skip to main content
10.1145/1367497.1367517acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning multiple graphs for document recommendations

Published:21 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Web offers rich relational data with different semantics. In this paper, we address the problem of document recommendation in a digital library, where the documents in question are networked by citations and are associated with other entities by various relations. Due to the sparsity of a single graph and noise in graph construction, we propose a new method for combining multiple graphs to measure document similarities, where different factorization strategies are used based on the nature of different graphs. In particular, the new method seeks a single low-dimensional embedding of documents that captures their relative similarities in a latent space. Based on the obtained embedding, a new recommendation framework is developed using semi-supervised learning on graphs. In addition, we address the scalability issue and propose an incremental algorithm. The new incremental method significantly improves the efficiency by calculating the embedding for new incoming documents only. The new batch and incremental methods are evaluated on two real world datasets prepared from CiteSeer. Experiments demonstrate significant quality improvement for our batch method and significant efficiency improvement with tolerable quality loss for our incremental method.

References

  1. F. Chung. Spectral Graph Theory. American Mathematical Society, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. F. Chung. Laplacians and the cheeger inequality for directed graphs. Annals of Combinatorics, 9, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Cohn and H. Chang. Learning to probabilistically identify authoritative documents. Proc. ICML 2000. pp.167--174., 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Cohn and T. Hofmann. The missing link - a probabilistic model of document content and hypertext connectivity. In T. K. Leen, T. G. Dietterich, and V. Tresp, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13, pages 430--436. MIT Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. C. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, T. K. Landauer, G. W. Furnas, and R. A. Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 41(6):391--407, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Fazel, H. Hindi, and S. P. Boyd. Log-det heuristic for matrix rank minimization with applications to hankel and euclidean distance matrices. In Proceedings of American Control Conference, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. Guha, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkins. Propagation of trust and distrust. In WWW ?04: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 403--412, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. X. He, H. Zha, C. H. Q. Ding, and H. D. Simon. Web document clustering using hyperlink structures. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 41(1):19--45, November 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. T. Hofmann. Unsupervised learning by probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Machine Learning, 42(1-2):177--196, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. Hofmann. Latent semantic models for collaborative filtering. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 22(1):89--115, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Reidl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In WWW ?01: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 285--295, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. F. Wang, S. Ma, L. Yang, and T. Li. Recommendation on item graphs. In ICDM ?06: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Data Mining, pages 1119--1123, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Wang, A. P. de Vries, and M. J. T. Reinders. Unifying user-based and item-based collaborative filtering approaches by similarity fusion. In SIGIR ?06: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 501--508, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Yu, A. Schwaighofer, V. Tresp, X. Xu, and H.-P. Kriegel. Probabilistic memory-based collaborative filtering. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16(1):56--69, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Zha, C. Ding, M. Gu, X. He, and H. Simon. Spectral relaxation for k-means clustering. In Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 14, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Zhou and C. J. C. Burges. Spectral clustering and transductive learning with multiple views. In ICML ?07: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning, pages 1159--1166, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Zhou, I. Councill, H. Zha, and C. L. Giles. Discovering temporal communities from social network documents. In ICDM?07: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Zhou, J. Huang, and B. Scholkopf. Learning from labeled and unlabeled data on a directed graph. In ICML ?05: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning, pages 1036--1043, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. Zhou, E. Manavoglu, J. Li, C. L. Giles, and H. Zha. Probabilistic models for discovering e-communities. In WWW ?06: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 173--182. ACM Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Zhu, K. Yu, Y. Chi, and Y. Gong. Combining content and link for classification using matrix factorization. In SIGIR '07: Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Learning multiple graphs for document recommendations

          Recommendations

          Reviews

          Amos O Olagunju

          The measurement of document similarities by using citations in a digital library naturally leads to fundamental questions. How should different graphs for measurement of document similarities in information retrieval systems be presented__?__ How should document citation (DC) graphs and bipartite graphs of the document-author (DA) and document-publication (DP) venue be explored to develop novel document similarity metrics__?__ Principles and applications of collaborative item filtering (CIF) in document similarity measurement exist in the literature [1,2,3]. However, the usefulness of CIF in networked document items (DIs) on the Web remains underexploited. The authors propose a new document recommendation framework predicated on the semi-supervised learning of multiple graphs. The framework includes a multiple graph learning model for accurately capturing the relative similarities among single low-dimensional embedded DIs in a latent semantic space, and a label propagation scheme for making use of the similarities among partly tagged documents to calculate approximately the labels of untagged documents. The authors combine the learning represented in the DC, DA, and DP graphs into an optimization problem, with factorization strategies to obtain the distinctive traits of the graphs. They present an incremental document embedding update algorithm for enhancing the scalability and efficiency of processing large documents in digital libraries. The standard conjugate gradient method is used to solve the optimization problems in both the learning and the incremental updating of document insertion. The proposed batch and incremental techniques for merging multiple graphs by document similarity measurement are evaluated using samples of datasets from real-world digital databases containing documents with citations, authors, and venues. Experimental precision and recall results of document recommendations show major quality enhancement with the batch technique, and a significant upgrade of efficiency, with acceptable quality depreciation, with the incremental method. Consequently, the planned graph-synthesizing methods are excellent candidates for document recommendation over cooperating networks of digital libraries. Online Computing Reviews Service

          Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

          Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            WWW '08: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web
            April 2008
            1326 pages
            ISBN:9781605580852
            DOI:10.1145/1367497

            Copyright © 2008 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 21 April 2008

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader