skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357316acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

In-car gps navigation: engagement with and disengagement from the environment

Published:06 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Although in-car GPS navigation technology is proliferating, it is not well understood how its use alters the ways people interpret their environment and navigate through it. We argue that GPS-based car navigation might disengage people from their surrounding environment, but also has the potential to open up novel ways to engage with it. We present an ethnographically-informed study with GPS users, showing evidence for practices of disengagement as well as new opportunities for engagement, illustrating our findings using rich descriptions from the field. Grounded in our observations we propose design principles for GPS systems that support richer experiences of driving. We argue that for a fuller understanding of issues of disengagement and engagement with the environment we need to move beyond a focus on the (re)design of GPS devices, and point to future directions of work that embrace a broader perspective.

References

  1. Agre, P.E. (1997). Metaphor in practice. Computation and Human Experience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge, 27--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aporta, C., & Higgs, E. (2005). Satellite culture -- global positioning systems, Inuit wayfinding, and the need for a new account of technology. Current Anthropology, 46(5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanco, M., Biever, W.J., Gallagher, J.P., & Dingus T.A. (2006). The impact of secondary task cognitive processing demand on driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, B.A.T., & Laurier, E. (2003). Maps & journeying: an ethnomethodological approach. Cartographica, 4(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, B.A.T., & Perry, M. (2002). Of maps and guidebooks: Designing geographical technologies. Proc. DIS'02. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bull, M. (2000). Sounding out the city: Personal stereos and the management of everyday life. Oxford: Berg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnett. G.E., & Lee, K. (2005). The effect of vehicle navigation systems on the formation of cognitive maps. In Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application, Edited by G. Underwood.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnett, G.E., Summerskill, S.J., & Porter, J.M. (2004). On-the-move destination entry for vehicle navigation systems: Unsafe by any means? Behaviour and Information Technology, 23(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chrisman, N. (2005). Full circle: more than just social implications of GIS. Cartographica 40(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dourish, P. (2006). Re-spaceing place: "place" and "space" ten years on. Proc. CSCW'06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Forbes, N. (2006). Online survey of in-vehicle navigation system users. University of Nottingham. http://www.mrl.nott.ac.uk/~nlf/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaver, W.W., Beaver, J., & Benford, S. (2003). Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proc. CHI'03. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-placeing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems. Proc. CSCW'96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jain, S. (2002). Urban errands: The means of mobility. Journal of Consumer Culture, 2(3).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lobben, A.K. (2004). Tasks, strategies, and cognitive processes associated with navigational map reading: a review perspective. The Professional Geographer, 56(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lorimer, H., & Lund, K. (2003) Performing facts: finding a way over Scotland's mountains. The Soc. Review 51(s2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. May, A.J., & Ross, T. (2006). Presence and quality of navigational landmarks: Effect on driver performance and implications for design. Human Factors, 48(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Noel, E., Nonnecke, B., & Trick, L. (2005). Evaluating first-time and infrequent use of in-car navigation devices. Proceedings of the 3rd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, Rockport, ME.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. O'Hara, K., Mitchell, A.S., & Vorbau, A. (2007). Consuming video on mobile devices. Proc. CHI'07. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. eds. (2003). How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technology. MIT: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Patel, K., Chen, M., Smith, I., & Landay, J.A. (2006). Personalizing Routes. Proc. UIST'06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rogers, S., Fiechter, C., & Langley, P. (1999). An adaptive interactive agent for route advice. Proc. AGENTS'99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sengers, P., & Gaver, W.W. (2006). Staying open to interpretation: Engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. Proc. DIS'06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Srinivasan, R. & Jovanis, P.P. (1997). Effect of in-vehicle route guidance systems on driver workload and choice of vehicle speed: findings from a driving simulator experiment. Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Svahn, F. (2004). In-car navigation usage: An end-user survey on existing systems. Proc. IRIS'27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Tamminen, S., Oulasvirta, A., Toiskallio, K., & Kankainen, A. (2004). Understanding mobile contexts. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 8(2). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Thrift, N. (2004) Driving in the City. Theory Culture Society, 21(4/5).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Tuan, Y. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Urry, J. (2004). The system of automobility. Theory Culture Society, 21 (4/5).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Williamson, J., Strachan, S., & Murray-Smith, R. (2006). It's a long way to Monte Carlo: probabilistic display in GPS navigation. Proc. MobileHCI'06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Wyatt, S. (2003). Non-users also matter: the construction of users and non-users of the internet. In How Users Matter. N. Oudshoorn and T. Pinch, eds. MIT: MIT Press, 67--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. In-car gps navigation: engagement with and disengagement from the environment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2008
        1870 pages
        ISBN:9781605580111
        DOI:10.1145/1357054

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 April 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate157of714submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader