of a subsoil model. Our GeoTUI system allows the geophysicists to manipulate in the same action and perception space since the movement of the physical artifacts is done on the tabletop and thus constrained to two dimensions. Consequently, it combines the advantages of the spontaneous conditions of user interaction that the geophysicists are commonly used to in their classical paper/pen/ruler environment with the advantages of the use of powerful geological simulation software. We conducted an extensive user study in the workplace of the geophysicists that clearly revealed that using a tangible interaction performs better than using the standard mouse/keyboard GUI for the cutting line selection task on a geographical subsoil map. Consequently, it increases the efficiency for the real-world trade task of hypothesis validation on a subsoil model. Moreover, this geological user case is complex enough to confirm the hypothesis that in space-multiplex conditions, specialized devices perform better than generic ones.

References

  1. Aliakseyeu, D., Subramanian, S., Martens, J. B. and Rauterberg, M. Interaction Techniques for Navigation through and Manipulation of 2D and 3D Data. In Proc. EGVE'02, Eurographics Association (2002), 179--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Fitzmaurice, G. Graspable User Interfaces. PhD Thesis, University of Toronto, Canada, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Fitzmaurice, G., Ishii, H. and Buxton, W. Bricks: Laying the Foundations for Graspable User Interfaces. In Proc. CHI'95, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley (1995), 442--449. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fitzmaurice, G. and Buxton, W. An empirical evaluation of graspable user interfaces: Towards specialized space-multiplexed input. In Proc. CHI'97, ACM Press (1997), 43--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fjeld, M., Bichsel, M. and Rauterberg, M. BUILD-IT: An Intuitive Design Tool Based on Direct Object Manipulation. In Proc. GW'97, Springer-Verlag (1997), 297--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hang, C, Not Just Intuitive: Examining the Basic Manipulation of Tangible User Interfaces. In Proc. CHI'04, ACM Press (2004), 1387--1390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hinckley, K., Pausch, R., Goble, J. C. and Kassel, N. F. Passive Real-World Interface Props for Neurosurgical Visualization. In Proc. CHI '94, ACM Press (1994), 452--458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hornecker, E. Understanding the Benefits of Graspable Interfaces for Cooperative Use. In Proc. Coop'2002, IOS Press (2002), 71--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms, In Proc. CHI '97, ACM Press (1997), 234--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jurado, F., Sinoquet, D. and Lailly, P. Jerry: a 3D reflection tomography designed for complex structures. KIM 1996 Annual Report, Institut Franĉais du Pétrole, Pau, France, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaltenbrunner, M. and Bencina, R. reacTIVision: a computer-vision framework for table-based tangible interaction. In Proc. TEI'07, ACM Press (2007), 69--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kobayashi, K., Hirano, M., Narita, A. and Ishii, H. A Tangible Interface for IP Network Simulation. In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 800--801. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Maher, M. L. and Kim, M. J. Studying Designers Using A Tabletop System For 3D Design. In Proc. Tabletop 2006, IEEE Computer Society (2006), 105--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Norman, D. A. The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, NY, USA, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Norman, D. A. Affordance, conventions, and design. Journal Interaction 6, 3 (1999), 38--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Patten, J., Recht, B. and Ishii, H. Audiopad: A Tag-based Interface for Musical Performance. In Proc. NIME02, National University of Singapore (2002), 11--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Payne, S. J. and Green, T. R. G. Task-Action Grammars: A Model of the Mental Representation of Task Languages. Human-Computer Interaction 2, 2 (1986), 93--133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Perlman, R. Using computer technology to provide a creative learning environment for preschool children. MIT AI Lab Memo No. 360/Logo Memo No. 24, (1976).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Piper, B., Ratti, C. and Ishii, H. Illuminating Clay: A 3D Tangible Interface for Landscape Analysis. In Proc. CHI 2002, ACM Press (2002), 355--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ratti, C., Wang, Y., Piper, B., Ishii, H. and Biderman, A. PHOXEL-SPACE: an Interface for Exploring Volumetric Data with Physical Voxels, In Proc. DIS '04, ACM Press (2004), 289--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Wellner, P. Interacting with paper on the DigitalDesk, Communications of the ACM 36, 7 (1993), 86--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Wilson, A. D. PlayAnywhere: A Compact Interactive Tabletop Projection-Vision System, In Proc. UIST'05, ACM Press (2005), 83--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Microsoft Surface. http://www.microsoft.com/surface/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. GeoTUI: a tangible user interface for geoscience

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            TEI '08: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction
            February 2008
            267 pages
            ISBN:9781605580043
            DOI:10.1145/1347390

            Copyright © 2008 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 February 2008

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader