Raphael Hoffmann
Patrick Baudisch
ABSTRACT
An increasing number of users are adopting large, multi-monitor displays. The resulting setups cover such a broad viewing angle that users can no longer simultaneously perceive all parts of the screen. Changes outside the user's visual field often go unnoticed. As a result, users sometimes have trouble locating the active window, for example after switching focus. This paper surveys graphical cues designed to direct visual attention and adapts them to window switching. Visual cues include five types of frames and mask around the target window and four trails leading to the window. We report the results of two user studies. The first evaluates each cue in isolation. The second evaluates hybrid techniques created by combining the most successful candidates from the first study. The best cues were visually sparse --- combinations of curved frames which use color to pop-out and tapered trails with predictable origin.
- Austen, E. and Enns, J. T. Change detection: Paying attention to detail. Psyche, 6, 11.Google Scholar
- Bartram, L., Ware, C., and Calvert, T. W. Moticons: detection, distraction and task. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 58, 5 (2003), 515--545,. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., Robbins, D., Czerwinski, M., Tandler, P. Bederson, B., and Zierlinger, A. Drag-and-Pop and Drag-and-Pick: Techniques for Accessing Remote Screen Content on Touch- and Pen-operated Systems. In Proc Interact 2003, 57--64.Google Scholar
- Baudisch, P. and Rosenholtz, R. Halo: a technique for visualizing off-screen objects. In Proc CHI 2003, 481--488. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Baudisch, P., Tan, D. S., Collomb, M., Robbins, D. C., Hinckley, K., Agrawala, M., Zhao, S., and Ramos, G. Phosphor: explaining transitions in the user interface using afterglow effects. In Proc UIST 2006, 169--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bezerianos, A., Dragicevic, P., and Balakrishnan, R. Mnemonic rendering: an image-based approach for exposing hidden changes in dynamic displays. In Proc UIST 2006, 159--168. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Callaghan, T. C. Interference and dominance in texture segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 4 (1989), 299--311.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chi, C.-F. and Lin, F.-T. A comparison of seven visual fatigue assessment techniques in three data-acquisition vdt tasks. Human Factors, 40, 4 (1998), 577--590.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Czerwinski, M., Smith, G., Regan, T., Meyers, B., Robertson, G. G., and Starkweather, G. Toward characterizing the productivity benefits of very large displays. In Proc Interact 2003, 9--16.Google Scholar
- Duncan, J. and Humphreys, G. W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 3 (1989), 433--458.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grudin, J. Partitioning Digital Worlds: Focal and Peripheral Awareness in Multiple Monitor Use. In Proc CHI 2001, 458--465. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hillstrom, A. P. and Yantis, S. Visual motion and attentional capture. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 4 (1994), 399--411.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hutchings, D. R., Smith, G., Meyers, B., Czerwinski, M., and Robertson, G. G. Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users. In Proc AVI 2004, 32--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khan, A., Matejka, J., Fitzmaurice, G. W., and Kurtenbach, G. Spotlight: directing users' attention on large displays. In Proc CHI 2005, 791--798. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kleffner, D. A. and Ramachandran, V. S. On the perception of shape from shading. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 1 (1992), 18--36.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pashler, H. Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 4 (1988), 307--318.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Plaue, C. and Stasko, J. T. Animation in a peripheral display: distraction, appeal, and information conveyance in varying display configurations. In Graphics Interface 2007, 135--142. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rantanen, E. M. and Goldberg, J. H. The effect of mental workload on the visual field size and shape. Ergonomics, 42, 6 (1999), 816--834.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robertson, G. G., Czerwinski, M., Baudisch, P., Meyers, B., Robbins, D. C., Smith, G., and Tan, D. S. The large-display user experience. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 25, 4 (2005), 44--51. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Su, R. E. and Bailey, B. P. Put them where? Towards guidelines for positioning large displays in interactive workspaces. In Proc Interact 2005, 337--349. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suh, B., Woodruff, A., Rosenholtz, R., and Glass, A. Popout Prism: Adding Perceptual Principles to Overview+Detail Document Interfaces. In Proc CHI 2002, 251--258. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tan, D. S., Gergle, D., Scupelli, P., and Pausch, R. With similar visual angles, larger displays improve spatial performance. In Proc CHI 2003, 217--224. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tan, D. S., Gergle, D., Scupelli, P., and Pausch, R. Physically large displays improve performance on spatial tasks. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 13, 1 (2006), 71--99. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Treisman, A. and Gelade, G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12 (1980), 97--136.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vogel, D. and Baudisch, P. Shift: A Technique for Operating Pen-Based Interfaces Using Touch. In Proc CHI 2007, 657--666. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wolfe, J.M. and Horowitz, T. S. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5 (2004), 1--7.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wolfe, J. M., Oliva, A., Horowitz, T. S., Butcher, S. J., and Bompas, A. Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks. Vision Research, 42 (2002), 2985--3004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wolfe, J. M. and O'Neill, P. Why are there eccentricity effects in visual search? visual and attentional hypotheses. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 1 (1998), 140--156.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhai, S., Wright, J., Selker, T., and Kelin, S.-A. Graphical means of directing user's attention in the visual interface. In Proc Interact 1997, 59--66. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Evaluating visual cues for window switching on large screens
Recommendations
Spotlight: directing users' attention on large displays
CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe describe a new interaction technique, called a spotlight, for directing the visual attention of an audience when viewing data or presentations on large wall-sized displays. A spotlight is simply a region of the display where the contents are ...
Push-and-pull switching: window switching based on window overlapping
CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe propose Push-and-Pull Switching, a window switching technique using window overlapping to implicitly define groups. Push-and-Pull Switching enables switching between groups and restacking the focused window to any position to change its group ...
Supporting window switching with spatially consistent thumbnail zones: design and evaluation
INTERACT'11: Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 international conference on Human-computer interaction - Volume Part IComputer users switch between applications and windows all day, but finding the target window can be difficult, particularly when the total number of windows is high. We describe the design and evaluation of a new window switcher called SCOTZ (for ...
Comments